Background On 7 February 2020, French Health authorities were informed of a confirmed case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in an Englishman infected in Singapore who had recently stayed in a chalet in the French Alps. We conducted an investigation to identify secondary cases and interrupt transmission. Methods We defined as a confirmed case a person linked to the chalet with a positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction sample for SARS-CoV-2. Results The index case stayed 4 days in the chalet with 10 English tourists and a family of 5 French residents; SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 5 individuals in France, 6 in England (including the index case), and 1 in Spain (overall attack rate in the chalet: 75%). One pediatric case, with picornavirus and influenza A coinfection, visited 3 different schools while symptomatic. One case was asymptomatic, with similar viral load as that of a symptomatic case. Seven days after the first cases were diagnosed, 1 tertiary case was detected in a symptomatic patient with from the chalet a positive endotracheal aspirate; all previous and concurrent nasopharyngeal specimens were negative. Additionally, 172 contacts were monitored; all contacts tested for SARS-CoV-2 (N = 73) were negative. Conclusions The occurrence in this cluster of 1 asymptomatic case with similar viral load as a symptomatic patient suggests transmission potential of asymptomatic individuals. The fact that an infected child did not transmit the disease despite close interactions within schools suggests potential different transmission dynamics in children. Finally, the dissociation between upper and lower respiratory tract results underscores the need for close monitoring of the clinical evolution of suspected cases of coronavirus disease 2019.

B enite, d the National Referee Centre for Rheumatic and AutoImmune and Systemic diseases in childrEn (RAISE), and

†The two first and senior authors contributed equally.We report here on a European cohort of 27 kidney transplant recipients displaying operational tolerance, compared to two cohorts of matched kidney transplant recipients under immunosuppression and patients who stopped immunosuppressive drugs and presented with rejection. We report that a lower proportion of operationally tolerant patients received induction therapy (52% without induction therapy vs. 78.3% [p = 0.0455] and 96.7% [p = 0.0001], respectively), a difference likely due to the higher proportion (18.5%) of HLA matched recipients in the tolerant cohort. These patients were also significantly older at the time of transplantation (p = 0.0211) and immunosuppression withdrawal (p = 0.0002) than recipients who rejected their graft after weaning. Finally, these patients were at lower risk of infectious disease. Among the 27 patients defined as operationally tolerant at the time of inclusion, 19 still display stable graft function (mean 9 ± 4 years after transplantation) whereas 30% presented slow deterioration of graft function. Six of these patients tested positive for pre-graft anti-HLA antibodies. Biopsy histology studies revealed an active immunologically driven mechanism for half of them, associated with DSA in the absence of C4d. This study suggests that operational tolerance can persist as a robust phenomenon, although eventual graft loss does occur in some patients, particularly in the setting of donor-specific alloantibody.