ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E were evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative Thai adults. Of 133 volunteers enrolled, 122 completed the trial. There were no serious vaccine-related adverse events, nor were there intercurrent HIV infections. Lymphoproliferative responses to glycoprotein 120 E were induced in 63% of the volunteers, and HIV-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses were induced in 24%. Antibody responses increased in frequency and magnitude in association with the dose level of AIDSVAX B/E. Binding and neutralizing antibodies to the MN strain were induced in 100% and 98%, respectively, of the volunteers receiving 600 microg of AIDSVAX B/E, and such antibodies to E strains were induced in 96% and 71%, respectively, of these volunteers. This vaccine combination was well tolerated and was immunogenic, meeting milestones for advancement to phase 3 evaluation.
Safety and immunogenicity of 2 recombinant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope glycoprotein (gp) 120 vaccines derived from SF2 (subtype B) and CM235 (CRF01_AE, Thai E) were evaluated in 370 Thai adults at low risk of HIV infection. Various doses of CM235 (25, 50, or 100 microg) and SF2 (0, 25, or 50 microg) gp120 were used. Eighty volunteers received placebo. There were no serious adverse events related to vaccination. Binding antibody developed in all vaccine recipients. There was no dose response to CM235 gp120, but a dose response to gp120 SF2 was present. Neutralizing antibodies to subtype E HIV-1 NPO3 and subtype B HIV-1 SF2 developed in 84% and 82% of vaccine recipients, respectively. Lymphoproliferative responses were detected in >95% of vaccine recipients. There was no evidence of antigenic interference in HIV-specific humoral or cellular responses. The gp120 Thai E and SF2 vaccines were safe and immunogenic in combination and could be advanced into phase 3 testing.
Because mucosal immune responses may be important in protection against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), HIV-1-specific immune responses at mucosal sites in natural infection were compared. Total antibody concentrations and HIV-1-specific binding antibody responses in four distinct mucosal sites and serum were assessed in 41 HIV-infected and 19 HIV-seronegative women. HIV-1 gp160-specific IgG responses were detected in >99% of mucosal samples in infected subjects, with the highest titers in genital secretions. HIV-1-specific IgA was detected in the majority of endocervical secretions (94%) and nasal washes (95%) but less often in vaginal washes (51%) and parotid saliva (38%). There was no significant correlation between mucosal immune response and most clinical factors. Based on methodologic considerations, frequencies of detection, and HIV-1-specific responses, nasal washes and genital secretions may each provide important measures of HIV-1-specific mucosal immune responses in infected women.
A phase II efficacy trial was conducted with recombinant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope glycoprotein gp160 (rgp160) in 608 HIV-infected, asymptomatic volunteers with CD4+ cell counts >400 cells/mm3. During a 5-year study, volunteers received a 6-shot primary series of immunizations with either rgp160 or placebo over 6 months, followed by booster immunizations every 2 months. Repeated vaccination with rgp160 was safe and persistently immunogenic. Adequate follow-up and acquisition of endpoints allowed for definitive interpretation of the trial results. There was no evidence that rgp160 has efficacy as a therapeutic vaccine in early-stage HIV infection, as measured at primary endpoints (50% decline in CD4+ cell count or disease progression to Walter Reed stage 4, 5, or 6) or secondary endpoints. A transient improvement was seen in the secondary CD4 endpoint for the vaccination compared with the placebo arm, but this did not translate into improved clinical outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.