Purpose
To determine dosimetric parameters associated with Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients in the IMRT era.
Material and Methods
Subsequent to institutional review board approval, we identified ORN in OPC patients treated with IMRT from 2002–2013. 1:2 case-control matching was implemented. Mandibular dose-volume histograms (DVH) were extracted. Dosimetric parameters were compared using non-parametric stats. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was done to identify DVH correlates of ORN.
Results
68 ORN cases and 131 controls were matched. Median follow-up was 41 months and median time to development of ORN was 16 months. Mandibular mean dose was significantly higher in the ORN cohort (48.1 vs 43.6 Gy, p < 0.0001). However, the maximum dose was not statistically different. DVH bins from V35 to V73 were all significantly higher in the ORN cohort compared with controls (p< 0.0006). Two DVH parameters were identified in RPA analysis, V43 and V58. The majority (81%) of ORN cases were observed with both V44≥42% and V58≥25%.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrate that a wide range of DVH parameters in the intermediate and high beam path were all significantly higher in ORN patients. Mandibular V44<42% and V58<25% represent reasonable DVH constraints for IMRT plan acceptability, when tumor coverage is not compromised.
Purpose:
The purpose of this case series is to show the varied oral presentations of multiple myeloma, illustrating the importance of carefully surveying the oral cavity for suspicious lesions that could be indicative of palpable disease and/or recurrence. The diagnostic criteria and prognostic features for multiple myeloma were also reviewed.
Case Series Summary:
This report focuses on 5 patients with myeloma manifestations involving the oral cavity, in which the oral presentation of multiple myeloma was an early indication of disease relapse. Although the clinical presentation may be variable, the majority of patients will develop lytic bone lesions and less commonly, extramedullary involvement during the course of their disease.
Discussion:
The presentation of myeloma can be varied and the oral presentation, although rare, may be the sole manifestation, or part of a group of signs of disease progression. Clinical presentations of patients with myelomatous lesions can mimic common dental pathologies, which then, in turn, can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment.
Conclusion:
As members of an interdisciplinary oncology team, it is essential to be familiar with oral manifestations of multiple myeloma and proper diagnostic/biopsy techniques in order to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment delays.
Background: COVID-19 pandemic has strained human and material resources around the world. Practices in surgical oncology had to change in response to these resource limitations, triaging based on acuity, expected oncologic outcomes, availability of supportive resources, and safety of health care personnel.Methods: The MD Anderson Head and Neck Surgery Treatment Guidelines Consortium devised the following to provide guidance on triaging head and neck cancer (HNC) surgeries based on multidisciplinary consensus. HNC subsites considered included aerodigestive tract mucosa, sinonasal, salivary, endocrine, cutaneous, and ocular.Recommendations: Each subsite is presented separately with diseasespecific recommendations. Options for alternative treatment modalities are provided if surgical treatment needs to be deferred. Conclusion: These guidelines are intended to help clinicians caring for patients with HNC appropriately allocate resources during a health care crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to advocate for individual consideration of cases in a multidisciplinary fashion based on individual patient circumstances and resource availability. K E Y W O R D S oncology, otolaryngology, SARS-CoV-2
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.