Background and Aim Gastrointestinal manifestations of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic may mimic irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and social distancing measures may affect IBS patients negatively. We aimed to study the impact of COVID‐19 on respondents with self‐reported IBS. Methods We conducted an anonymized survey from May to June 2020 in 33 countries. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on personal hygiene and social distancing as well as psychological impact of COVID‐19 were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences in well‐being and compliance to social distancing measures between respondents with and without self‐reported IBS. Factors associated with improvement or worsening of IBS symptoms were evaluated. Results Out of 2704 respondents, 2024 (74.9%) did not have IBS, 305 (11.3%) had self‐reported IBS, and 374 (13.8%) did not know what IBS was. Self‐reported IBS respondents reported significantly worse emotional, social, and psychological well‐being compared with non‐IBS respondents and were less compliant to social distancing measures (28.2% vs 35.3%, P = 0.029); 61.6% reported no change, 26.6% reported improvement, and 11.8% reported worsening IBS symptoms. Higher proportion of respondents with no change in IBS symptoms were willing to practice social distancing indefinitely versus those who deteriorated (74.9% vs 51.4%, P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, willingness to continue social distancing for another 2–3 weeks ( vs longer period) was significantly associated with higher odds of worsening IBS. Conclusion Our study showed that self‐reported IBS respondents had worse well‐being and compliance to social distancing measures than non‐IBS respondents. Future research will focus on occupational stress and dietary changes during COVID‐19 that may influence IBS.

IntroductionRegardless of having effective vaccines against COVID-19, containment measures such as enhanced physical distancing and good practice of personal hygiene remain the mainstay of controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Countries across Asia have imposed these containment measures to varying extents. However, residents in different countries would have a differing degree of compliance to these containment measures potentially due to differences in the level of awareness and motivation in the early phase of pandemic.ObjectivesIn our study, we aimed to describe and correlate the level of knowledge and attitude with the level of compliance with personal hygiene and physical distancing practices among Asian countries in the early phase of pandemic.MethodsA multinational cross-sectional study was carried out using electronic surveys between May and June 2020 across 14 geographical areas. Subjects aged 21 years and above were invited to participate through social media, word of mouth and electronic mail.ResultsAmong the 2574 responses obtained, 762 (29.6%) participants were from East Asia and 1812 (70.4%) were from Southeast Asia (SEA). A greater proportion of participants from SEA will practise physical distancing as long as it takes (72.8% vs 60.6%). Having safe distancing practices such as standing more than 1 or 2 m apart (AdjOR 5.09 95% CI (1.08 to 24.01)) or more than 3 or 4 m apart (AdjOR 7.05 95% CI (1.32 to 37.67)), wearing a mask when they had influenza-like symptoms before the COVID-19 pandemic, preferring online news channels such as online news websites/applications (AdjOR 1.73 95% CI (1.21 to 2.49)) and social media (AdjOR 1.68 95% CI (1.13 to 2.50) as sources of obtaining information about COVID-19 and high psychological well-being (AdjOR 1.39 95% CI (1.04 to 1.87)) were independent factors associated with high compliance.ConclusionsWe found factors associated with high compliance behaviour against COVID-19 in the early phase of pandemic and it will be useful to consider them in risk assessment, communication and pandemic preparedness.

Importance Knowledge and attitude influence compliance and individuals’ practices. The risk and protective factors associated with high compliance to these preventive measures are critical to enhancing pandemic preparedness. Objective This survey aims to assess differences in mental health, knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of preventive measures for COVID-19 amongst healthcare professionals (HCP) and non-healthcare professionals. Design Multi-national cross-sectional study was carried out using electronic surveys between May-June 2020. Setting Multi-national survey was distributed across 36 countries through social media, word-of-mouth, and electronic mail. Participants Participants ≥21 years working in healthcare and non-healthcare related professions. Main outcome Risk factors determining the difference in KAP towards personal hygiene and social distancing measures during COVID-19 amongst HCP and non-HCP. Results HCP were significantly more knowledgeable on personal hygiene (AdjOR 1.45, 95% CI -1.14 to 1.83) and social distancing (AdjOR 1.31, 95% CI -1.06 to 1.61) compared to non-HCP. They were more likely to have a positive attitude towards personal hygiene and 1.5 times more willing to participate in the contact tracing app. There was high compliance towards personal hygiene and social distancing measures amongst HCP. HCP with high compliance were 1.8 times more likely to flourish and more likely to have a high sense of emotional (AdjOR 1.94, 95% CI (1.44 to 2.61), social (AdjOR 2.07, 95% CI -1.55 to 2.78), and psychological (AdjOR 2.13, 95% CI (1.59–2.85) well-being. Conclusion and relevance While healthcare professionals were more knowledgeable, had more positive attitudes, their higher sense of total well-being was seen to be more critical to enhance compliance. Therefore, focusing on the well-being of the general population would help to enhance their compliance towards the preventive measures for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The Philippines ranks 10th in tuberculosis prevalence worldwide. Aside from pulmonary tuberculosis, GI tuberculosis remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in endemic areas. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the clinicopathologic profile and surgical outcomes of patients with GI tuberculosis. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. SETTING: Department of Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines. PATIENTS: This study included all newly diagnosed cases of GI tuberculosis from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical response to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 241 confirmed new cases were managed during an 11-year period. Of these, 208 patients (86.30%) underwent outright surgery, whereas the remaining patients (13.69%) received antituberculous therapy. Fifteen medically managed patients eventually required surgery, bringing the total surgically managed patients to 223. The patients’ age ranged from 19 to 72 years, with a 1.9:1 male to female ratio. The most common complaint was abdominal pain. Intestinal obstruction was the most common indication for surgery. A right hemicolectomy was the most often performed procedure, with the ileocecal area as the most frequently involved segment. The most common histopathologic findings were epithelioid granuloma and caseation necrosis. Postoperative length of stay ranged from 0 to 59 days (mean, 7 days). Morbidity rate was 5.38% and mortality rate was 3.14%. Four deaths were operative and resulted from septic shock because of hollow viscus perforation. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to histopathologic basis for diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The recommended initial therapy for all forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is a 6-month regimen of antituberculous therapy unless the organisms are known or suspected to be resistant to first-line drugs. Surgery is reserved for complications of intra-abdominal tuberculosis: obstruction, perforation, or severe bleeding. Timely surgical intervention, coupled with medical management led to the best outcomes for these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C56. MANEJO QUIRÚRGICO DE PACIENTES CON TUBERCULOSIS GASTROINTESTINAL ANTECEDENTES: Las Filipinas ocupa el décimo lugar en prevalencia de tuberculosis en todo el mundo. Aparte de la tuberculosis pulmonar, la tuberculosis gastrointestinal sigue siendo una causa importante de morbilidad y mortalidad, especialmente en las zonas endémicas. OBJETIVO: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir el perfil clinicopatológico y los resultados quirúrgicos de pacientes con tuberculosis gastrointestinal. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. AJUSTE: Departamento de Cirugía del Hospital General de Filipinas, Manila, Filipinas. PACIENTES: Todos los casos de tuberculosis gastrointestinal recién diagnosticados desde el 1 de Enero del 2009 hasta el 31 de Diciembre del 2019. MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL: Respuesta clínica a la cirugía. RESULTADOS: Se manejaron un total de 24...