Background/Aim: Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak is currently having a huge impact on medical resource allocation. Breast Cancer (BC) patients are concerned both with BC treatment and COVID-19. This study aimed to estimate the impact of anxiety among patients, caused by the spreading of COVID-19. Patients and Methods: Between the 16th of January and the 20th of March 2020, we retrospectively enrolled 160 patients. Eighty-two patients with a suspected breast lesion (SBL) were divided into two groups: PRE-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-SBL. Seventy-eight BC patients were divided into PRE-COVID-19-BC and POST-COVID-19-BC. Patient characteristics including age, marital status, SBL/BC diameter, personal and family history of BC, clinical stage and molecular subtype were recorded. Procedure Refusal (PR) and Surgical Refusal (SR) were also recorded with their reason. Results: BC and SBL analysis showed no difference in pre-treatment characteristics (p>0.05). Both POST-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-BC groups showed higher rates of PR and SR (p=0.0208, p=0.0065 respectively). Infection risk represented primary reason for refusal among POST-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: COVID-19-related anxiety could affect patients' decisionmaking process. Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) has emerged as a highly contagious human pathogen. On March 20, 2020 more than 234000 cases were confirmed worldwide , with more than 9800 registered deaths (1). Following the initial outbreak in the Chinese Hubei Province on March 11, WHO has labelled the latest coronavirus disease COVID-19 (caused by SARS-COV-2) as a pandemic. The reported fatality rate is 4.2% globally (1, 2). Human to human transmission occurs through direct contact or air droplets (2) placing health care providers at a high risk due to the close proximity to potentially infected patients (3). Preliminary data of nationwide analysis in China demonstrated cancer as a risk factor for developing severe complications/disease course among COVID-19 patients (4, 5). Although further studies are required in order to accurately estimate the risk (6, 7) among patients who underwent chemotherapy or surgery in the months prior to the outbreak, the risk of developing severe conditions seems considerably higher compared to the general population (6). Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm worldwide representing the primary cause of death due to neoplasms in Italy (5). A report published in 2017 stated that more than 50% of BC patients were older than 60 years (8). Therefore, due to the higher risk of adverse events in older patients, underlined in the preliminary data (9), it is essential to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 infection among these frail BC patients (10). Furthermore, during the COVID-19 outbreak, hospital resources are reallocated from elective and semi-elective procedures to meet the needs of COVID-19 patients in critical conditions (11). The subsequent scarcity of resources could potentially delay diagnostic evaluations and treatment of BC ...

Chron’s Disease is a chronic inflammatory intestinal disease, first described at the beginning of the last century. The disease is characterized by the alternation of periods of flares and remissions influenced by a complex pathogenesis in which inflammation plays a key role. Crohn’s disease evolution is mediated by a complex alteration of the inflammatory response which is characterized by alterations of the innate immunity of the intestinal mucosa barrier together with a remodeling of the extracellular matrix through the expression of metalloproteins and increased adhesion molecules expression, such as MAcCAM-1. This reshaped microenvironment enhances leucocytes migration in the sites of inflammation, promoting a TH1 response, through the production of cytokines such as IL-12 and TNF-α. IL-12 itself and IL-23 have been targeted for the medical treatment of CD. Giving the limited success of medical therapies, the treatment of the disease is invariably surgical. This review will highlight the role of inflammation in CD and describe the surgical approaches for the prevention of the almost inevitable recurrence.

Background/Aim: Despite the large amount of clinical data available of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), not many studies have been conducted about the psychological toll on Health Care Workers (HCWs). Patients and Methods: In this multicentric descriptive study, surveys were distributed among 4 different Breast Cancer Centers (BCC). BCCs were distinguished according to COVID-19 tertiary care hospital (COVID/No-COVID) and district prevalence (DP) (High vs. Low). DASS-21 score, PSS score and demographic data (age, sex, work) were evaluated. Results: A total of 51 HCWs were analyzed in the study. Age, work and sex did not demonstrate statistically significant values. Statistically significant distribution was found between DASS-21-stress score and COVID/No-COVID (p=0.043). No difference was found in the remaining DASS-21 and PSS scores, dividing the HCWs according to COVID-19-hospital and DP. Conclusion: Working in a COVID-19-hospital represents a factor that negatively affects psychosocial wellbeing. However, DP seems not to affect the psychosocial well-being of BCC HCWs. During the outbreak, psychological support for low risk HCWs should be provided regardless DP. The first case of atypical pneumonia previously named as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (COVID-19) was recorded in December 2019 in China. Italy has been the first European country to be involved in this outbreak. The national health care system (NHS) is currently reallocating resources from elective and semi-elective patients toward severe COVID-19 patients (1, 2). Italy has exceeded the cases recorded in China and unfortunately, up to now (May, 17th), 225,435 cases and 31908 deaths have been registered with still over 700 admitted to intensive care units (3). The Italian outbreak is mainly located in clusters along the north of Italy (Lombardia, Veneto and Emilia Romagna) and a low incidence in central and southern regions (1, 3, 4). In order to control COVID-19, resource reallocation eventually led to the creation of hospitals partially or totally dedicated to COVID-19 patients (COVID-hospital), therefore 1685 This article is freely accessible online.

Background: Surgical stress and anesthesia affect the patient's immune system. Analysis of the lymphocyte response after breast-conserving surgery was conducted to investigate the differences between effects after general and local anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with breast cancer were enrolled for BCS through local or general anesthesia. Total leukocytes, total lymphocytes, lymphocyte-subsets including CD3 + , CD19 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD16 + CD56 + and CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was examined at baseline and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Results: Baseline data showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Within-group ANOVA test showed significant differences for total leukocyte count (p<0.001), total lymphocyte count (p=0.009) and proportion of natural-killer cells (p=0.01) in the control group. Between-group analysis showed lower median values of total lymphocytes in the awake surgery group on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 (p=0.001, p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively) when compared to the control group. Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia had higher total lymphocyte counts on postoperative day 2 (p=0.04). Conclusion: In this randomized study, breast-conserving surgery plus local anesthesia had a lower impact on postoperative lymphocyte response when compared to the same procedure performed under general anesthesia. Lymphocytes are fundamental types of white blood cells. Cells of the lymphatic system play a crucial role in the immune system due to their regulatory function through regulatory cytokines and due to cytotoxic activity against tumors and infections (1, 2). As underlined in the literature, surgical stress and general anesthesia may reduce the numbers of circulating lymphocytes (1-6). It is a widely held view that impairment of immune function can predispose to infectious complications such as surgical site infections (SSI) (5-8). Moreover, reduced cytotoxic activity of peripheralblood lymphocytes can increase the probability of tumor progression and metastasis (4, 5, 9-13). According to several studies, use of a minimally invasive approach in thoracic surgery (1, 14, 15) and abdominal surgery (16-18) demonstrated that immune function may be better preserved. However, there is lack of high-level evidence about the protective role of minimally invasive techniques in early lymphocyte response and it is conceivable that, regardless of the surgical approach, any 1879 This article is freely accessible online.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic is having a deep impact on emergency surgical services, with a significant reduction of patients admitted into emergency surgical units world widely. Reliable figures of this reduction have not been produced yet. Our international audit aimed at giving a precise snapshot of the absolute and relative changes of emergency surgical admissions at the outbreak of the pandemic. Materials and methods Datasets of patients admitted as general surgical emergencies into 45 internationally distributed emergency surgical units during the months of March and April 2020 (Covid-19 pandemic outbreak) were collected and compared with those of patients admitted into the same units during the months of March and April 2019 (pre-Covid-19). Primary endpoint was to evaluate the relative variation of the presentation symptoms and discharge diagnoses between the two study periods. Secondary endpoint was to identify the possible change of therapeutic strategy during the same two periods. Results Forty-five centres participated sent their anonymised data to the study hub, for a total of 6263 patients. Of these, 3810 were admitted in the pre-Covid period and 2453 in the Covid period, for a 35.6% absolute reduction. The most common presentation was abdominal pain, whose incidence did not change between the two periods, but in the Covid period patients presented less frequently with anal pain, hernias, anaemia and weight loss. ASA 1 and low frailty patients were admitted less frequently, while ASA>1 and frail patients showed a relative increase. The type of surgical access did not change significantly, but lap-to-open conversion rate halved between the two study periods. Discharge diagnoses of appendicitis and diverticulitis reduced significantly, while bowel ischaemia and perianal ailments had a significant relative increase. Conclusions Our audit demonstrates a significant overall reduction of emergency surgery admissions at the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic with a minimal change of the proportions of single presentations, diagnoses and treatments. These findings may open the door to new ways of managing surgical emergencies without engulfing the already busy hospitals.