ObjectiveCryopreserved saphenous vein allografts have been offered as an alternative conduit for bypass in ischemic limbs. The ResultsThere was no significant difference in patency related to site of proximal or distal anastomosis, patency of runoff vessels, use of anticoagulation, age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, indication, source of graft, or use of multiple segments. Revision was required in six grafts for aneurysmal dilatation. Histologic examination of explanted sections of allografts showed no immune response, and immunosuppressive drugs were not used. ConclusionsAlthough limb salvage has been satisfactory, long-term patency rates for cryopreserved vein allografts are poor when compared with autogenous vein. The cost of cryopreserved allografts far exceeds that of prosthetic grafts, for which comparable and superior results have been reported. Use of cryopreserved vein allografts should be reserved for situations in which adequate lengths of autogenous vein do not exist and the risk of infection of prosthetic grafts is high. 664

An amputation rate of 8% to 52% and a mortality rate of 13% to 58% make vascular prosthetic graft infections the most dreaded complication facing a vascular surgeon. In 1978 a randomized prospective double-blind study reported a statistically significant decrease in wound infections in patients treated with prophylactic antibiotics whereas the graft infection difference only approached statistical significance. The present study reviews 2614 arterial prosthetic grafts implanted from January 1975 through June 1986. Twenty-four patients were identified as having a prosthetic graft infection, yielding an overall infection rate of 0.92%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism, occurring in one third of the cases. The most common graft material was polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (33%) followed by Dacron (29%), composite PTFE and Dacron (20%), and umbilical vein grafts (9%). Diabetes was a common factor in one third of the patients. Symptoms of infection were present in 15 patients (63%) within 3 months of operation, with 11 patients showing symptoms within 30 days. The longest interval between operation and onset of symptoms was 48 months. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered to 22 of the 24 patients, but in only 7 of the 22 (29.5%) were they given according to our usual practice. All patients required removal of the infected prosthesis, with limb loss in 17% and death in 17%.

The traditional approach to recurrent carotid stenosis has been repeat endarterectomy or patch angioplasty. Concern with the durability of repeat carotid endarterectomy has resulted in our use of carotid resection with autogenous graft interposition. This study was designed to determine the outcome and efficacy of carotid resection compared with repeat carotid endarterectomy in the management of recurrent carotid stenosis. From 1974 to 1991, 162 operations (repeat carotid endarterectomy 105, carotid resection 57) were performed for recurrent carotid stenosis. Indication for operation was hemispheric symptoms in 63% of patients, nonlateralizing symptoms in 25%, asymptomatic stenosis in 7%, and previous stroke in 5%. Ninety-one percent of patients had stenosis greater than 90% on arteriography. The perioperative stroke rate for carotid resection was 3.5%, with a subsequent rate of 0.0064 strokes per year. For repeat carotid endarterectomy, the perioperative stroke rate was 1.9% with a subsequent rate of 0.011 strokes per year. Graft patency after carotid resection was 93% (mean follow-up, 35 months). Four patients treated with carotid resection had graft thrombosis, and two of the four remained asymptomatic. After repeat carotid endarterectomy, one patient had carotid thrombosis, and recurrent stenosis greater than 50% developed in 23 patients (mean follow-up, 64 months). Twenty patients treated with repeat carotid endarterectomy underwent an additional operation for further symptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis. We conclude carotid resection is a safe and effective alternative to repeat carotid endarterectomy for patients undergoing operation for recurrent carotid stenosis.