To date, no head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy of brigatinib and alectinib against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p), ALK-inhibitor-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) between brigatinib and alectinib, with crizotinib as a common comparator, using a Bayesian model with non-informative prior distribution and assessed the between-study heterogeneity of the studies. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and efficacy was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values. ITC analysis showed that there were no significant differences in PFS between the brigatinib and alectinib arms. However, the SUCRA values revealed that alectinib ranked the highest by efficacy in the overall patient population, whereas brigatinib ranked the highest by efficacy in the CNS metastasis sub-group. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of G3–5 adverse events between the brigatinib and alectinib arms in the overall patient population, the data were deemed insufficient for the CNS metastasis sub-group analysis. This study provides critical information to clinicians regarding the efficacy of brigatinib for ALK-p, ALK-inhibitor-naïve, advanced NSCLC patients, with and without CNS metastasis. Larger randomized, controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.
Aim: Frailty and sarcopenia affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it remains uncertain which model is the most suitable for evaluating vulnerability in patients with COPD. We evaluated the validity of three frailty modelsthe Kihon Checklist (KCL), the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Study of Osteoporotic Fracturesand one sarcopenia model for older patients with COPD.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 201 older (aged ≥65 years) outpatients with COPD. We used three frailty models and one sarcopenia model to identify their correlation with various indices that can evaluate the status of COPD and determine the most ideal model for evaluating vulnerability in patients with COPD.Results: The highest prevalence of frailty (38%) and lowest prevalence of robustness (26%) were observed using the KCL. Although all models reflected the characteristics of COPD, the KCL yielded the strongest correlations with clinically important physical, psychological and prognostic indices. The KCL yielded statistically significant differences in almost all indices among the three intergroup comparisons (robust, pre-frailty and frailty). The KCL was superior in extracting mood disorders to the other models.Conclusion: Although all investigated models were useful, the KCL was the most suitable for evaluating the frailty status and might enable interventions in patients with COPD.
Background The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined. Methods Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx. Results The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%). Conclusions The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure. Key points Significant study findings The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials. The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy. What this study adds It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice. To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.