No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020 with major health consequences. While a need to disseminate information to the medical community and general public was paramount, concerns have been raised regarding the scientific rigor in published reports. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the methodological quality of currently available COVID-19 studies compared to historical controls. A total of 9895 titles and abstracts were screened and 686 COVID-19 articles were included in the final analysis. Comparative analysis of COVID-19 to historical articles reveals a shorter time to acceptance (13.0[IQR, 5.0–25.0] days vs. 110.0[IQR, 71.0–156.0] days in COVID-19 and control articles, respectively; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, methodological quality scores are lower in COVID-19 articles across all study designs. COVID-19 clinical studies have a shorter time to publication and have lower methodological quality scores than control studies in the same journal. These studies should be revisited with the emergence of stronger evidence.

orldwide, 100 million patients aged 45 years and older undergo inpatient noncardiac surgery each year. 1,2 Although surgery has the potential to improve and prolong quality and duration of life, it is also associated with complications and mortality. During the last several decades, advances in perioperative care have included less invasive surgery, improved anesthetic techniques, enhanced intraoperative monitoring and more rapid mobilization after surgery. 2 At the same time, the age and the number of comorbidities of patients undergoing surgery have increased substantially. 3,4 Hence, in the current context, the frequency and timing of mortality is uncertain, as is the relation between perioperative complications to mortality. In a large prospective study (The Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation [VISION] Study), we systematically followed patients who underwent noncardiac surgery and documented perioperative complications and death. Our a priori objectives included establishing the frequency and timing of death after noncardiac surgery, and the association between perioperative complications and postsurgical death. Methods Study design, population and data We previously reported details of the study design and methods. 5,6 VISION was an international, prospective cohort study. Patients were included if they were aged 45 years or older, had undergone noncardiac surgery, had received general or regional anesthesia and remained in hospital for at least 1 night after surgery. Patients were recruited at 28 centres in 14 countries in

Background: Observational studies have suggested that accelerated surgery is associated with improved outcomes in patients with a hip fracture. The HIP ATTACK trial assessed whether accelerated surgery could reduce mortality and major complications. Methods:We randomised 2970 patients from 69 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients with a hip fracture that required surgery and were ≥45 years of age were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to accelerated surgery (goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis; 1487 patients) or standard care (1483 patients). The co-primary outcomes were 1.) mortality, and 2.) a composite of major complications (i.e., mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, pneumonia, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding) at 90 days after randomisation. Outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, and patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02027896. Findings:The median time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery was 6 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 4-9) in the accelerated-surgery group and 24 hours (IQR 10-42) in the standard-care group, p<0.0001. Death occurred in 140 patients (9%) assigned to accelerated surgery and 154 patients (10%) assigned to standard care; hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.72-1.14; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 1%, 95% CI -1-3%; p=0.40. The primary composite outcome occurred in 321 patients (22%) randomised to accelerated surgery and 331 patients (22%) randomised to standard care; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.13; ARR 1%, 95% CI -2-3%; p=0.71.Interpretation: Among patients with a hip fracture, accelerated surgery did not significantly lower the risk of mortality or a composite of major complications compared to standard care.

Checkpoint inhibitors are a first-line therapy for advanced melanoma, though their use is limited by diarrhea and colitis. The aim of our study was to determine the risk of these toxicities associated with immunotherapy in advanced melanoma. Electronic databases were searched through June 2017 for prospective studies reporting the risk of diarrhea and colitis in advanced melanoma treated with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. Standardized definitions assessed the grade of diarrhea and colitis. Pooled incidence and weighted relative risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random effects model. Eighteen studies were included: 6 studies (1537 patients) with PD-1 inhibitors and 15 studies (3116 patients) with CTLA-4 inhibitors. The incidence of all-grade diarrhea was 13.7% (95% CI, 10.1%-17.2%) for anti-PD-1 and 35.4% (95% CI, 30.4%-40.5%) for anti-CTLA-4. The incidence of all-grade colitis was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.4%) for anti-PD-1, and 8.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-11.5%) for anti-CTLA-4. When PD-1 inhibitors were compared directly with CTLA-4 inhibitors, the relative risk of all-grade diarrhea was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.43-0.77), and the relative risk of all-grade colitis was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.05-0.51). The rate of therapy discontinuation was numerically higher for anti-CTLA-4 therapy compared with anti-PD-1 therapy. Finally, 2 studies compared combination immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 therapy alone. The relative risk of developing all-grade diarrhea and colitis with combination therapy was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.57) and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.73-1.99), respectively. Diarrhea and colitis are frequent toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitors, and seem to be most common with CTLA-4 inhibitors.