Background Humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) has been proven less intense in maintenance dialysis patients as compared to healthy subjects, leading the French authorities to recommend a third injection in this population. Here, we investigated the response to the third injection in two cohorts of hemodialysis patients. Methods Data from two prospective observational cohorts were collected. In the first -“systematic”- cohort, patients from 2 hemodialysis centers (n = 66) received a 3rd injection of BNT162b2, regardless of the response after two injections. In the second -“conditional”- cohort, the injection was only prescribed to patients (n = 34) with no or low response to the previous two doses. In both cohorts, the 3rd dose was injected 1 to 2 months after the 2nd dose. Serology was performed after the 2nd and 3rd dose to assess anti-Spike IgG antibody titer. Results In the “systematic” cohort, anti-Spike IgG were found in 83.3% and 92.4% of patients after the 2nd and the 3rd dose of BNT162b2, respectively. In this cohort, 6/11 (54.5%) and 20/21 (95.2%) patients switched from non-responder to low-responder and from low-responder to high-responder, respectively. In low and high-responders to 2 doses, 50/55 (90.9%) at least doubled their anti-Spike IgG titer. Similar trends were observed in the “conditional” cohort. Conclusions In maintenance hemodialysis patients, humoral response against SARS-Cov-2 was boosted after a third dose of BNT162b2, allowing seroconversion in more than half of non-responders. These data may support an intensified vaccination protocol with a 3rd dose of BNT162b2 in dialysis patients.

No abstract

Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) prevents human rabies and is accessible in Cambodia principally in Phnom Penh, the capital. Timely, affordable access to PEP is a challenge for the mainly rural population. We aimed to identify districts independently associated with PEP noncompletion to position frontline vaccination centers. We analyzed the 2009-2013 database at the Rabies Prevention Center at the Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh. Logistic regressions identified nongeographic determinants of PEP noncompletion as well as the districts that were independently associated with noncompletion after adjustment for these determinants. The influence of distance by road was estimated using a boosted regression-trees model. We computed a population attributable fraction (rabies index (RI)) for each district and developed a map of this RI distribution. A cartographic analysis based on the statistic developed by Getis and Ord identified clusters of high-RI districts. Factors independently associated with noncompletion were patients' district of residence, male sex, age 15-49 years, initial visit during rice harvest, the dog's status (culled or disappeared), and a prescribed PEP protocol requiring more than 3 PEP sessions (4 or 5). Four clusters of high-RI districts were identified using this analytical strategy, which is applicable to many vaccination or other health services. Positioning frontline PEP centers in these districts could significantly widen access to timely and adequate PEP.

Introduction Patients on dialysis (HDP) are a category at high risk from COVID-19 and thus a high-priority group for vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been a concern since the availability of the first vaccine. The objective of this study was to determine hesitancy rates and factors associated with hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination in HDP. Methods HDP were surveyed with an ad hoc questionnaire in four large dialysis facilities in Europe: Le Mans and Paris, in France, Cagliari and Pavia, in Italy. The questionnaire explored different domains associated with vaccine hesitancy, such as perception of disease severity, sources of information about the vaccine and the disease, and confidence in the healthcare system. Results 417 patients (average age 69, 60% men) agreed to answer the questionnaire. Hesitancy was associated with younger age (p 0.003), lower perception of disease severity (<0.001) and vaccine efficacy (p<0.001), lower trust in vaccination (p<0.001) and in the healthcare system and scientists (p<0.001) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate models, concerns about side effects (p 0.004) and vaccine efficacy (<0.001) and living in France (p 0.04) remained associated with higher vaccine hesitancy, while having received an influenza vaccine (p 0.032) and trusting scientists (p 0.032) were associated with a more positive attitude towards vaccination. Conclusions HDP have a good understanding of the risks associated with COVID-19. Vaccine hesitancy was not associated with educational level, age or gender but rather with lack of confidence in vaccine efficacy and concerns about safety. HDP were quite skeptical about the healthcare system but generally trusted scientists.

Aspergillus terreus, a saprophytic fungus, is recognized as an emerging pathogen responsible for various infections in human beings. However, bone and joint involvement is uncommon. We report a rare case of A. terreus spondylodiscitis in a 20-year-old male with a past history of recurrent, incompletely treated pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical signs at the time of admission included cough, low-grade fever, general weakness and left-sided back pain. Histological examination of spinal biopsy samples revealed lesions of necrosis, granulomatous inflammation and septate hyphae with acute-angle branching. A. terreus was recovered from culture. The patient received antifungal therapy with voriconazole plus caspofungin and underwent surgical debridement. Further investigations revealed no cause of primary immunodeficiency such as chronic granulomatous disease, severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome or disorders of the IL-12/IFNγ signaling pathway. Moreover, HIV serological tests resulted negative and the patient was not under immunosuppressive therapy. Unfortunately, owing to precarity and medication non-adherence, vertebral sequelae occurred. This new report emphasizes the need to consider a fungal infection in patients with spondylodiscitis, regardless of the immune status.