Purpose:We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs. Methods: This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews. Results: Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246). Conclusion: High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.
Introduction: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction needs a large and long graft. An allograft is a preferable option for thicker graft but its availability is limited in Indonesia. Alternatively, autograft needs to be folded several times for sufficient thickness but it will be shorter and only applicable for the inside-out method. We present a case of PCL reconstruction using a double adjustable button fixation with the outside-in tibia tunneling method. Case Presentation: A fifty-five-year-old male came to our office with an unstable right knee after he fell 1 month ago. Physical examination showed positive posterior drawer and mild right knee effusion, other findings were normal. MRI revealed a total PCL rupture. Two weeks later, the PCL reconstruction was done using autograft from gracillis and semitendinous. A large adjustable button was placed on the tibia tunnel, using the outside-in technique. Knee was stable postoperatively. Discussion: PCL reconstruction using double adjustable buttons was chosen to accommodate larger but shorter autografts. The outside-in tibial tunnel has less risk of graft laxity less expensive and more simple technically compared to inside-out adjustable button tunnel. Conclusion: Tibial fixation using an adjustable large button should be considered in PCL reconstruction with short autograft.
Introduction: Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis (RCCT) frequently manifests as acute shoulder pain during the acute resorptive phase. Pain typically worse at night and limited range of motion (ROM) with muscle spasm. Several treatment options have been proposed. In this case, a single needle ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage (UGPL) combined with corticosteroid subdeltoid bursa injection (SDBI) with a good outcome. Case Presentation: A Female, 59 years old, presents with left RCCT acute pain (VAS 7/10) for 2 days and limited painful shoulder ROM. Inflammation and local tenderness found on the left shoulder, ultrasonography shows calcification in the left infraspinatus tendon with sub-deltoid bursa fluid. Patient in sitting position, ultrasound probe placed at long axis of infraspinatus tendon. Using a 23G needle 5 ml syringe, 1% lidocaine infiltrated until the needle penetrates the calcification site. Then a small amount of normal saline (NaCl) with lidocaine injected in a pulsating manner, observed until chalky matter backflows, mixed with NaCl in the syringe. Repeat this procedure until chalky backflow is minimal. Finally, 10 ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg mixed with 2 ml lidocaine 2% SDBI using the same needle. Dramatic shoulder pain relieve (VAS 2/10) is immediately achieved after the procedure. One week follow up, the patient is pain-free and regains full ROM of her left shoulder. Discussion: Several methods are proposed for the treatment of acute RCCT, including corticosteroid injection and arthroscopy debridement. UPGL is an attractive option because it is minimally invasive, can be performed in-office setting, and pain relief is obtained immediately by decompressing and removing inflamed calcified sites. Conclusion: The treatment in acute pain RCCT using UGPL combined with corticosteroid SDBI provides a good outcome.
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral causes of foot drop are widely known. However, causes stemming from the central nervous system are rare. Posterior tibial tendon (PTT) transfer has been widely used for treating peripheral causes of foot drop but not central causes. We report a case of central foot drop (CFD) that was corrected with PTT transfer. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old female presented with progressive weakness and numbness of both feet due to old compression fracture of the 12th thoracic spine. She also had Parkinson disease with gait rigidity. The patient was diagnosed with central foot drop. The left foot PTT transfer was done through the interosseous membrane and fixed to the navicular bone with an interference screw. Three months after the procedure, there is an improvement on the gait, and the foot drop is corrected. PTT transfer has a good outcome in peripheral foot drop. However, it is still questionable for the CFD case. In our case, PTT transfer was considered because it is less invasive, and tenodesis or ankle fusion still could be performed later if the PTT transfer outcome is not favorable. CONCLUSION: PTT transfer is a possible option to correct CFD. It is less invasive and has a good outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.