This document may be broadly used as a standard reference regarding the current state of the IVOCT imaging modality, intended for researchers and clinicians who use IVOCT and analyze IVOCT data.

AstraZeneca, Biosensors, and The Medicines Company.

BACKGROUND-During primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), manual thrombectomy may reduce distal embolization and thus improve microvascular perfusion. Small trials have suggested that thrombectomy improves surrogate and clinical outcomes, but a larger trial has reported conflicting results.

Background-Permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement is a recognized complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We assessed the UK incidence of permanent pacing within 30 days of CoreValve implantation and formulated an anatomic and electrophysiological model. Methods and Results-Data from 270 patients at 10 centers in the United Kingdom were examined. Twenty-five patients (8%) had preexisting PPMs; 2 patients had incomplete data. The remaining 243 were 81.3Ϯ6.7 years of age; 50.6% were male. QRS duration increased from 105Ϯ23 to 135Ϯ29 milliseconds (PϽ0.01). Left bundle-branch block incidence was 13% at baseline and 61% after the procedure (PϽ0.001). Eighty-one patients (33.3%) required a PPM within 30 days.Rates of pacing according to preexisting ECG abnormalities were as follows: right bundle-branch block, 65.2%; left bundle-branch block, 43.75%; normal QRS, 27.6%. Among patients who required PPM implantation, the median time to insertion was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 2.0 to 7.75 days). Multivariable analysis revealed that periprocedural atrioventricular block (odds ratio, 6.29; 95% confidence interval, 3.55 to 11.15), balloon predilatation (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 3.47), use of the larger (29 mm) CoreValve prosthesis (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 5.11), interventricular septum diameter (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 3.06), and prolonged QRS duration (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 7.40) were independently associated with the need for PPM. Conclusion-One third of patients undergoing a CoreValve transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure require a PPM within 30 days. Periprocedural atrioventricular block, balloon predilatation, use of the larger CoreValve prosthesis, increased interventricular septum diameter and prolonged QRS duration were associated with the need for PPM. (Circulation. 2011;123:951-960.)Key Words: aortic stenosis Ⅲ electrocardiography Ⅲ pacemakers Ⅲ transcatheter aortic valve Ⅲ transcatheter aortic valve implantation A ortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in Europe, 1,2 and age is a significant factor in its natural history. 2 Severe AS occurs in 2% to 4% of adults Ͼ65 years of age. 3,4 Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery for these patients when they become symptomatic or develop impaired left ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction Ͻ50%. 5,6 However, the aging population generates greater numbers of patients with severe AS and significant comorbidities, 3 prohibitively raising their perioperative risks for surgical AVR. Since the first successful implant in 2002,7 transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an increasingly common technology in this cohort. The initial surveillance has been encouraging with respect to procedural success, improvement in quality of life, and short-term and medium-term mortality. 8 -10 Clinical Perspective on p 960Aortic valvular disease is itself associated with cond...

AimWe assessed the management and outcomes of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients randomly assigned to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided management or angiography-guided standard care.Methods and resultsWe conducted a prospective, multicentre, parallel group, 1 : 1 randomized, controlled trial in 350 NSTEMI patients with ≥1 coronary stenosis ≥30% of the lumen diameter assessed visually (threshold for FFR measurement) (NCT01764334). Enrolment took place in six UK hospitals from October 2011 to May 2013. Fractional flow reserve was disclosed to the operator in the FFR-guided group (n = 176). Fractional flow reserve was measured but not disclosed in the angiography-guided group (n = 174). Fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 was an indication for revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). The median (IQR) time from the index episode of myocardial ischaemia to angiography was 3 (2, 5) days. For the primary outcome, the proportion of patients treated initially by medical therapy was higher in the FFR-guided group than in the angiography-guided group [40 (22.7%) vs. 23 (13.2%), difference 95% (95% CI: 1.4%, 17.7%), P = 0.022]. Fractional flow reserve disclosure resulted in a change in treatment between medical therapy, PCI or CABG in 38 (21.6%) patients. At 12 months, revascularization remained lower in the FFR-guided group [79.0 vs. 86.8%, difference 7.8% (−0.2%, 15.8%), P = 0.054]. There were no statistically significant differences in health outcomes and quality of life between the groups.ConclusionIn NSTEMI patients, angiography-guided management was associated with higher rates of coronary revascularization compared with FFR-guided management. A larger trial is necessary to assess health outcomes and cost-effectiveness.