No abstract

No abstract

We experimentally tested the hypothesis that three-dimensional structural clutter is a major factor affecting habitat choice by insectivorous bats. To do this we artificially increased clutter at two sites used by bats without affecting prey availability. Our measure of available insect prey did not differ between treatment and control sites, indicating that only the spatial complexity of the habitat type was manipulated. Artificial clutter negatively affected foraging activity by small bats (Myotis spp.), supporting the hypothesis that physical clutter does affect foraging by bats. In direct contrast to our expectation, large bats (Eptesicus fuscus, Lasiurus cinereus, Lasionycteris noctivagans) were apparently unaffected by the clutter treatment. We suggest that this may be an artifact of our experimental design, because our ultrasonic detectors probably recorded large bats flying above the artificial clutter.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management.

Riparian areas are generally assumed to represent important foraging areas for insectivorous bats, but this contention has rarely been formally quantified. To test this assumption, we used bat detectors to compare the relative activity levels of a community of temperate-zone bat species between riparian (lake) and upland (cutblock) habitats at three different elevations (ranging from 540 to 1800 m) in a forested area of southern British Columbia. In addition, we also investigated the sex and age class distributions of bats (based on mist-net captures) between riparian and upland habitats among the elevational zones. Bat activity levels were significantly greater in riparian than upland areas (10 and 40 times greater for foraging and commuting activity, respectively). Capture rates were greater in riparian areas and biased towards females, suggesting that female bats may preferentially select riparian areas, probably because of the abundant prey resources typically associated with this habitat. Captures of females also predominated at lower elevations, whereas males were captured more often in higher elevation zones. Our data support the assumption that riparian habitats represent important foraging and probably drinking areas for bats. The sex bias and differences in capture rates and activity levels need to be considered when designing bat surveys in different habitat types or over elevational gradients.