To obtain baseline data for human papillomavirus (HPV) screening and vaccination in Japan, we analyzed HPV DNA data from 2282 Japanese women ( P ersistent infection with oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV), most commonly types 16 and 18, leads to cervical cancer, the second most common cancer in women worldwide.(1) Therefore, oncogenic HPV testing combined with cytology was approved for primary screening in the USA, because of sensitivity and cost-effectiveness.(2) In addition, HPV vaccines have been licensed in the USA, Australia, and European and other countries, because of their efficacy and safety. Clinical studies of HPV vaccines have demonstrated close to 100% protection against HPV16-and HPV18-related infections and diseases, (3)(4)(5) implying possible cross-protection against HPV45, HPV31, and HPV52.(4,5) Based on evidence from clinical trials, (3)(4)(5)(6)(7) these two tools targeting HPV (detection assay and vaccine) are becoming increasingly attractive for cervical cancer prevention worldwide. In Japan, however, HPV DNA testing is still unavailable in mass screening and no HPV vaccine has yet been licensed. Type-specific and age-related data of HPV prevalence, both for women with normal cytology and for women with cervical diseases, are prerequisites to make a well-judged decision about the future role of HPV screening and vaccination in cervical cancer prevention, but these data are missing in Japan. A meta-analysis of Japanese HPV studies provided representative data of HPV type distribution, but no information about age-specific prevalence.In the present study, we analyzed HPV DNA data from 2282 Japanese women to obtain the prevalence data of HPV among women across a broad age range. Our data may help provide models for further evaluating potential impact and cost effectiveness of HPV screening and vaccination in Japan. Materials and MethodsStudy subjects. Our study subjects consisted of 2282 Japanese women (1517 normal HPV detection and genotyping. Exfoliated cells from the ectocervix and endocervix were collected into a tube containing 1 mL PBS and stored at -30°C until DNA extraction. We detected HPV DNA in cervical samples by PCR-based methodology described previously.(9) In brief, total cellular DNA was extracted from cervical samples by a standard sodium dodecyl sulfateproteinase K procedure. HPV DNA was amplified by PCR using consensus primers (L1C1 and L1C2 + L1C2 M) for the HPV L1 region. Direct comparisons of HPV detection methodology have demonstrated that the sensitivity of our PCR assay is higher than that of PCR assays using MY09 and MY11 and GP17 and GP18 primers. (10,11) A reaction mixture without template DNA was included in every set of PCR runs as a negative control. Also, primers for a fragment of the β-actin gene were used as a control to rule out false-negative results for samples in which HPV DNA was not detected. To avoid contamination, we used disposable utensils and discarded them after a single use. We also used aliquoted reagents and maintained separate locations ...

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

No abstract

No abstract

Polymorphisms in cytokine genes can influence immune responses to human papillomavirus infection, possibly modifying risks of cervical cancer. Using an amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction method, we analyzed a single nucleotide polymorphism (A/G) at position -1082 in interleukin-10 promoter region in 440 Japanese women: 173 women with normal cytology, 163 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and 104 women with invasive cervical cancer. The carrier frequency of interleukin-10 -1082 G alleles associated with higher interleukin-10 production increased with disease severity: 9.8% for normal cytology; 19.6% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 29.8% for invasive cervical cancer (P for trend < 0.001). Among cytologically normal women, human papillomavirus infections were more common in those who were positive for an interleukin-10 -1082 G allele (P = 0.04). In conclusion, our data suggest that interleukin-10 -1082 gene polymorphism may serve as a marker of genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer among Japanese women.