No abstract

The anti-CD20 mAb rituximab is central to the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but resistance remains a significant problem. We recently reported that resistance could be explained, in part, by internalization of rituximab (type I anti-CD20) from the surface of certain B-cell malignancies, thus limiting engagement of natural effectors and increasing mAb consumption. Internalization of rituximab was most evident in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but the extent of internalization was heteroge- IntroductionThe anti-CD20 mAb rituximab has improved the overall survival of patients with follicular (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). [1][2][3][4] However, in MCL, only modest responses are seen 5 and in CLL, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) therapy delivers improved responses but has yet to show a similar improvement in overall survival, 6 albeit the current follow-up is relatively short. Interestingly, those responses seen in CLL have often been achieved with high doses of rituximab, 6 suggesting that more mAb is needed to coat the targets or that it is consumed in some way. Even within rituximab-responsive lymphomas, a proportion of cases show resistance on first treatment with rituximab or eventually become resistant to rituximab-containing combination therapy (reviewed in Stolz et al 7 ). The molecular basis of this resistance and the observed sensitivity of different lymphoma subtypes is unclear (reviewed in Lim et al 8 ), but is highly relevant to improving outcomes.In addition to understanding target resistance, many groups are working to deliver anti-CD20 mAb reagents with improved affinity and more potent engagement of cytotoxic effectors. Anti-CD20 mAb can be defined as type I (eg, rituximab, ofatumumab) or type II (eg tositumumab, GA101), according to their ability to redistribute CD20 into lipid rafts in the plasma membrane and function in various effector assays. 9-11 It is still not clear what characteristics are required for the optimal reagent, but it is generally accepted that Fc:Fc ␥ receptor (Fc␥R) interactions are crucial to the efficacy of anti-CD20 mAb. [12][13][14][15] In particular, Fc␥RIIIa on myeloid effectors appears critical in controlling Ab potency and in keeping with this, lymphoma patients bearing the higher affinity 158V allele in Fc␥RIIIa respond better to rituximab compared with those with the low affinity 158F allotype, 16 leading many investigators to focus on augmenting the interaction of mAb with Fc␥RIIIa, for example via defucosylation. 17 Less attention has been given to the potential effects of the ITIM-containing inhibitory Fc␥R, Fc␥RIIb. Fc␥RIIb is a negative regulator of ITAM-containing receptors, such as the B-cell receptor (BCR) and the activatory Fc␥R. 18 Most hematopoietic cells coexpress inhibitory and activatory Fc␥R, and tumors are reported to be more sensitive to mAb immunotherapy in Fc␥RII Ϫ/Ϫ mice because of the removal of the inhibitory restraint of this receptor from myeloid effectors such as macro...

A high activatory/inhibitory FcγR binding ratio is critical for the activity of mAb such as rituximab and alemtuzumab that attack cancer cells directly and eliminate them by recruiting immune effectors. Optimal FcγR binding profiles of other anti-cancer mAb, such as immunostimulatory mAb that stimulate or block immune receptors, are less clear. In this study, we analyzed the importance of isotype and FcγR interactions in controlling the agonistic activity of the anti-mouse CD40 mAb 3/23. Mouse IgG1 (m1) and IgG2a (m2a) variants of the parental 3/23 (rat IgG2a) were engineered and used to promote humoral and cellular responses against OVA. The mouse IgG1 3/23 was highly agonistic and outperformed the parental Ab when promoting Ab (10–100-fold) and T cell (OTI and OTII) responses (2- to >10-fold). In contrast, m2a was almost completely inactive. Studies in FcγR knockout mice demonstrated a critical role for the inhibitory FcγRIIB in 3/23 activity, whereas activatory FcγR (FcγRI, -III, and -IV) was dispensable. In vitro experiments established that the stimulatory effect of FcγRIIB was mediated through Ab cross-linking delivered in trans between neighboring cells and did not require intracellular signaling. Intriguingly, activatory FcγR provided effective cross-linking of 3/23 m2a in vitro, suggesting the critical role of FcγRIIB in vivo reflects its cellular distribution and bioavailability as much as its affinity for a particular Ab isotype. In conclusion, we demonstrate an essential cross-linking role for the inhibitory FcγRIIB in anti-CD40 immunostimulatory activity and suggest that isotype will be an important issue when optimizing reagents for clinical use.

Summary In this study, we investigated the mouse dendritic cell (DC) receptor, complement receptor 4 (CR4; CD11c/CD18), as an immunotarget for triggering humoral immunity. Comparison of antibody titres generated against a panel of 13 anti‐antigen‐presenting cell receptor monoclonal antibodies, with or without conjugated ovalbumin (OVA), revealed uniquely rapid and robust responses following CR4 targeting, with antibody titres approaching 1 : 100 000 7 days after a single dose of antigen. Furthermore, using just 100 ng OVA conjugated to anti‐CD11c Fab′, we generated anti‐OVA titres greater than those produced by a 100‐fold higher dose of OVA in complete Freund’s adjuvant at day 28. These anti‐OVA antibody titres were sustained and could be boosted further with targeted OVA on day 21. Investigations to explain this vaccine potency showed that, in addition to targeting splenic DC, anti‐CDl1c antibodies delivered a powerful adjuvant effect and could boost humoral immunity against OVA even when the OVA was targeted to other molecules on DC, such as major histocompatibility complex class II, CD11a and CD11b. However, interestingly, this adjuvant effect was lost if OVA was targeted to other cells such as B cells via CD21 or CD19. The adjuvant effect was mediated through a marked enhancement of both germinal centre and extrafollicular plasma cell formation in responding spleens. These results demonstrate that anti‐CD11c monoclonal antibody can both target antigen and act as a powerful adjuvant for rapid and sustained antibody responses. They also point to an interesting role for CR4 on DC in triggering B cells during humoral immunity.