The purpose of the study was to compare postoperative vaginal irradiation with surgery alone in low-risk International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB endometrial carcinoma. The study was a prospective, randomized trial of 645 evaluable low-risk endometrial carcinoma patients from 6 European gynecologic cancer centers. All tumors were in FIGO stage IA-IB, of endometrioid histological type, and FIGO grade 1-2. High-dose-rate afterloading equipments (iridium [Ir] 192 or cobalt [co] 60) were used at 5 centers, and low-dose-rate (LDR) afterloading equipment (cesium [Cs] 137) at 1 center. Perspex vaginal applicators or ovoids were normally used, and the dose was specified at 5 mm from the surface of the applicator. Three to 6 fractions (3.0-8.0 Gy) were given, and the overall treatment time was 4 to 15 days. A total of 319 patients were treated with surgery plus vaginal irradiation (treatment group), and 326 patients with surgery alone (control group).Twenty-six recurrences (4.0%) were recorded in the complete series. The locoregional recurrence rate was 2.6%, whereas distant metastases occurred in 1.4%. The rate of vaginal recurrences was 1.2% in the treatment group versus 3.1% in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.114). Side effects were few and mild (grade 1-2). Dysuria, frequency, and incontinence were slightly more common after vaginal irradiation (2.8% vs 0.6%, respectively). Late intestinal problems were few and similar in the 2 groups. The conclusions were that the impact of postoperative brachytherapy on even the locoregional recurrence rate seems to be limited in patients with low-risk endometrial carcinoma. The overall recurrence rate and survival were similar in the 2 groups.
ABSTRACT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the coverage of axillary nodal volumes with high tangent fields (HTF) in breast radiotherapy and to determine the utility of customised blocking. The treatment plans of 30 consecutive patients with early breast cancer were evaluated. The prescription dose was 50 Gy to the whole breast. Axillary level I-II lymph node volumes were delineated and the cranial border of the tangential fields was set just below the humeral head to create HTF. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to calculate the doses received by axillary nodal volumes. In a second planning set, HTF were modified with multileaf collimators (MLC-HTF) to obtain an adequate dose coverage of axillary nodes. The mean doses of the axillary nodes, the ipsilateral lung and heart were compared between the two plans (HTF vs MLC-HTF) using a paired sample t-test. The doses received by 95% of the breast volumes were not significantly different for the two plans. The doses received by 95% of the level I and II axillary volumes were 16.79 Gy and 11.59 Gy, respectively, for HTF, increasing to 47.2 Gy and 45.03 Gy, respectively, for MLC-HTF. Mean lung doses and per cent volume of the ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy (V20) were also increased from 6.47 Gy and 10.47%, respectively, for HTF, to 9.56 Gy and 16.77%, respectively, for MLC-HTF. Our results suggest that HTF do not adequately cover the level I and II axillary lymph node regions. Modification of HTF with MLC is necessary to obtain an adequate coverage of axillary levels without compromising healthy tissue in the majority of the patients. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for clinically nodenegative breast cancer has become the standard approach for the surgical evaluation of the axilla [1,2]. If the final pathology report reveals metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node(s), then axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is considered. Irradiation of the axillary lymph nodes is also an option for regional treatment. Axillary radiation and surgery have provided equivalent local control in early breast cancer patients [3,4]. Randomised trials to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of surgical or radiotherapeutic management of axilla with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy have been planned, and the results are pending [5]. Irradiation of the axilla can be performed via separate anteriorposterior fields; alternatively a portion of the axilla (the most likely levels I and II) can be covered by the tangential fields; Irradiating the lower levels of the axilla through tangential fields is considered to be more practical. In the era of CT-based three dimensional (3D) radiotherapy planning, however, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of coverage of the axillary levels in the tangential fields [6][7][8][9][10].In this study, we evaluated the coverage of the axillary nodal levels administered using modified high tangential fields in patients without axillary dissection and the effect of this modification on the doses received by the ipsilateral lung. Methods ...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported morbidity of implanted fiducial markers used for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy. Three fiducial markers were implanted under transrectal ultrasound guidance to 177 patients who were referred to our department for definitive radiotherapy between June 2005 and January 2008. No local anaesthesia was administered. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about the possible side effects of this invasive procedure. 135 patients completed the questionnaire at a median of 57 weeks after the procedure. Pain during the procedure was assessed with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Patients were also asked to compare the pain with the diagnostic biopsy. Although haematuria, rectal bleeding and fever were reported by 15%, 4% and 2% of the 135 patients, respectively, no major toxicity necessitating any intervention was observed. The mean pain score reported by the patients was 1.7 (range, 0-5). 87% of patients reported less (or comparable) pain than the diagnostic biopsy. In conclusion, implantation of fiducial markers for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure.
The FiF technique, compared to CRT, for breast radiotherapy enables significantly better dose distribution in the PTV. Significant differences are also found for soft tissue volume, the ipsilateral lung dose, and the heart dose. Considering the decreased MUs needed for treatment, the FiF technique is preferred over tangential CRT.
The aim of the present study was to identify the optimal Ki-67 cut-off value in breast cancer (BC) patients, and investigate the association of Ki-67 expression levels with other prognostic factors. Firstly, a retrospective search was performed to identify patients with stage I–III BC (n=462). A range of Ki-67 index values were then assigned to five groups (<10, 10–14, 15–19, 20–24 and ≥25%). The correlation between the Ki-67 index and other prognostic factors [age, tumor type, histological and nuclear grade, tumor size, multifocality, an in situ component, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2) status, axillary involvement and tumor stage] were investigated in each group. The median Ki-67 value was revealed to be 20% (range, 1–95%). A young age (≤40 years old), tumor type, size and grade, LVI, ER/PR negativity and HER-2 positivity were revealed to be associated with the Ki-67 level. Furthermore, Ki-67 was demonstrated to be negatively correlated with ER/PR expression (P<0.001), but positively correlated with tumor size (P<0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that a Ki-67 value of ≥15% was associated with the largest number of poor prognostic factors (P=0.036). In addition, a Ki-67 value of ≥15% was identified to be statistically significant in association with certain luminal subtypes. The rate of disease-free survival was higher in patients with luminal A subtype BC (P=0.036). Following the correlation analysis for the Ki-67 index and the other prognostic factors, a Ki-67 value of ≥15% was revealed to be the optimal cut-off level for BC patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.