ARS-CoV-2 is the causal agent for COVID-19, and the World Health Organization classifies this virus as an airborne pathogen transmitted by asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic individuals through close contact via exposure to infected droplets and aerosols 1,2 . Although SARS-CoV-2 transmission can occur by activities involving the oral cavity, such as speaking, breathing, coughing, sneezing and even singing [3][4][5] , most attention has focused on the nasal-lung axis of infection 6 . Oral manifestations, such as taste loss, dry mouth and oral lesions, are evident in about half of COVID-19 cases [7][8][9] , although it remains unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect and replicate in oral tissues, such as the salivary glands (SGs) or mucosa. This is critical because, if these are sites of early infection, they could play an important role in transmitting the virus to the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract via saliva, as has been suggested for other microbial-associated diseases, such as pneumonia 10 and inflammatory bowel diseases 11,12 (Extended Data Fig. 1a).SARS-CoV-2 uses host entry factors, such as ACE2 and TMPRSS family members (TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4) 13,14 , and understanding the cell types that harbor these receptors is important for determining infection susceptibilities throughout the body [15][16][17] . ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression has been reported in oral tissues 18,19 ; however, there are no comprehensive descriptions of viral entry factor expression nor direct confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in oral tissues. We hypothesized that SGs and barrier epithelia of the oral cavity and oropharynx can be infected by SARS-CoV-2 and contribute to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. To test this, we generated two human oral single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) atlases to predict cell-specific susceptibilities to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We confirmed ACE2 and TMPRSS expression in SGs and oral mucosa epithelia. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed using autopsy and outpatient samples. Saliva from asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 demonstrated the potential for viral transmission. In a prospective clinical cohort, we found a positive correlation between salivary viral load and taste loss; we also demonstrated persistent salivary antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins. ResultsOral tissue atlases reveal resident immune cells and niche-specific epithelial diversity. The SGs and the barrier mucosa of the oral cavity and oropharynx are likely gateways for viral infection, replication SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva

BHK-21 fibroblasts contain type III vimentin/desmin intermediate filament (IF)proteins that typically coisolate and co-cycle in in vitro experiments with certain high molecular weight proteins. Here, we report purification of one of these and demonstrate that it is in fact the type VI IF protein nestin. Nestin is expressed in several fibroblastic but not epithelioid cell lines. We show that nestin forms homodimers and homotetramers but does not form IF by itself in vitro. In mixtures, nestin preferentially co-assembles with purified vimentin or the type IV IF protein ␣-internexin to form heterodimer coiled-coil molecules. These molecules may co-assemble into 10 nm IF provided that the total amount of nestin does not exceed about 25%. However, nestin does not dimerize with types I/II keratin IF chains. The bulk of the nestin protein consists of a long carboxyl-terminal tail composed of various highly charged peptide repeats. By analogy with the larger neurofilament chains, we postulate that these sequences serve as cross-bridgers or spacers between IF and/or other cytoskeletal constituents. In this way, we propose that direct incorporation of modest amounts of nestin into the backbone of cytoplasmic types III and IV IFs affords a simple yet flexible method for the regulation of their dynamic supramolecular organization and function in cells.

MicroRNAs (miRs) seem to mediate renal fibrosis in several renal diseases, with some miRs having profibrotic effects and others having opposing effects. Although differential expression of certain miRs has been described in lupus nephritis, it is unknown whether miRs contribute to fibrosis or could serve as biomarkers of specific histologic manifestations of lupus nephritis. Here, we compared miR expression in kidney biopsies from patients with lupus nephritis and identified miR-150 as the most differentially expressed miR in kidneys with high chronicity (chronicity index [CI] $4); miR-150 positively correlated with chronicity scores and the expression of profibrotic proteins. Overexpression of miR-150 significantly reduced expression of the antifibrotic protein suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and upregulated profibrotic proteins in both proximal tubular and mesangial cells. Directly targeting SOCS1 with a small interfering RNA produced similar results. Furthermore, TGF-b1 induced miR-150 expression, decreased SOCS1, and increased profibrotic proteins in proximal tubular cells and podocytes; a miR-150 inhibitor reversed these changes, suggesting that the profibrotic effects of TGF-b1 are, at least in part, mediated by miR-150. Consistent with these in vitro observations, biopsies with high miR-150 and high CI exhibited substantial expression of TGF-b1, reduced SOCS1, and an increase in profibrotic proteins. In summary, miR-150 is a promising quantitative renal biomarker of kidney injury in lupus nephritis. Our results suggest that miR-150 promotes renal fibrosis by increasing profibrotic molecules through downregulation of SOCS1.