BackgroundSeveral studies have reported a significant association between sleep disturbance and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical characteristics and the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) of Japanese IBD patients with or without sleep disturbances, and to investigate the risk factors for disease flare in these patients.MethodsIBD patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire including the Pittsburg sleep quality index and the 8-item short-form health survey. The information about disease flare within 1 year from enrollment in the study was analyzed with a multiple logistic regression model to identify risk factors for IBD flare-ups.ResultsThe prevalence of sleep disturbances was 44.1 % (60 out of 136 IBD patients). Use of sleep medications was significantly higher in IBD patients with sleep disturbances whereas use of immuno modulators was significantly higher in IBD patients without sleep disturbances. The scores from all HR-QOL domains were significantly lower in patients with sleep disturbances than in patients without sleep disturbances. Fifty-one patients (37.5 %) had disease flare within 1 year from enrollment in the study and sleep disturbances were identified as a significant risk factor for disease flare (OR 3.09, 95 % CI 1.47–6.43).ConclusionsOur results indicate that sleep disturbances are common in Japanese IBD patients and are associated with poorer HR-QOL. Since the presence of sleep disturbances is a significant risk factor for IBD flare-ups, we encourage physicians to perform a careful examination of sleep disturbances in IBD patients.

Background and study aims Endoscopic findings of esophageal eosinophilia sometimes localize to small areas of the esophagus. A previous study suggested that pathogenesis of localized-type eosinophilic esophagitis (LEoE) was associated with acid reflux. However, LEoE treatment outcomes have not been studied. We aimed to analyze the clinical and histologic significance of LEoE in comparison with diffuse-type eosinophilic esophagitis (DEoE). Patients and methods This study included 106 patients with esophageal eosinophilia. Esophageal eosinophilia was defined as a condition where the maximum number of intraepithelial eosinophils was ≥ 15 per high-power field. LEoE was defined as an endoscopic lesion confined to one-third of the esophagus: upper, middle, or lower. Esophageal eosinophilia encompassing more than two-thirds of the esophagus was defined as DEoE. We retrospectively compared LEoE and DEoE in terms of clinical characteristics, histologic findings, and proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responders. Results Of 106 patients, 12 were classified as having LEoE and 94 were classified as having DEoE. The proportion of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the LEoE group than the DEoE group (42 % vs 7 %, P < 0.01). In the LEoE group, 10 patients (84 %) had endoscopic lesions in the lower esophagus. The maximum number of eosinophils did not differ between the groups (54 [24 – 71] for LEoE, 40 [20 – 75] for DEoE, P = 0.65). The prevalence of PPI responders was significantly higher in the LEoE group than the DEoE group (100 % vs 63 %, P = 0.01). Conclusion LEoE can be a sign of good responsiveness to PPI therapy.

Objective: Recent guidelines propose that both proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responders and nonresponders are included in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Although multiple biopsies should be required to diagnose EoE because of patchy distribution of esophageal eosinophils, it is unclear whether multiple biopsies are required to evaluate histological effectiveness of PPI therapy. This study aimed to determine the optimal biopsy protocol after PPI therapy in patients with EoE. Methods: Of 110 EoE patients, 22 PPI nonresponders were enrolled. Intraepithelial eosinophils were counted in areas of high density in multiple biopsy specimens after PPI therapy. The prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia and peak eosinophil counts after PPI therapy was analyzed according to the biopsy sites and endoscopic findings. Positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated according to the number of biopsies. Results: Of 124 biopsies, 59 (47.6%) specimens showed esophageal eosinophilia (≥15 per high-power field). Eosinophil counts were significantly higher in specimens from the lower esophagus than in those from the upper esophagus but not in those from the middle esophagus. Prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia was 76.2, 40.9, and 24.3% in the lower, middle, and upper esophagus respectively. PPI nonresponders were diagnosed in all cases with 4 biopsy specimens obtained from the lower and middle esophagus, showing that PPV for non-effectiveness of PPI therapy was 0.910 (95% CI 0.773–1.000). The prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia and peak eosinophil counts was higher in cases with white plaques and linear furrows. Conclusion: Multiple biopsies should be required to evaluate histological effectiveness of PPI therapy in patients with EoE. Four biopsies from the lower and middle esophagus may be sufficient.

The Noda epileptic rat (NER) exhibits generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). A genetic linkage analysis identified two GTCS-associated loci, Ner1 on Chr 1 and Ner3 on Chr 5. The wild-type Ner1 and Ner3 alleles suppressed GTCS when combined in double-locus congenic lines, but not when present in single-locus congenic lines. Global expression analysis revealed that cholecystokinin B receptor (Cckbr) and suppressor of tumorigenicity 5 (St5), which map within Ner1, and PHD finger protein 24 (Phf24), which maps within Ner3, were significantly downregulated in NER. De novo BAC sequencing detected an insertion of an endogenous retrovirus sequence in intron 2 of the Phf24 gene in the NER genome, and PHF24 protein was almost absent in the NER brain. Phf24 encodes a G-interacting protein involved in GABA receptor signaling pathway. Based on these findings, we conclude that Cckbr, St5, and Phf24 are strong candidate genes for GTCS in NER.

Approximately 40% of all patients with ovarian cancer in Japan are aged ≥65 years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the differences in prognosis and prognostic factors between elderly and younger patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. A total of 114 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-IV ovarian cancer who were initiated on primary treatment at the Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) were included in this study. Patient characteristics, treatment outcome and prognosis were compared between elderly (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients, and the prognostic factors associated with overall survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The most common histological type in younger patients was clear cell carcinoma (33.8%) vs. serous carcinoma in elderly patients (44.1%), with a significant difference in the distribution of histological type (P=0.006). Complete resection was achieved in 56.2% of younger patients compared with 32.4% of elderly patients (P=0.03). The rates of standard primary treatment were comparable (56.7% of younger vs. 50.0% of elderly patients). Overall and disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multivariate analyses identified FIGO stage and standard primary therapy as prognostic factors in younger patients and performance status in elderly patients. Age was not an independent significant prognostic factor among patients with ovarian cancer. Therefore, performance status, rather than age, should be considered when selecting the optimal treatment for elderly patients based on objective assessment.