Background: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common cyanotic congenital heart disease, and sudden cardiac death represents an important mode of death in these patients. Data evaluating the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in this patient population remain scarce. Methods: Nationwide French Registry including all TOF patients with an ICD initiated in 2010 by the French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The primary time to event endpoint was the time from ICD implantation to first appropriate ICD therapy. Secondary outcomes included ICD-related complications, heart transplantation, and death. Clinical events were centrally adjudicated by a blinded committee. Results: A total of 165 patients (mean age 42.2±13.3 years, 70.1% males) were included from 40 centers, including 104 (63.0%) in secondary prevention. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (2.5-11.4) years, 78 (47.3%) patients received at least one appropriate ICD therapy. The annual incidence of the primary outcome was 10.5% (7.1% and 12.5% in primary and secondary prevention, respectively, p=0.03). Overall, 71 (43.0%) patients presented with at least one ICD complication, including inappropriate shocks in 42 (25.5%) patients and lead dysfunction in 36 (21.8%) patients. Among 61 (37.0%) primary prevention patients, the annual rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 4.1%, 5.3%, 9.5%, and 13.3% in patients with respectively no, one, two, or ≥ three guideline-recommended risk factors. QRS fragmentation was the only independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (HR 3.47, 95% CI 1.19-10.11), and its integration in a model with current criteria increased the 5-year time-dependent area under the curve from 0.68 to 0.81 (p=0.006). Patients with congestive heart failure and/or reduced LVEF had a higher risk of non-arrhythmic death or heart transplantation (HR=11.01, 95% CI: 2.96-40.95). Conclusions: Patients with TOF and an ICD experience high rates of appropriate therapies, including those implanted in primary prevention. The considerable long-term burden of ICD-related complications, however, underlines the need for careful candidate selection. A combination of easy-to-use criteria including QRS fragmentation might improve risk stratification. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03837574
Aims Limited data exist concerning fragmented QRS complexes (fQRSs) on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) of apparently healthy athletes. We aimed to study the prevalence and significance of fQRS in lead V1 (fQRSV1), representing right ventricular (RV) activation, regarding training-induced RV morphological remodelling. Methods and results Between January 2017 and August 2019, 434 consecutive non-sedentary subjects underwent preparticipation cardiovascular screening, including a 12-lead ECG. Three hundred and ninety-three apparently healthy subjects were included, 119 of them were athletes (defined as performing ≥8 h/week for the last 6 months) and 274 were non-athletes. All athletes underwent two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Fragmented QRS complex in lead V1 pattern was defined as a narrow (<120 ms) and quadriphasic QRS complex in lead V1. Fragmented QRS complex in lead V1 was more frequent in athletes compared with non-athletes (22% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and was independently associated with the athlete status [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.693, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.299—9.583; P < 0.001], the endurance category (aOR = 2.522, 95% CI 1.176—5.408; P = 0.017), and age (aOR = 0.962, 95% CI 0.934–0.989; P = 0.007) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of athletes, fQRSV1 was independently associated with mean RV outflow tract diameter (aOR = 1.458, 95% CI 1.105–1.923; P = 0.008) and age (aOR = 0.941, 95% CI 0.894–0.989; P = 0.017) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Fragmented QRS complex in lead V1 is a newly described, frequent, ECG pattern in young and apparently healthy athletes and is associated with training-induced RV remodelling.
BackgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have emerged as potential atrial fibrillation (AF) preventive therapy, but inconsistent results have been reported. We aimed to examine the effects of MRAs on AF occurrence and explore factors that could influence the magnitude of the effect size.Methods and ResultsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were used to search for randomized clinical trials and observational studies addressing the effect of MRAs on AF occurrence from database inception through April 03, 2018. We performed a systematic review and random effects meta‐analyses to compute odds ratios with 95% CIs. Meta‐regression was then applied to explore the sources of between‐study heterogeneity. We included 24 studies, 11 randomized clinical trials and 13 observational cohorts, representing a total number of 7914 patients (median age: 64.2 years; median left ventricular ejection fraction: 49.7%; median follow‐up: 12.0 months), 2843 (35.9%) of whom received MRA therapy. Meta‐analyses showed a significant overall reduction in AF occurrence in the MRA‐treated patients versus the control groups (15.0% versus 32.2%; odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44–0.70 [P<0.00001]), with the greatest benefit regarding recurrent AF episodes (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31–0.59 [P<0.00001]) and with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (I 2=54%; P=0.0008). Meta‐regression analyses showed that effect size was significantly associated with older studies and higher AF occurrence rate in the control groups.Conclusions MRAs seem to be effective in AF prevention, especially regarding recurrent AF episodes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.