This paper reports the effects of nutrient magnesium (Mg) concentrations on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of clonal Pinus radiata from four female parents (families) known to differ in their tolerance to Mg deficiency and in their needle Mg concentrations. Plants were grown in flowing nutrient solutions with 2 mg l −" (control) and 0.8 mg l −" (low) Mg. Plant growth, needle Mg concentration, photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and carotenoid pigment content were measured. At low Mg, needle Mg concentration was about half that of control plants, height growth was reduced 15-25%, and the needles showed strong visual characteristics of Mg deficiency. Photosynthesis was also halved, and was associated with closure of the stomata under low Mg and with reductions in the residual conductance. In needles from plants grown at low Mg, photochemical yield was reduced both in the light and in the dark, and was strongly dependent on needle Mg concentrations below a threshold concentration of 0.02-0.025% (d. wt basis). The electron transport rate (ETR) at saturating photon flux density in low-Mg-grown needles was reduced to about half that of their Mg controls, but the photon efficiency of ETR was unaffected by the Mg concentration the plants were grown in. Photosynthetic quenching was markedly reduced and non-photosynthetic quenching was increased following growth in low Mg. Growth under low Mg also increased levels of zeaxanthin. Although family differences in growth and photosynthetic physiology were present, few familyiMg interactions were significant. We conclude that Mg deficiency probably affects growth through severe reductions in photosynthesis.
Increased carbon storage with afforestation leads to a decrease in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and thus decreases radiative forcing and cools the Earth. However, land-use change also changes the reflective properties of the surface vegetation from more reflective pasture to relatively less reflective forest cover. This increase in radiation absorption by the forest constitutes an increase in radiative forcing, with a warming effect. The net effect of decreased albedo and carbon storage on radiative forcing depends on the relative magnitude of these two opposing processes. <br><br> We used data from an intensively studied site in New Zealand's Central North Island that has long-term, ground-based measurements of albedo over the full short-wave spectrum from a developing <i>Pinus radiata</i> forest. Data from this site were supplemented with satellite-derived albedo estimates from New Zealand pastures. The albedo of a well-established forest was measured as 13 % and pasture albedo as 20 %. We used these data to calculate the direct radiative forcing effect of changing albedo as the forest grew. <br><br> We calculated the radiative forcing resulting from the removal of carbon from the atmosphere as a decrease in radiative forcing of −104 GJ tC<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. We also showed that the observed change in albedo constituted a direct radiative forcing of 2759 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Thus, following afforestation, 26.5 tC ha<sup>−1</sup> needs to be stored in a growing forest to balance the increase in radiative forcing resulting from the observed albedo change. Measurements of tree biomass and albedo were used to estimate the net change in radiative forcing as the newly planted forest grew. Albedo and carbon-storage effects were of similar magnitude for the first four to five years after tree planting, but as the stand grew older, the carbon storage effect increasingly dominated. Averaged over the whole length of the rotation, the changes in albedo negated the benefits from increased carbon storage by 17–24 %
Abstract. Increased carbon storage with afforestation leads to a decrease in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and thus decreases radiative forcing and cools the Earth. However, afforestation also changes the reflective properties of the surface vegetation from more reflective pasture to relatively less reflective forest cover. This increase in radiation absorption by the forest constitutes an increase in radiative forcing, with a warming effect. The net effect of decreased albedo and carbon storage on radiative forcing depends on the relative magnitude of these two opposing processes.We used data from an intensively studied site in New Zealand's Central North Island that has long-term, groundbased measurements of albedo over the full short-wave spectrum from a developing Pinus radiata forest. Data from this site were supplemented with satellite-derived albedo estimates from New Zealand pastures. The albedo of a wellestablished forest was measured as 13 % and pasture albedo as 20 %. We used these data to calculate the direct radiative forcing effect of changing albedo as the forest grew.We calculated the radiative forcing resulting from the removal of carbon from the atmosphere as a decrease in radiative forcing of −104 GJ tC −1 yr −1 . We also showed that the observed change in albedo constituted a direct radiative forcing of 2759 GJ ha −1 yr −1 . Thus, following afforestation, 26.5 tC ha −1 needs to be stored in a growing forest to balance the increase in radiative forcing resulting from the observed albedo change. Measurements of tree biomass and albedo were used to estimate the net change in radiative forcing as the newly planted forest grew. Albedo and carbon-storage effects were of similar magnitude for the first Correspondence to: M. U. F. Kirschbaum (kirschbaumm@landcareresearch.co.nz) four to five years after tree planting, but as the stand grew older, the carbon storage effect increasingly dominated. Averaged over the whole length of the rotation, the changes in albedo negated the benefits from increased carbon storage by 17-24 %.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.