✓ The authors describe two rare occurrences of radiographically, surgically, and pathologically confirmed spinal intradural arachnoid cysts (not associated with additional pathological entities) that were located anterior to the cervical spinal cord. These lesions have been reported previously in only eight patients. The patients described in this report were young adults who presented with progressive spastic tetraparesis shortly after sustaining mild cervical trauma and in whom no neurological deficit or bone fracture was demonstrated. The presence of an intradural arachnoid cyst was detected on postcontrast computerized tomography (CT) myelography and on magnetic resonance imaging; both diagnostic tools correctly characterized the cystic nature of the lesion. Plain radiography, plain tomography, and contrast-enhanced CT scans were not diagnostic. In both cases a laminectomy was performed, and the wall of the cyst was excised and fenestrated with subarachnoid space. Postoperatively, the patients made complete neurological recoveries. Based on a review of the literature, arachnoid cysts of the spinal canal may be classified as either extra- or intradural. Intradural arachnoid cysts usually arise posterior to the spinal cord in the thoracic spine region; however, these cysts very rarely develop in the cervical region. The pathogenesis of arachnoid cysts is unclear, although congenital, traumatic and inflammatory causes have been postulated. The authors believe that the formation of an arachnoid cyst cannot be explained by simply one mechanism because, in some reported cases, there has been accidental or iatrogenic trauma in association with congenital lesions. They also note that an intradural arachnoid cyst located anterior to the cervical spinal cord is an extremely rare disorder that may cause progressive myelopathy; however, the postoperative prognosis is good.

Sixty three patients who had a lumbar subarachnoid catheter placed for closed continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage and the complications are presented. The drain was successful in achieving the desired goal in 59 patients (93,6%). The complications are mainly divided into 3 groups; A - complications related to alterations in CSF drainage rate, B - complications due to mechanical failure of the catheter, C - infection. The overall complication rate is found to be 44,4%. Overdrainage, pneumocephalus and meningitis are found to be the most severe complications, but most of these complications are reversible with early recognition. Unfortunately one patient died following meningitis and hepatic failure. Lumbar subarachnoid drainage is a safe method unless the development of any neurological findings should prompt rapid discontinuation of lumbar drainage and immediate radiographic evaluation.

Decompressive surgery or craniectomy (DC) is a treatment option, which should be considered when the intracranial pressure (ICP) cannot be treated by conservative methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of decompressive craniectomy in patients with intractable posttraumatic intracranial hypertension and to evaluate the patient selection criteria for this management protocol. In this study, 100 patients with severe head injuries were involved. All patients were treated according to the European Brain Injury Consortium (EBIC) guidelines for severe head injuries and were assessed based on individual initial Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS), age, Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS), presence of systemic injury, changes in ICP, presence of mass lesion and the right timing for DC. All patients presented with a GCS of 8 or below. Based on their initial GCS, the patients were divided in two groups of 60 (group I with GCS 4-5) and 40 (group II with GCS 6-8) in each, respectively. Prognosis was evaluated according to the (GOS). After treatment with DC, 84 of the patients (84%) showed unfavorable and 16 (16%) showed favorable outcomes. In group I, 58 patients (96.6%) showed unfavorable and two (3.4%) showed favorable outcomes. In group II, 26 (65%) patients showed unfavorable and 14 (25%) showed favorable outcomes. The importance of initial GCS and age in patient outcomes were statistically significant. The presence of systemic injuries or mass lesions in outcomes were not statistically significant. Based on our findings, we conclude that patients with Glasgow Coma Scores of 6-8 are the best candidates for DC treatment.

In SAH patients, if there is a macrovascular vasospasm with luminal narrowing >or=50%, there is a high likelihood (83%) of perfusion abnormality in the territory of the vasospastic vessel. There may also be perfusion abnormality without macrovascular vasospasm in the watershed areas or in the vicinity of sulcal clots.

AIM:Debate continues as to whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an effective treatment for severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). DC is mostly used as a second tier treatment option. The aim of this study was determined whether early bilateral DC is effective as a first tier treatment option in patients with STBI. MATERIAL and METHODS:The study compared two groups. Group 1 comprised 36 STBI patients for whom control of intracranial pressure (ICP) was not achieved with conservative treatment methods according to radiological and neurological findings. These patients underwent bilateral or unilateral DC as a second tier treatment. Group 2 comprised 40 STBI patients who underwent early bilateral DC as a first tier treatment. RESULTS: Group 2 patients had a mean better outcome than Group 1patients, especially for patients with a GCS 6-8. Postoperative ICP was lower in Group 2 patients than Group 1 patients. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that early bilateral DC can be effective for controlling ICP in STBI patients. It is likely the favorable outcome results for Group 2 patients reflects the relatively short time between trauma and surgery. Therefore, these data indicate early bilateral DC can be considered as a first tier treatment in STBI patients.