In this catalog we present the updated set of spectral analyses of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor during its first four years of operation. It contains two types of spectra, time-integrated spectral fits and spectral fits at the brightest time bin, from 943 triggered GRBs. Four different spectral models were fitted to the data, resulting in a compendium of more than 7500 spectra. The analysis was performed similarly but not identically to Goldstein et al. All 487 GRBs from the first two years have been re-fitted using the same methodology as that of the 456 GRBs in years three and four. We describe, in detail, our procedure and criteria for the analysis and present the results in the form of parameter distributions both for the observer-frame and rest-frame quantities. The data files containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center.

3It is now accepted that long duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced during the collapse of a massive star 1,2 . 11,12 . GRB 060505 was a faint burst with a duration of 4 s. GRB 060614 had a duration of 102 s and a pronounced hard to soft evolution. Both were rapidly localised by Swift's X-ray telescope (XRT). Subsequent follow-up of these bursts led to the discovery of their optical afterglows, locating them in galaxies at low redshift: GRB 060505 at z = 0.089 13 and GRB 060614 at z = 0.125 14,15 . The relative proximity of these bursts engendered an expectation that a bright SN would be discovered a few days after the bursts, as had been found just a few months before in 4 another low-redshift Swift burst, GRB 060218 (z = 0.033) 9 , and in all previous wellobserved nearby bursts 1,5-8 .We monitored the afterglows of GRB 060505 and 060614 using a range of telescopes (see supplementary material for details). These led to early detections of the afterglows. We continued the monitoring campaign and obtained stringent upper limits on any re-brightening at the position of the optical afterglows up to 12 and 5 weeks after the bursts, respectively. The light-curves obtained based on this monitoring are shown in Fig. 1. For GRB 060505 we detected the optical afterglow at a single epoch. All subsequent observations resulted in deep upper limits. For GRB 060614 we followed the decay of the optical afterglow in the R-band up to four nights after the burst. In later observations no source was detected to deep limits (see also 14,15 for independent studies of this event). As seen in Fig. 1, the upper limits are far below the level seen in previous SNe, in particular previous SNe associated with long-duration GRBs 5-9 . For both GRBs A concern in any attempt to uncover a SN associated with a GRB is the presence of a poorly quantified level of extinction along the line of sight. In these cases however,we are fortunate that the levels of Galactic extinction in both directions are very low,. In the case of GRB 060505, our spatially resolved spectroscopy of the host galaxy allows us to use the Balmer emission line ratios to limit the dust obscuration 5 at the location of the burst. The Balmer line ratio is consistent with no internal reddening. In the case of GRB 060614, the detection of the early afterglow in many bands, including the Swift UV bands UVW1 and UVW2 17 , rules out significant obscuration of the source in the host galaxy and we conclude that there is no significant dust obscuration in either case (see also 15 ).Both GRBs were located in star-forming galaxies. The host galaxy of GRB 060505 has an absolute magnitude of about M B = -19.6 and the spectrum displays the prominent emission lines typically seen in star-forming galaxies. The 2-dimensional spectrum shows that the host galaxy emission seen at the position of the afterglow is due to a compact H II region in a spiral arm of the host (see the supplementary material for details). We estimate a star-formation rate of 1 M  yr −1 and a specific rate of about 4T...

The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. In March 2013, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released the initial cosmology products based on the first 15.5 months of Planck data, along with a set of scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This paper gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis, and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect. The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust support for the standard six-parameter ΛCDM model of cosmology and improved measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25σ. Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations (σ 8 ) derived from CMB data and that derived from Sunyaev-Zeldovich data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first acoustic peak. Analysis of Planck polarization data is not yet mature, therefore polarization results are not released, although the robust detection of E-mode polarization around CMB hot and cold spots is shown graphically.

Observations of GRB 100724B with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor find that the spectrum is dominated by the typical Band functional form, which is usually taken to represent a non-thermal emission component, but also includes a statistically highly significant thermal spectral contribution. The simultaneous observation of the thermal and non-thermal components allows us to confidently identify the two emission components. The fact that these seem to vary independently favors the idea that the thermal component is of photospheric origin while the dominant non-thermal emission occurs at larger radii. Our results imply either a very high efficiency for the non-thermal process or a very small size of the region at the base of the flow, both quite challenging for the standard fireball model. These problems are resolved if the jet is initially highly magnetized and has a substantial Poynting flux.

The short GRB 120323A had the highest flux ever detected with the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor on board the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope. Here we study its remarkable spectral properties and their evolution using two spectral models: (1) a single emission component scenario, where the spectrum is modeled by the empirical Band function (a broken power law), and (2) a two-component scenario, where thermal (a Planck-like function) emission is observed simultaneously with a non-thermal component (a Band function). We find that the latter model fits the integrated burst spectrum significantly better than the former, and that their respective spectral parameters are dramatically different: when fit with a Band function only, the E peak of the event is unusually soft for a short gamma-ray burst (GRB; 70 keV compared to an average of 300 keV), while adding a thermal component leads to more typical short GRB values (E peak ∼ 300 keV). Our time-resolved spectral analysis produces similar results. We argue here that the two-component model is the preferred interpretation for GRB 120323A based on (1) the values and evolution of the Band function parameters of the two component scenario, which are more typical for a short GRB, and (2) the appearance in the data of a significant hardness-intensity correlation, commonly found in GRBs, when we employee two-component model fits; the correlation is non-existent in the Band-only fits. GRB 110721A, a long burst with an intense photospheric emission, exhibits the exact same behavior. We conclude that GRB 120323A has a strong photospheric emission contribution, observed for the first time in a short GRB. Magnetic dissipation models are difficult to reconcile with these results, which instead favor photospheric thermal emission and fast cooling synchrotron radiation from internal shocks. Finally, we derive a possibly universal hardness-luminosity relation in the source frame using a larger set of GRBs (L Band i = (1.59 ± 0.84) × 10 50 (E rest peak,i ) 1.33±0.07 erg s −1 ), which could be used as a possible redshift estimator for cosmology.