Currently, testing for immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization is the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation in suspected allergic conditions. This review provides a thorough and updated critical appraisal of the most frequently used diagnostic tests, both in vivo and in vitro. It discusses skin tests, challenges, and serological and cellular in vitro tests, and provides an overview of indications, advantages and disadvantages of each in conditions such as respiratory, food, venom, drug, and occupational allergy. Skin prick testing remains the first line approach in most instances; the added value of serum specific IgE to whole allergen extracts or components, as well as the role of basophil activation tests, is evaluated. Unproven, non-validated, diagnostic tests are also discussed. Throughout the review, the reader must bear in mind the relevance of differentiating between sensitization and allergy; the latter entails not only allergic sensitization, but also clinically relevant symptoms triggered by the culprit allergen.

Allergic rhinitis affects the quality of life of millions of people worldwide. Air pollution not only causes morbidity, but nearly 3 million people per year die from unhealthy indoor air exposure. Furthermore, allergic rhinitis and air pollution interact. This report summarizes the discussion of an International Expert Consensus on the management of allergic rhinitis aggravated by air pollution. The report begins with a review of indoor and outdoor air pollutants followed by epidemiologic evidence showing the impact of air pollution and climate change on the upper airway and allergic rhinitis. Mechanisms, particularly oxidative stress, potentially explaining the interactions between air pollution and allergic rhinitis are discussed. Treatment for the management of allergic rhinitis aggravated by air pollution primarily involves treating allergic rhinitis by guidelines and reducing exposure to pollutants. Fexofenadine a non-sedating oral antihistamine improves AR symptoms aggravated by air pollution. However, more efficacy studies on other pharmacological therapy of coexisting AR and air pollution are currently lacking.

Food allergy carries high importance and responsibility, affecting an estimated 220 million people worldwide. It is a frequent cause of food-induced anaphylaxis, a life-threatening condition requiring a toll of about one death per 50 million people a year worldwide. In order to help patients to identify allergenic foods and thus avoid anaphylactic reactions, 66 countries over the 5 continents require by law that allergenic ingredients must be declared when used in prepackaged foods. Unfortunately, the mandatory allergen list is not uniform, but varies among different countries. The widespread adoption of Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL) results in a proliferation of unregulated PALs with different informative statements. In this situation, the need of a scientific consensus on the definition of food allergy and the identification of a tolerable risk with routinely used detection assays, considering not only the eliciting dose but also the food source, is urgent. The aim of this manuscript is: 1) to draw a picture of the global situation in terms of PALs, and 2) to highlight new approaches that could aid in tackling the problem of regulating the labeling of allergens. These include the Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling (VITAL) system, which intersects reference doses and labelling decisions, and a direct quantification of trace amounts of allergens at lower limit of detection (LOD) levels in the food itself through proteomics. We here highlight how, although with some limitations, the steady advances in proteomic approaches possess higher sensitivity than the recommended VITAL reference doses, allowing the identification of allergens at much lower LOD levels than VITAL. Considering that each assay used to detect allergen in food products carries method-specific issues, a more comprehensive and harmonized approach implementing both quantitative and qualitative methods could help overcoming the risk stratification approach and the overuse of PALs, offering promise as the field moves forward towards improving consumers’ quality of life.

Background: Chronic cough can be triggered by respiratory and non-respiratory tract illnesses originating mainly from the upper and lower airways, and the GI tract (ie, reflux). Recent findings suggest it can also be a prominent feature in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), laryngeal hyperresponsiveness, and COVID-19. The classification of chronic cough is constantly updated but lacks clear definition. Epidemiological data on the prevalence of chronic cough are informative but highly variable. The underlying mechanism of chronic cough is a neurogenic inflammation of the cough reflex which becomes hypersensitive, thus the term hypersensitive cough reflex (HCR). A current challenge is to decipher how various infectious and inflammatory airway diseases and esophageal reflux, among others, modulate HCR. Objectives:The World Allergy Organization/Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (WAO/ ARIA) Joint Committee on Chronic Cough reviewed the current literature on classification, epidemiology, presenting features, and mechanistic pathways of chronic cough in airway-and reflux-related cough phenotypes, OSA, and COVID-19. The interplay of cough reflex sensitivity

Background Breast cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality worldwide. Its treatment is multidisciplinary with surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy. In Colombia, according to Globocan 2018, there is an age-standardized incidence rate of 44 per 100,000 women. Radiotherapy improves local and regional control in patients with breast cancer, and it could even improve relapse-free survival and overall survival in patients with nodal disease. The toxicity of this treatment in most cases is mild and transient, but in a low percentage of patients, radiotherapy-induced tumors may develop. Case presentation Seven Colombian patients treated for breast cancer at our institution developed radiotherapy-induced tumors between 2008 and 2018. The median age was 54.4 (range 35–72) years. Six patients had locally advanced tumors at the time breast cancer was diagnosed, and all of them received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The radiotherapy-induced tumors were five sarcomas, one of which was a well-differentiated angiosarcomatous vascular lesion with negative c-Myc (benign lesion), and the remaining patient had basal cell carcinoma associated with radiotherapy. Conclusions Sarcomas are the most common radiotherapy-induced tumors after breast cancer treatment. These are rare, aggressive tumors and represent between 0.5% and 5.5% of all sarcomas. Basal cell carcinoma has also been associated with breast cancer treatment. The management is individualized and multimodal, including surgical resection and chemotherapy. Different studies have shown that radiation therapy is a risk factor for the development of soft tissue tumors.