Real-time delivery-specific QA during radiotherapy of moving targets was demonstrated for the first time. It allows supervision of treatment accuracy and action on treatment discrepancy within 2 s with high sensitivity and specificity.

No abstract

An in-house developed program for real-time reconstruction of motion-induced dose errors, DoseTracker, was extended to handle rotational target motion in addition to the previously implemented translational motion, and applied offline for prostate VMAT treatments. For translational motion, the motion-induced errors of DoseTracker were in good agreement with ground truth dose reconstructions performed in a commercial treatment planning system. For rotational motion, no ground truth was available, but DoseTracker showed that the VMAT dose is highly robust against static interfractional rotations but quite sensitive to dynamic intrafraction rotations due to interplay effects between target motion and machine motion.

Purpose: In radiotherapy, tumor motion may deteriorate the planned dose distribution. However, the dosimetric consequences of the motion are normally unknown for individual treatments. We here present a method for real-time motion-including tumor dose reconstruction and demonstrate its use for simulated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of patients with liver cancer previously treated with Calypso-guided gating. Methods: Real-time motion-including dose reconstruction was performed using in-house developed software, DoseTracker, on offline replays of previous clinical treatments. The patient cohort consisted of fifteen patients previously treated in our clinic with three-fraction SBRT to the liver using conformal or IMRT plans. The tumor motion at treatment was monitored with implanted electromagnetic transponders. The dose reconstruction was performed for both the actual gated treatments and simulated nongated treatments using a 21 Hz data stream containing accelerator parameters and the recorded motion. The dose was reconstructed in the same calculation points within the planning target volume (PTV) as used by the treatment planning system (TPS). The reconstructed doses were compared with calculations performed in the TPS, in which the motion was modeled as a series of isocenter shifts. The comparison included point doses as a function of treatment time and the dose volume histogram (DVH) for the clinical target volume (CTV). The motion-induced reduction in the dose to 95% of the CTV, DD 95% , and in the mean CTV dose, DD Mean , was compared between DoseTracker and the TPS for each simulated fraction. DoseTracker currently assumes water density within the patient contour, so for comparison, the TPS calculations were performed with both CT density and water density. The calculation times were additionally analyzed. Results: Dose reconstruction was carried out for ninety SBRT sessions with calculation volumes ranging from 9.9 to 366.4 cm 3 and median calculation times of 55-155 ms (equivalent to 18.2-6.5 Hz). Time-resolved trends of doses to a single calculation point in the patient were well replicated and dose differences between actual and planned calculations matched well. DD Mean had a range of À0.1%-30.7%-points and was estimated by DoseTracker with a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) to the TPS calculations of 0.43%-points (water density) and 0.79%-points (CT density). Similarly, DD 95% had a range of 0.0%-35.2%-points and was estimated by Dose-Tracker with an RMSD of 0.80%-points (water density) and 1.33%-points (CT density). Dose-Tracker predicted losses in tumor dose coverage above 5%-points with high sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (97.6%). Conclusions: Real-time dose reconstruction to moving tumors was demonstrated on offline replays of previous clinical treatments. DVHs of actually delivered dose are made available immediately after the end of treatment fractions. It shows promising results for liver SBRT with accurate estimation of

This study validates a method of fast motion-including dose reconstruction for proton pencil beam scanning in the liver. The method utilizes a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) and calculates the delivered dose for any translational 3D target motion. Data from ten liver patients previously treated with photon radiotherapy with intrafraction tumour motion monitoring were used. The dose reconstruction method utilises an in-house developed program to incorporate beam's-eye-view tumour motion by shifting each spot in the opposite direction of the tumour and in-depth motion as beam energy changes for each spot. The doses are then calculated on a single CT phase in the TPS. Two aspects of the dose reconstruction were assessed: 1) The accuracy of reconstruction, by comparing dose reconstructions created using 4DCT motion with ground truth doses obtained by calculating phase specific doses in all 4DCT phases and summing up these partial doses. 2)The error caused by assuming 4DCT motion, by comparing reconstructions with 4DCT motion and actual tumour motion. The CTV homogeneity index (HI) and the root-mean-square (rms) dose error for all dose points receiving >70%, >80% and >90% of the prescribed dose were calculated. The dose reconstruction resulted in mean (range) absolute CTV HI errors of 1.0% (0.0 -3.0)% and rms dose errors of 2.5% (1.0 -5.3%), 2.1% (0.9 -4.5%), and 1.8% (0.7 -3.7%) for >70%, >80% and >90% doses, respectively, when compared with the ground truth. The assumption of 4DCT motion resulted in mean (range) absolute CTV HI errors of 5.9% (0.0-15.0)% and rms dose errors of 6.3% (3.9-12.6%), 5.9% (3.4-12.5%), and 5.4% (2.6-12.1%) for >70%, >80% and >90% doses, respectively. The investigated method allows tumour dose reconstruction with the actual tumour motion and results in significantly smaller dose errors than those caused by assuming that motion at treatment is identical to the 4DCT motion.