To cite this article: Douxfils J, Ageno W, Samama C-M, Lessire S, ten Cate H, Verhamme P, Dogn e J-M, Mullier F. Laboratory testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for clinicians. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16: 209-19. Click to hear Dr Baglin's perspective on the role of the laboratory in treatment with new oral anticoagulants Summary. One of the key benefits of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is that they do not require routine laboratory monitoring. Nevertheless, assessment of DOAC exposure and anticoagulant effects may become useful in various clinical scenarios. The five approved DOACs (apixaban, betrixaban, dabigatran etexilate, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) have different characteristics impacting assay selection and the interpretation of results. This article provides an updated overview on (i) which test to use (and their advantages and limitations), (ii) when to assay DOAC levels, (iii) how to interpret the results relating to bleeding risk, emergency situations and perioperative management, and (iv) what is the impact of DOACs on routine and specialized coagulation assays. Assays for anti-Xa or anti-IIa activity are the preferred methods when quantitative information is useful, although the situations in which to test for DOAC levels are still debated. Different reagent sensitivities and variabilities in laboratory calibrations impact assay results. International calibration standards for all specific tests for each DOAC are needed to reduce the inter-laboratory variability and allow inter-study comparisons. The impact of the DOACs on hemostasis testing may cause falsepositive or false-negative results; however, these can be minimized by using specific assays and collecting blood samples at trough concentrations. Finally, prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the safety and efficacy of proposed laboratory thresholds in relation to clinical decisions. We offer recommendations on the tests to use for measuring DOACs and practical guidance on laboratory testing to help patient management and avoid diagnostic errors.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. AbstractBackground: Thrombin generation testing has been used to provide information on the coagulation phenotype of patients. The most used technique is the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) but it suffers from a lack of standardization, preventing its implementation in routine. The ST Genesia is a new analyzer designed to assess thrombin generation based on the same principle as the CAT. Unlike the CAT system, the ST Genesia is a benchtop, fully automated analyzer, able to perform the analyses individually and not by batch, with strict control of variables such as temperature and volumes, ensuring, theoretically, maximal reproducibility. Objectives:This study aimed at assessing the performance of the STG-DrugScreen application on the ST Genesia analyzer. We also aimed at exploring stability of plasma samples after freezing and defining a reference normal range. Results:Results demonstrated the excellent interexperiment precision of the ST Genesia and confirmed that the use of a reference plasma helps reducing the

The impact of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on laboratory assays used for thrombophilia testing (e.g., antithrombin, protein S, protein C, lupus anticoagulant and activated protein-C resistance) is a well-known issue and may cause false-positive and -negative results. Therefore, the correct interpretation of tests that are performed in patients taking DOACs is mandatory to prevent misclassification and the subsequent clinical consequences. We aimed at evaluating the efficiency of a new and simple procedure (DOAC-Stop®; Haematex Research, Hornsby, Australia) to overcome the effect of all DOACs in real-life settings and to assess the percentage of erroneous results due to the presence of DOACs on thrombophilia screening tests. For this purpose, 135 DOAC-treated patients (38 apixaban, 40 dabigatran, 15 edoxaban, and 42 rivaroxaban) and 20 control patients were enrolled. A significant drop in apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations following the DOAC-Stop® treatment was observed (74.8–8.2 ng/mL [p < 0.0001], 95.9–4.7 ng/mL [p < 0.0001], 102.1–8.8 ng/mL [p = 0.001], and 111.3–7.0 ng/mL [p < 0.0001], respectively). The DOAC-Stop® treatment was mostly effective to overcome the effect of DOACs on PTT-LA, dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) screen, and dRVVT confirm tests. Using our procedures, false-positive results due to DOACs were observed only with lupus anticoagulant tests (up to 75%) and fell to zero after the DOAC-Stop® procedure, regardless of the DOAC considered. In conclusion, the DOAC-Stop® adsorbent procedure appeared to be an effective and simple way to overcome the interference of DOAC on coagulation tests and should facilitate the interpretation of thrombophilia screening tests in patients taking DOACs.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been licensed worldwide for several years for various indications. Each year, 10–15% of patients on oral anticoagulants will undergo an invasive procedure and expert groups have issued several guidelines on perioperative management in such situations. The perioperative guidelines have undergone numerous updates as clinical experience of emergency management has increased and perioperative studies including measurement of residual anticoagulant levels have been published. The high inter-patient variability of DOAC plasma levels has challenged the traditional recommendation that perioperative DOAC interruption should be based only on the elimination half-life of DOACs, especially before invasive procedures carrying a high risk of bleeding. Furthermore, recent publications have highlighted the potential danger of heparin bridging use when DOACs are stopped before an invasive procedure.As antidotes are progressively becoming available to manage severe bleeding or urgent procedures in patients on DOACs, accurate laboratory tests have become the standard to guide their administration and their actions need to be well understood by clinicians.This review aims to provide a systematic approach to managing patients on DOACs, based on recent updates of various perioperative guidance, and highlighting the advantages and limits of recommendations based on pharmacokinetic properties and laboratory tests.

No abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with extreme inflammatory response, disordered hemostasis and high thrombotic risk. A high incidence of thromboembolic events has been reported despite thromboprophylaxis, raising the question of a more effective anticoagulation. First-line hemostasis tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimers are proposed for assessing thrombotic risk and monitoring hemostasis, but are vulnerable to many drawbacks affecting their reliability and clinical relevance. Specialized hemostasis-related tests (soluble fibrin complexes, tests assessing fibrinolytic capacity, viscoelastic tests, thrombin generation) may have an interest to assess the thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19. Another challenge for the hemostasis laboratory is the monitoring of heparin treatment, especially unfractionated heparin in the setting of an extreme inflammatory response. This review aimed at evaluating the role of hemostasis tests in the management of COVID-19 and discussing their main limitations.

BACKGROUND Dabigatran etexilate has received its market authorization for various indications worldwide. It was developed to be used in fixed dose regimens without the need of regular monitoring. However, the perioperative management of dabigatran could require an assessment of the drug plasma levels to ensure a safe use of the product, especially in absence of specific antidotes. The EMA stated that dabigatran concentrations under 48 ng/mL should be reached before invasive intervention. The GIHP put the threshold at 30 ng/mL. Therefore, a specific laboratory assay, accurate in the low concentration range, easily available and performable 24h/7 is requested but, until now, all coagulation tests dedicated to the measurement of plasma dabigatran concentrations showed a lower limit of quantitation from 30 to 50 ng/mL. This limits their perioperative utility and the thrombin time (TT) is currently presented as an alternative due to its very high sensitivity to dabigatran. This interesting approach has limitations because TT is affected by several analytical and biological variables that could lead to misinterpretations and expose the patient at riskier hemostatic conditions. In this study, we propose to investigate the performance of two coagulation tests (the Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitors LOW (HTI LOW) (Hyphen BioMed) and the Ecarin Chromogenic Assay II (ECA-II) (Diagnostica Stago)) specifically developed to measure low plasma dabigatran concentrations and to compare their results with a reference LC-MS/MS. We also assessed the performance of the standard procedure of HTI and TT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-three plasma samples of patients treated with dabigatran etexilate for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, were included in the study. Plasma samples were taken randomly and included after a first screening using the HTI to select plasma concentrations <200 ng/mL. For HTI, tested plasma was diluted 1:8 in Owren-Koller® buffer. Fifty μl of tested plasma were mixed with 100 μl of normal pooled plasma and were incubated during 240 sec. One hundred μl of highly purified human thrombin pre-incubated at 37°C was then added to start the reaction. For HTI LOW, the dilution of the sample was reduced to 1:2 and specific calibrators at lower concentrations were used. For ECA-II, tested plasma was diluted 1:5 in Owren-Koller® buffer. Fifty μl of tested plasma were mixed with 140 μl of prothrombin and then 70 µl of chromogenic substrate were added and incubated during 240 sec. Seventy μl of ecarin pre-incubated at 37°C were then added to start the reaction. Thrombin time was performed using Thrombin Time® reagent 1.5NIH (Diagnostica Stago) and the limit of measurement was extended to 300 sec. All of these procedures were performed on a STA-R Evolution® coagulometer (Diagnostica Stago). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The plasma concentrations ranged from 0 to 200 ng/mL as provided by LC-MS/MS measurements. Among these samples, 17 were between 0 and 50 ng/mL. Linear correlation, Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analyses versus LC-MS/MS are provided in Figure 1, for assays that express results in ng/mL, i.e. HTI, HTI LOW and ECA-II. For TT, the relation is described by linear correlation. Our results show that HTI LOW performs better than HTI and ECA-II on the whole concentration range providing closer correlation and a lower systematic difference compared to LC-MS/MS. For concentrations below 50 ng/mL HTI LOW and ECA-II reveal similar systematic difference with higher 95% CI for ECA-II and perform better than HTI to estimate plasma concentrations. Thrombin time is less useful than dedicated assays to provide an estimation of the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran. For concentrations above 50 ng/mL it often exceeds the limit of measurement, i.e. 120 sec as defined by the manufacturer, and is influenced by the level of fibrinogen. However, it gives an acceptable correlation for concentration below 50 ng/mL. This may help the biologist to choose which test to use to avoid unnecessary costs and ensure the use of the more accurate dedicated assay to estimate the plasma concentrations. When TT is lower than 120 sec, HTI LOW or ECA-II should be preferred to HTI. CONCLUSION We recommend the use of specific coagulation assays to assess the dabigatran plasma concentrations before invasive procedure. Thrombin time may guide the biologist on the dedicated coagulation test to perform if he uses the HTI platform. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No abstract