Background: Our aim was to compare caudal epidural versus general anaesthesia in paediatric patients for safety, efficacy, post-operative analgesia, cost effectiveness and surgeon's comfort. Material and Methods: 60 paediatric patients 2 -6 years of ASA grade I and II posted for infra-umbilical surgery were randomly divided in to two groups. Group C (n=30) received caudal block anaesthesia using 0.25% Ropivacaine 1ml kg -1 . Group G (n=30) received general anesthesia with Thiopentone sodium, Succinylscoline as induction agent and O 2 , N 2 O, Isoflurane and incremental doses of Atracurium as maintenance. They were extubated in a usual manner after surgery. In both groups pain was assessed by observer pain score. Observation and Results: Cost was less in group C. There was no significant change in hemodynamics in both groups. Duration of rescue analgesia was significant less in group G. Rate of post-operative complication was higher in group G. caudal anaesthesia was much accepted by surgeon. Conclusion: Caudal epidural is quite inexpensive with excellent anaesthesia and satisfactory post-operative analgesia with lesser complication rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.