ICDs are the therapy of choice in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Mortality, morbidity, and complication rates including appropriate and inappropriate therapies are unknown when ICDs are used in routine medical care and not in well-defined patients included in multicenter trials. Therefore, the data of 3,344 patients (61.1 +/- 12.1 years; 80.2% men; CAD 64.6%, dilated cardiomyopathy 18.9%; NYHA Class I-III: 19.1%, 54.3%, 20.1%, respectively; LVEF > 0.50: 0.234, LVEF 0.30-0.50: 0.472, LVEF < 0.30: 0.293, respectively) implanted in 62 German hospitals between January 1998 and October 2000 were prospectively collected and analyzed as a part of the European Registry of Implantable Defibrillators (EURID Germany). The 1-year survival rate was 93.5%. Patients in NYHA Class III and aLVEF < 0.30 had a lower survival rate than patients in NYHA Class I and a preserved LVEF (0.852 vs 0.975,P = 0.0001). Including the 1-year follow-up, 49.5% of patients had an intervention by the ICD, 39.8% had appropriate ICD therapies, 16.2% had inappropriate therapies. Overall, 1,691 hospital readmissions were recorded. The main causes for hospital readmissions were ventricular arrhythmias (61.3%) and congestive heart failure symptoms (12.9%). Thus, demographic data and mortality of patients treated with an ICD in conditions of standard medical care seems to be comparable and based on, or congruent with, the large secondary preventions trials. When ICDs are used in standard medical care, the 1-year survival rate is high, especially in patients with NYHA Class I and preserved LVEF. However, nearly half of all patients suffer from ICD intervention.

The atrial origin of accessory connections with Mahaim-type preexcitation is apparently confined to the anterolateral-to-posterolateral region of the tricuspid annulus. Mechanical conduction block in the atrial input to the accessory fiber induced at the subannular level by catheter manipulation provides an optimal marker to locate the ablation site, even during atrial fibrillation. To expose early recurrence of antegrade accessory pathway conduction, intermittent atrial pacing in the 12 hours after ablation is advisable; in cases of recurrence, a repeat procedure can readily be performed using just the ablation catheter advanced to the target site at the tricuspid annulus.

Background-The tachycardia detection interval (TDI) in implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) is conventionally programmed according to the slowest documented ventricular tachycardia (VT), with a safety margin of 30 to 60 ms. With this margin, VTs above the TDI may occur. However, longer TDIs are associated with an increased risk of inappropriate therapy. We hypothesized that patients with slow VTs (Ͻ200 bpm) may benefit from a long TDI and a dual-chamber detection algorithm compared with a conventionally programmed single-chamber ICD. Methods and Results-Patients with VTs Ͻ200 bpm were implanted with a dual-chamber ICD that was randomly programmed to a dual-chamber algorithm and a TDI of Ն469 ms or to a single-chamber algorithm with a TDI 30 to 60 ms above the slowest documented VT cycle length and the enhancement criteria of cycle length variation and acceleration. The primary combined end point was the number of all inappropriate therapies, VTs above the TDI, and VTs with significant therapy delay (Ͼ2 minutes). After 6 months, a crossover analysis was performed. Total follow-up was 1 year. One hundred two patients were included in the study. The programmed TDI was 500Ϯ36 ms during the dual-chamber phase and 424Ϯ63 ms during the single-chamber phase. For the primary end point (inappropriate therapies, VTs above the TDI, or VTs with detection delay), a moderate superiority of the dual-chamber mode was found: Mann-Whitney estimatorϭ0.6661; 95% CI, 0.5565 to 0.7758; Pϭ0.0040. Conclusions-Dual-chamber detection with a longer TDI improves VT detection and does not increase the rate of inappropriate therapies despite a considerable increase in tachycardia burden.