-Objective: To investigate the effect of three months of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment in intractable epilepsy. Methods: Five patients (four males, one female; ages 6 to 50 years), were enrolled in the study; their epilepsy could not be controlled by medical treatment and surgery was not indicated. rTMS was performed twice a week for three months; patients kept records of seizure frequency for an equal period of time before, during, and after rTMS sessions. rTMS was delivered to the vertex with a round coil, at an intensity 5 % below motor threshold. During rTMS sessions, 100 stimuli (five series of 20 stimuli, with one-minute intervals between series) were delivered at a frequency of 0.3 Hz. Results: Mean daily number of seizures (MDNS) decreased in three patients and increased in two during rTMS-one of these was treated for only one month; the best result was achieved in a patient with focal cortical dysplasia (reduction of 43.09 % in MDNS). In the whole patient group, there was a significant (p<0.01) decrease in MDNS of 22.8 %. Conclusions: Although prolonged rTMS treatment is safe and moderately decreases MDNS in a group of patients with intractable epilepsy, individual patient responses were mostly subtle and clinical relevance of this method is probably low. Our data suggest, however, that patients with focal cortical lesions may indeed benefit from this novel treatment. Further studies should concentrate on that patient subgroup.KEY WORDS: transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS, epilepsy.Terapia experimental da epilepsia com estimulação magnética transcraniana: ausência de melhora adicional com tratamento prolongado RESUMO -Objetivo: investigar o efeito de três meses de estimulação magnética transcraniana repetitiva (EMTr) de baixa freqüência, na epilepsia de difícil controle. Método: Cinco pacientes (quatro homens, uma mulher, idades entre 6 e 50 anos), participaram do estudo; suas crises epilépticas não puderam ser controlados por tratamento medicamentoso e não tinham indicação cirúrgica; a EMTr foi realizada duas vezes por semana durante três meses, sendo que os pacientes anotaram o número diário de crises neste perío-do, assim como nos três meses anteriores e posteriores ao tratamento. A aplicação da EMTr foi feita no vértex com bobina circular, com intensidade 5% abaixo do limiar motor. Durante as sessões de EMTr, 100 estímulos (5 séries de 20 estímulos, com um minuto de intervalo entre as séries) foram realizadas na freqüência de 0,3 Hz. Resultados: A média diária de crises (MDC) decresceu em três pacientes e aumentou em dois durante o uso da EMTr; um destes casos foi tratado somente por um mês; o melhor resultado foi encontrado em um paciente com displasia cortical focal (redução de 43,09% na MDC). Em todo o grupo de pacientes, houve decréscimo significativo na MDC de 22,8% (p<0,01). Conclusão: Embora o tratamento prolongado com a EMTr seja seguro e tenha sido registrado decréscimo moderado da MDC em um grupo de pacientes com epilepsia de difí...
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has recently been investigated as a possible adjuvant treatment for many neuropsychiatric disorders, and has already been approved for the treatment of drug-resistant depression in the United States and in Brazil, among other countries. Although its use in other neuropsychiatric disorders is still largely experimental, many physicians have been using it as an off-label add-on therapy for various disorders. More recently, another technique, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has also become available as a much cheaper and portable alternative to TMS, although its mechanisms of action are different from those of TMS. The use of off-label therapeutic TMS or tDCS tends to occur in the setting of diseases that are notoriously resistant to other treatment modalities. Here we discuss the case of anxiety disorders, namely panic and post-traumatic stress disorders, highlighting the uncertainties and potential problems and benefits of the clinical use of these neuromodulatory techniques at the current stage of knowledge.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been shown to reduce cravings in tobacco addiction; however, results have been somewhat mixed. In this study, we hypothesized that motivation to quit smoking is a critical factor of tDCS effects in smokers. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of both tDCS and motivation to quit on cigarette consumption and the relationship between these two factors. DLPFC tDCS was applied once a day for 5 days. Our primary outcome was the amount of cigarettes smoked per day. We collected this information at baseline (d1), at the end of the treatment period (d5), 2 days later (d7) and at the 4-week follow-up (d35). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for motivation to quit was collected at the same time-points. 36 subjects (45 ± 11 years old; 24.2 ± 11.5 cigarettes daily smoked, 21 women) were randomized to receive either active or sham tDCS. In our multivariate analysis, as to take into account the mediation and moderation effects of motivation to quit, we found a significant main effect of tDCS, showing that tDCS was associated with a significant reduction of cigarettes smoked per day. We also showed a significant interaction effect of motivation to quit and treatment, supporting our hypothesis that tDCS effects were moderated by motivation to quit, indicating that higher levels of motivation were associated with a larger tDCS response. We found that the participants' motivation to quit alone, both at baseline and at follow-up, does not explain the decrease in the average cigarette consumption. Repetitive prefrontal tDCS coupled with high motivation significantly reduced cigarette consumption up to 4-weeks post-intervention.Clinical Trial Registration: http://ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02146014.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.