Cerebral autoregulation and baroreflex sensitivity are key mechanisms that maintain cerebral blood flow. This study assessed whether these control mechanisms are affected in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease, as this would increase the risks of antihypertensive treatment. We studied 53 patients with dementia (73.1 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 71.4-74.8]), 37 patients with mild cognitive impairment (69.2 years [95% CI, 66.4-72.0]), and 47 controls (69.4 years [95% CI, 68.3-70.5]). Beat-to-beat blood pressure (photoplethysmography), heart rate, and cerebral blood flow velocity (transcranial Doppler) were measured during 5-minute rest (sitting) and 5 minutes of orthostatic challenges, using repeated sit-to-stand maneuvers. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transfer function analysis and the autoregulatory index. Baroreflex sensitivity was estimated with transfer function analysis and by calculating the heart rate response to blood pressure changes during the orthostatic challenges. Dementia patients had the lowest cerebral blood flow velocity (=0.004). During rest, neither transfer function analysis nor the autoregulatory index indicated impairments in cerebral autoregulation. During the orthostatic challenges, higher autoregulatory index (=0.011) and lower transfer function gain (=0.017), indicating better cerebral autoregulation, were found in dementia (4.56 arb. unit [95% CI, 4.14-4.97]; 0.59 cm/s per mm Hg [95% CI, 0.51-0.66]) and mild cognitive impairment (4.59 arb. unit [95% CI, 4.04-5.13]; 0.51 cm/s per mm Hg [95% CI, 0.44-0.59]) compared with controls (3.71 arb. unit [95% CI, 3.35-4.07]; 0.67 cm/s per mm Hg [95% CI, 0.59-0.74]). Baroreflex sensitivity measures did not differ between groups. In conclusion, the key mechanisms to control blood pressure and cerebral blood flow are not reduced in 2 stages of Alzheimer disease compared with controls, both in rest and during orthostatic changes that reflect daily life challenges.

Background Research links blood pressure variability ( BPV ) with stroke; however, the association with cerebral small‐vessel disease ( CSVD ) remains unclear. As BPV and mean blood pressure are interrelated, it remains uncertain whether BPV adds additional information to understanding cerebrovascular morphological characteristics. Methods and Results A systematic review was performed from inception until March 3, 2019. Eligibility criteria included population, adults without stroke (<4 weeks); exposure, BPV quantified by any metric over any duration; comparison, (1) low versus high or mean BPV and (2) people with versus without CSVD ; and outcomes, (1) CSVD as subcortical infarct, lacunae, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, or enlarged perivascular spaces; and (2) standardized mean difference in BPV . A total of 27 articles were meta‐analyzed, comprising 12 309 unique brain scans. A total of 31 odds ratios ( OR s) were pooled, indicating that higher systolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD ( OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14–1.42; I 2 =85%) independent of mean systolic pressure. Likewise, higher diastolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD ( OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14–1.48; I 2 =53%) independent of mean diastolic pressure. There was no evidence of a pairwise interaction between systolic/diastolic and BPV /mean OR s ( P =0.47), nor a difference between BPV versus mean pressure OR s ( P =0.58). Fifty‐four standardized mean differences were pooled and provided similar results for pairwise interaction ( P =0.38) and difference between standardized mean differences ( P =0.70). Conclusions On the basis of the available studies, BPV was associated with CSVD independent of mean blood pressure. However, more high‐quality longitudinal data are required to elucidate whether BPV contributes unique variance to CSVD morphological characteristics.

Research links high blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke and cerebrovascular disease, however, its association with cognition remains unclear. Moreover, it remains uncertain which BP-derived parameter (ie, variability or mean) holds more significance in understanding vascular contributions to cognitive impairment. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus and performed a meta-analysis of studies that quantified the association between resting BPV with dementia or cognitive impairment in adults. Two authors independently reviewed all titles, abstracts, and full-texts and extracted data, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the (modified) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A multilevel meta-analysis was used, which included effect sizes for both BPV and mean BP, with a combined end point of dementia or cognitive impairment as primary outcome. In the primary analysis, 54 effect sizes were extracted from 20 studies, with a total analytical sample of n=7 899 697. Higher systolic BPV (odds ratio [OR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.16–1.35]), mean systolic pressure (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]), diastolic BPV (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12–1.29]), and mean diastolic pressure (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04–1.29]) were associated with dementia and cognitive impairment. A direct comparison showed that mean BP effect sizes were less strong than BPV effect sizes (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87–0.97], P <0.01), indicating that the relative contribution of BPV exceeded that of mean BP. Methodological and statistical heterogeneity was high. Secondary analyses were less consistent as to whether BPV and mean BP were differentially associated with dementia subtypes and cognitive domains. Future studies are required to investigate BPV as a target for dementia prevention.

Cerebrovascular changes, including reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF), occur early in the development of Alzheimer disease and may accelerate disease progression. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated how 6 months of treatment with the calcium antagonist nilvadipine would affect CBF in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease. CBF was measured with magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling in whole-brain gray matter and in a priori defined regions of interest including the hippocampus. Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned (29 in each group), of whom 22 in both groups had no magnetic resonance exclusion criteria and were medication compliant over 6 months. Mean age was 72.8±6.2 years, mean mini-mental state examination was 20.4±3.4. Nilvadipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure (Δ=−11.5 [95% CI, −19.7 to −3.2] mm Hg; P <0.01), while whole-brain gray-matter CBF remained stable (Δ=5.4 [95% CI, −6.4 to 17.2] mL/100 g per minute; P =0.36). CBF in the hippocampus increased (left: Δ=24.4 [95% CI, 4.3–44.5] mL/100 g per minute; P =0.02; right: Δ=20.1 [95% CI, −0.6 to 40.8] mL/100 g per minute; P =0.06). There was no significant change in CBF in the posterior cingulate cortex (Δ=5.2 [95% CI, −16.5 to 27.0] mL/100 g per minute; P =0.63) or other regions of interest. In conclusion, nilvadipine reduced blood pressure and increased CBF in the hippocampus, whereas other regions showed stable or small nonsignificant increases in CBF. These findings not only indicate preserved cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer disease but also point toward beneficial cerebrovascular effects of antihypertensive treatment. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02017340.