We conducted a genome-wide association study for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) in 401 affected individuals and 1,323 controls, with replication in an independent sample of 793 NSCL/P triads. We report two new loci associated with NSCL/P at 17q22 (rs227731, combined P = 1.07 × 10 −8 , relative risk in homozygotes = 1.84, 95% CI 1.34-2.53) and 10q25.3 (rs7078160, combined P = 1.92 × 10 −8 , relative risk in homozygotes = 2.17, 95% CI 1.32-3.56).NSCL/P is one of the most common human birth defects. In European populations, NSCL/P has a prevalence ranging from 1 in 700 to 1 in 1,000. We recently reported a susceptibility locus for NSCL/P at chromo some 8q24.21 from a genome wide association study in 224 individuals with NSCL/P (cases) and 383 population based controls 1 . This locus is the second susceptibility locus to have been unequivocally identified for NSCL/P to date, the first being the IRF6 locus 2 .To identify additional cleft susceptibility loci, we enlarged our sample by genotyping an additional set of 177 NSCL/P cases and adding the genotypes of 940 population based controls of central European origin. Genotyping was performed using Illumina BeadChips (Human610 Quad and HumanHap 550k).Following quality control (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1), association analysis of 521,288 SNPs having a minor allele frequency (MAF) of ≥1% in controls was performed in 399 cases and 1,318 controls.After excluding markers from the previously described 8q24.21 locus, 20 SNPs with P < 10 −5 remained. Five chromosomal loci (8q12.3, 10q25.3, 13q31.1, 15q13.3 and 17q22) were located within these 20 top SNPs, and the associations at these loci were further supported by at least three more SNPs with P < 10 −4 ( Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Two additional regions were considered to be promising NSCL/P susceptibility loci (6p22.1, 11q14.2), as they contained at least four markers with P < 10 −4 .To replicate the genome wide association study (GWAS) findings, we selected the 20 top SNPs (P < 10 −5 ) as well as additional backup markers for each of the seven previously mentioned loci, resulting in two replication assays. We included additional SNPs with P < 10 −4 in the two replication assays, giving highest priority to SNPs with the lowest P values. Thus, a total of 56 markers were genotyped in a replication sample of 793 NSCL/P triads of European origin. Genotyping using matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI TOF) mass spectrometry (Sequenom Inc.) was successful for 45 markers (representing 32 different loci), which were then analyzed by the transmission disequilibrium test in 665 triads (128 triads were excluded after quality control, Supplementary Methods).Of the 45 SNPs successfully genotyped, 11 (representing six differ ent loci) showed P < 0.05 in the replication sample (Supplementary Table 2). Two of these SNPs remained significant after correction for multiple testing by a conservative Bonferroni procedure (17q22: rs227731, P corr ...

We conducted a genome-wide association study involving 224 cases and 383 controls of Central European origin to identify susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). A 640-kb region at chromosome 8q24.21 was found to contain multiple markers with highly significant evidence for association with the cleft phenotype, including three markers that reached genome-wide significance. The 640-kb cleft-associated region was saturated with 146 SNP markers and then analyzed in our entire NSCL/P sample of 462 unrelated cases and 954 controls. In the entire sample, the most significant SNP (rs987525) had a P value of 3.34 x 10(-24). The odds ratio was 2.57 (95% CI = 2.02-3.26) for the heterozygous genotype and 6.05 (95% CI = 3.88-9.43) for the homozygous genotype. The calculated population attributable risk for this marker is 0.41, suggesting that this study has identified a major susceptibility locus for NSCL/P.

We have conducted the first meta-analyses for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) using data from the two largest genome-wide association studies published to date. We confirmed associations with all previously identified loci and identified six additional susceptibility regions (1p36, 2p21, 3p11.1, 8q21.3, 13q31.1 and 15q22). Analysis of phenotypic variability identified the first specific genetic risk factor for NSCLP (nonsyndromic cleft lip plus palate) (rs8001641; PNSCLP = 6.51 × 10−11; homozygote relative risk = 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–3.16).

Our objective was to evaluate the frequency and type of malformations associated with gastroschisis in a large pool of international data, to identify malformation patterns, and to evaluate the role of maternal age in non-isolated cases. Case-by-case information from 24 registries, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR), were evaluated. After the exclusion of other abdominal wall defects cases were classified as: (a) isolated; (b) recognizable syndrome, chromosomal or not; (c) multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Our results showed that out of 3,322 total cases 469 non-isolated cases were registered (14.1%): 41 chromosomal syndromes, 24 other syndromes, and 404 MCA. Among MCA four groups of anomalies were most frequent: CNS (4.5%), cardio-vascular (2.5%), limb (2.2%), and kidney anomalies (1.9%). No similar patterns emerged except two patterns resembling limb-body wall complex and OEIS. In both of them the gastroschisis could be however misclassified. Chromosomal trisomies and possibly non-syndromic MCA are associated with an older maternal age more than isolated cases. On consideration of our data and the most valid studies published in the literature, the best estimate of the proportion of gastroschisis associated with major unrelated defects is about 10%, with a few cases associated to recognizable syndromes. Recognized syndromes with gastroschisis seem to be so exceptional that the well documented and validated cases are worth being published as interesting case report. An appropriate case definition in etiological studies should include only isolated gastroschisis after an appropriate definition of isolated and non-isolated cases and a thorough case-by-case review.

New technology enables expansion of newborn screening (NBS) of inborn errors aimed to prevent adverse outcome. In conditions with a large share of asymptomatic phenotypes, the potential harm created by NBS must carefully be weighed against benefit. Policies vary throughout the United States, Australia, and Europe due to limited data on outcome and treatability of candidate screening conditions. We elaborated the rationale for decision making in 3-methylcrotonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) carboxylase deficiency (MCCD), which afflicts leucine catabolism, with reported outcomes ranging from asymptomatic to death. In Bavaria, we screened 677,852 neonates for 25 conditions, including MCCD, based on elevated concentrations of 3-hydroxyisovalerylcarnitine (3-HIVA-C). Genotypes of MCCA (MCCC1) and MCCB (MCCC2) were assessed in identified newborns, their relatives, and in individuals (n = 17) from other regions, and correlated to biochemical and clinical phenotypes. NBS revealed eight newborns and six relatives with MCCD, suggesting a higher frequency than previously assumed (1:84,700). We found a strikingly heterogeneous spectrum of 22 novel and eight reported mutations. Allelic variants were neither related to biochemical nor anamnestic data of our probands showing all asymptomatic or benign phenotypes. Comparative analysis of case reports with NBS data implied that only few individuals (< 10%) develop symptoms. In addition, none of the symptoms reported so far can clearly be attributed to MCCD. MCCD is a genetic condition with low clinical expressivity and penetrance. It largely represents as nondisease. So far, there are no genetic or biochemical markers that would identify the few individuals potentially at risk for harmful clinical expression. The low ratio of benefit to harm was pivotal to the decision to exclude MCCD from NBS in Germany. MCCD may be regarded as exemplary of the ongoing controversy arising from the inclusion of potentially asymptomatic conditions, which generates a psychological burden for afflicted families and a financial burden for health care systems.