The absence of a heat flow anomaly greater than ∼0.3 µcal/cm2/sec associated with the San Andreas fault is used to estimate the upper limit for the steady state or initial shear stress. Under the assumption that the long‐term rate of motion along the fault is 5 cm/yr and occurs primarily in the form of creep, this upper limit is about 100 bars. If the motion is primarily accomplished by faulting during large earthquakes and if the frictional stress is equal to the final stress as suggested by E. Orowan (1960), the upper limit is estimated to be about 200 bars. Without Orowan's assumption, the estimation of the upper limit is about 250 bars, based on earthquake energy‐magnitude‐moment relations. If the long‐term rate of motion along the San Andreas fault is only ∼2 cm/yr, these results are increased to 250, 350, and 400 bars, respectively.
New measurements of heat flow are reported for one hundred thirty‐eight sites in the United States. The tabulation includes mean gradients, mean resistivities, and uncorrected and topographically corrected heat flow. Methods and calibrations are briefly described. In several areas, station density is adequte for preliminary contouring and for correlation with basement geology and radioactivity.
We report 66 new heat flow and 24 new heat production measurements from the Sirt Basin, a late Jurassic‐Miocene sedimentary depression in north central Libya underlain by late Proterozoic basement. Heat flow determinations were made using bottom hole temperatures from oil wells and thermal conductivity measurements from drill core and cuttings; heat production measurements come from core samples of basement rock. Heat flow is fairly uniform throughout the basin, with a mean of 72 ± 9 (s. d.) mW m−2. It is not clear if heat flow from the Sirt Basin is elevated as a consequence of its origin as a late Mesozoic rift. The difference between the mean basin heat flow and the global mean heat flow from tectonically undisturbed late Proterozoic terrains (55 ± 17 mW m−2) is 17 mW m−2, but this difference lies within the uncertainties associated with these mean heat flow estimates. If heat flow from the Sirt Basin is elevated, it could be caused by enhanced crustal heat production and need not be attributed to thermal alteration of the lithosphere related to basin formation. Mean crustal heat production is 3.9 ± 2.1 μW m−3, 1/2 to 3 times greater than surface heat production in other Proterozoic terrains in Africa. From west to east, the pattern of heat flow across northern Africa is characterized by high (80–110 mW m−2) heat flow throughout most of northwestern Africa, normal to perhaps slightly elevated heat flow in the Sirt Basin, low to normal (35–55 mW m−2) heat flow in Egypt inboard of the Red Sea, and high heat (75–100 mW m−2) flow along the Red Sea. High heat flow near the Red Sea and in northwestern Africa along the Mediterranean coast can be readily attributed to Cenozoic tectonic activity, but high heat flow in the Paleozoic Sahara basins of southern Algeria is harder to understand within the tectonic framework of northern Africa. A possible explanation, advanced previously, is that elevated heat flow in the Sahara basins arises from a regional thermal anomaly within the north African lithosphere. If that explanation is correct, then the heat flow distribution in the Sirt Basin and in Egypt away from the Red Sea suggests that the postulated lithospheric thermal anomaly does not extend beyond the Sahara basins to the east.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.