Although rhinovirus (RV) infections can cause asthma exacerbations and alter lower airway inflammation and physiology, it is unclear how important bronchial infection is to these processes. To study the kinetics, location, and frequency of RV appearance in lower airway tissues during an acute infection, immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were used to analyze the presence of virus in cells from nasal lavage, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushings, and biopsy specimens from 19 subjects with an experimental RV serotype 16 (RV16) cold. RV was detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis on cells from nasal lavage and induced sputum samples from all subjects after RV16 inoculation, as well as in 5 of 19 bronchoalveolar lavage cell samples and in 5 of 18 bronchial biopsy specimens taken 4 days after virus inoculation. Immunohistochemistry detected RV16 in 39 and 36% of all biopsy and brushing samples taken 4 and 15 days, respectively, after inoculation. Infected cells were primarily distributed in discrete patches on the epithelium. These results confirm that infection of lower airway tissues is a frequent finding during a cold and further demonstrate a patchy distribution of infected cells, a pattern similar to that reported in upper airway tissues.

Neutrophils are sequestered in the newly transplanted lung after reperfusion or with infection, rejection, and chronic graft dysfunction. Because unopposed (free) neutrophil elastase (NE) released into bronchoalveolar secretions may injure the lung allograft and impair bacterial clearance, we assessed total neutrophil numbers, myeloperoxidase activity as an index of neutrophil influx and degranulation, alpha1-antiprotease (alpha1-AP) concentrations, and unopposed NE activity in bronchoalveolar secretions from lung transplant recipients. Unopposed NE activity was present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from recipients transplanted for emphysema associated with alpha1-AP deficiency as well as recipients without such deficiency (171 of 2,137 BALF; 8%). Ten of 17 (59%) recipients with alpha1-AP deficiency who were followed for at least 1 yr after transplant with multiple surveillance and diagnostic bronchoscopies had at least one BALF containing unopposed NE, usually associated with the presence of > or = 10(5) colony forming units/ml BALF of aerobic bacteria. In contrast, 19 of 58 (33%) with emphysema not associated with alpha1-AP deficiency, 8 of 32 (25%) recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF), 6 of 16 (38%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and 11 of 36 (31%) with other indications for transplant had unopposed NE in BALF. alpha1-AP levels were significantly elevated in the early posttransplant time period and could be augmented considerably in alpha1-AP-deficient recipients with episodes of infection or rejection. Our findings indicate that unopposed NE activity can be found in both alpha1-AP-deficient and alpha1-AP-sufficient recipients after transplantation, usually in association with endobronchial bacterial infection.

This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes for single (SLT) vs. bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). One hundred and eleven patients with ILD who underwent lung transplantation between January 1993 and March 2009 were evaluated. Recipients with BLT were younger (43 ± 12 vs. 57 ± 7 years), and significantly more patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) received BLT (50%) vs. patients with IPF (18%). BLT recipients had a significantly longer mean waitlist time (240 vs. 125 days), significantly higher systolic (51 ± 18 vs. 40 ± 11 mmHg) pulmonary artery pressures, were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass more frequently (67 vs. 31%), had a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (63 vs. 17%), more frequently were given prolonged peri-operative inhaled nitric oxide and more frequently required prolonged post-operative mechanical ventilatory support (6.0 vs. 1.7 days). Additionally, BLT recipients had a significantly longer intensive care unit (8 vs. 4 days) and hospital (24 vs. 15 days) length of stay. We did not detect a difference in survival (Kaplan-Meier) for SLT vs. BLT. Our findings suggest that outcomes for SLT for patients with ILD are comparable or somewhat superior to those for BLT, and short- and long-term survival are not significantly different for the two procedures.

In contrast to non-CF recipients, patients with CF displayed a significant incidence of colon cancer (4 of 70 recipients; 5.7%) with onset ranging from 246 days to 9.3 years post-transplant, which may be due to a combination of their underlying genetic disorder plus intense, sustained immunosuppression following lung transplantation. Colonoscopic screening may identify patients with pre-malignant colonic lesions and prevent progression to colonic malignancy.