Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.

Cellular thiols have long been known to play a role in cell activation and proliferation; however, the differential expression of surface thiols on the lymphoid subsets had not been described. Neither was it known whether alteration of surface thiols occurs after exposure to mitogens or infectious agents. Herein, an impermeant thiol-specific fluorescent probe was employed for flow cytometric analysis of surface thiols. Quantification of surface thiols on resting lymphocytes revealed that some subsets expressed different concentrations of surface thiols (CD19+ > CD8+ > CD4+). Furthermore, surface thiols increased on all subsets by 8 h after mitogenic activation. This increase was blocked by cycloheximide or monensin but not by actinomycin D or inhibition of glutathione synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine. In addition, bacitracin, an inhibitor of protein disulfide isomerase, inhibited the increase in surface thiols and DNA synthesis. Lymphocytes from HIV-infected individuals displayed increased surface thiols on CD19+ and CD4+ cells but not CD8+ cells. Although cellular thiols in general have been believed to play a role in protection against oxidants, signaling associated with cell growth, and apoptosis, there is now evidence that changes in exofacial thiols appear to be involved in some of these critical cell reactivities. Thus, quantitative and possibly qualitative differences in surface thiols correlate with membrane differences between lymphoid subsets and with their differential sensitivities to oxidative stress, which suggests that the mechanisms by which surface thiols are maintained and modified after activation are important cellular functions that need to be further evaluated.