Internal stresses in injection molded components, a principal cause of shrinkage and warpage, are predicted using a three‐dimensional numerical simulation of the residual stress development in moldings of polystyrene and high‐density polyethylene. These residual stresses are mainly frozen‐in thermal stresses due to inhomogeneous cooling, when surface layers stiffen sooner than the core region as in free quenching. Additional factors in injection molding are the effects of melt pressure history and mechanical restraints of the mold. Transient temperature and pressure fields from simulation of the injection molding cycle are used for calculating the developing normal stress distributions. Theoretical predictions are compared with measurements performed on injection molded flat plates using the layer removal method on rectangular specimens. The thermal stress development in the thinwalled moldings is analyzed using models that assume linear thermo‐elastic and linear thermo‐viscoelastic compressible behavior of the polymeric materials. Polymer crystallization effects on stresses are examined. Stresses are obtained implicitly using displacement formulations, and the governing equations are solved numerically using a finite element method. Results show that residual stress behavior can be represented reasonably well for both the amorphous and the semicrystalline polymer. Similarities in behavior between theory and experiment indicate that both material models provide satisfactory results, but the best predictions of large stresses developed at the wall surface are obtained with the thermo‐viscoelastic analysis.

Interfacial tension is one of the most important parameters that govern the morphology of polymer blends and the quality of adhesion between polymers. However, few data are available on interfacial tension due to experimental difficulties. A pendant drop apparatus was used for the determination of the interfacial tension for the polymer pair polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS). The effects of temperature and molecular weight were evaluated. The range of temperatures used was from 178° to 250°C, and the range of molecular weights used was from 1590 to 400,000. The interfacial tension decreased linearly with increasing temperature. With only one exception, higher molecular weight systems showed weaker dependence of interfacial tension on temperature than lower molecular weight systems. Also, polydisperse systems showed a stronger dependency on temperature than the monodisperse systems. The value of the interfacial tension, which increases with molecular weight, appears to level off at molecular weights above the entanglement chain length. For the polymer pair PP/PS, the dependency of the interfacial tension on the number average molecular weight appears to follow the well‐known semi‐empirical (−2/3) power rule over most of the range of molecular weights. Comparable correlations were obtained with values of the power between −1/2 and −1.0.

No abstract

The commonly used thermodynamic theories (mean field theory and the square gradient theory) to predict interfacial tension between polymers have been modified. The results of these theoretical developments have not yet been fully tested and compared to experimental data. In this paper, experimental data for the effects of temperature, molecular weight, and molecular weight dispersity on interfacial tension for polypropylene/polystyrene polymer pairs are compared with the predictions of the new versions of the above theories. To evaluate these theories, it is necessary to know the Flory‐Huggins interaction parameter for the polymer pairs studied. The relation correlating the Flory‐Huggins interaction parameter to the Hildebrand solubility parameter was not suitable for evaluating the theoretical predictions of interfacial tension. Instead, the Flory Huggins interaction parameter was expressed as the sum of an enthalpic contribution, χH, and entropic contribution, χs. In the absence of reliable experimental values, a method was developed to evaluate the two contributions, based on interfacial tension data. The procedure provided an interaction parameter that is allowed to depend on molecular weight. When this approach was used, the predictions of only the new version of the square gradient theory were in good agreement with the experimental data for the influence of temperature and molecular weight on interfacial tension. However, the theory predicted the effect of polydispersity on interfacial tension only at high temperatures.