OVID-19 is caused by the recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). While the majority of COVID-19 infections are relatively mild, with recovery typically within 2-3 weeks 1,2 , a significant number of patients develop severe illness, which is postulated to be related to both an overactive immune response and viral-induced pathology 3,4. The role of T cell immune responses in disease pathogenesis and longer-term protective immunity is currently poorly defined, but essential to understand in order to inform therapeutic interventions and vaccine design. Currently, there are many ongoing vaccine trials, but it is unknown whether they will provide long-lasting protective immunity. Most vaccines are designed to induce antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, but it is not yet known if this will be sufficient to induce full protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 (refs. 5-8). Studying natural immunity to the virus, including the role of SARS-CoV-2specific T cells, is critical to fill the current knowledge gaps for improved vaccine design. For many primary virus infections, it typically takes 7-10 d to prime and expand adaptive T cell immune responses in order to control the virus 9. This coincides with the typical time it takes for patients with COVID-19 to either recover or develop severe illness. There is an incubation time of 4-7 d before symptom onset and a further 7-10 d before individuals progress to severe disease 10 .

AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to all of the participants for donating their samples and data for these analyses, and the research teams involved in the consenting, recruitment and sampling of these participants. We acknowledge the support of ISARIC4C Investigators. This work is supported byAbstract COVID-19 is an ongoing global crisis in which the development of effective vaccines and therapeutics will depend critically on understanding the natural immunity to the virus, including the role of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. We have conducted a study of 42 patients following recovery from COVID-19, including 28 mild and 14 severe cases, comparing their T cell responses to those of 16 control donors. We assessed the immune memory of T cell responses using IFNγ based assays with overlapping peptides spanning SARS-CoV-2 apart from ORF1. We found the breadth, magnitude and frequency of memory T cell responses from COVID-19 were significantly higher in severe compared to mild COVID-19 cases, and this effect was most marked in response to spike, membrane, and ORF3a proteins. Total and spike-specific T cell responses correlated with the anti-Spike, anti-Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) as well as anti-Nucleoprotein (NP) endpoint antibody titre (p<0.001, <0.001 and =0.002). We identified 39 separate peptides containing CD4 + and/or CD8 + epitopes, which strikingly included six immunodominant epitope clusters targeted by T cells in many donors, including 3 clusters in spike (recognised by 29%, 24%, 18% donors), two in the membrane protein (M, 32%, 47%) and one in the nucleoprotein (Np, 35%). CD8+ responses were further defined for their HLA restriction, including B*4001-restricted T cells showing central memory and effector memory phenotype. In mild cases, higher frequencies of multi-cytokine producing M-and NP-specific CD8 + T cells than spike-specific CD8 + T cells were observed. They furthermore showed a higher ratio of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + to CD4 + T cell responses.Immunodominant epitope clusters and peptides containing T cell epitopes identified in this study will provide critical tools to study the role of virus-specific T cells in control and resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infections. The identification of T cell specificity and functionality associated with milder disease, highlights the potential importance of including non-spike proteins within future COVID-19 vaccine design.

Identification of protective T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 requires distinguishing people infected with SARS-CoV-2 from those with cross-reactive immunity to other coronaviruses. Here we show a range of T cell assays that differentially capture immune function to characterise SARS-CoV-2 responses. Strong ex vivo ELISpot and proliferation responses to multiple antigens (including M, NP and ORF3) are found in 168 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected volunteers, but are rare in 119 uninfected volunteers. Highly exposed seronegative healthcare workers with recent COVID-19-compatible illness show T cell response patterns characteristic of infection. By contrast, >90% of convalescent or unexposed people show proliferation and cellular lactate responses to spike subunits S1/S2, indicating pre-existing cross-reactive T cell populations. The detection of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 is therefore critically dependent on assay and antigen selection. Memory responses to specific non-spike proteins provide a method to distinguish recent infection from pre-existing immunity in exposed populations.

A major issue in identification of protective T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 lies in distinguishing people infected with SARS-CoV-2 from those with cross-reactive immunity generated by exposure to other coronaviruses. We characterised SARS-CoV-2 T cell immune responses in 168 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects and 118 seronegative subjects without known SARS-CoV-2 exposure using a range of T cell assays that differentially capture immune cell function. Strong ex vivo ELISpot and proliferation responses to multiple antigens (including M, NP and ORF3) were found in those who had been infected by SARS-CoV-2 but were rare in pre-pandemic and unexposed seronegative subjects. However, seronegative doctors with high occupational exposure and recent COVID-19 compatible illness showed patterns of T cell responses characteristic of infection, indicating that these readouts are highly sensitive. By contrast, over 90% of convalescent or unexposed people showed proliferation and cellular lactate responses to spike subunits S1/S2, indicating pre-existing cross-reactive T cell populations. The detection of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 is therefore critically dependent on the choice of assay and antigen. Memory responses to specific non-spike proteins provides a method to distinguish recent infection from pre-existing immunity in exposed populations.

Isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol are commonly used for the treatment of tuberculosis. Drug exposure is occasionally associated with liver and/or skin injury. The aim of this study was to determine whether drug-specific T-cells are detectable in patients with adverse reactions and if so characterize the nature of the T-cell response. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 6 patients with anti-tuberculosis drug-related adverse reactions (4 liver, 2 skin) were used to detect drug-responsive T-lymphocytes. Positive lymphocyte transformation test and/or ELIspot results were observed with all 6 patients. Over 3400 T-cell clones were generated from isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, or ethambutol-treated PBMC. CD4+ clones from all 3 patients were activated to proliferate and secrete cytotoxic mediators (granzyme B, perforin, FasL) and effector (IFN-γ, Il-13) and regulatory (Il-10) cytokines with isoniazid, but not rifampicin, pyrazinamide, or ethambutol. Il-17 was not detected, while only 1 clone secreted Il-22. Isoniazid-responsive clones were not activated with other anti-tuberculosis drugs or isonicotinic acid albumin adducts. Activation of the clones with isoniazid was MHC class II-restricted and dependent on antigen-presenting cells. Most clones were activated rapidly even in the presence of the enzyme inhibitor 1-aminobenzotriazole. However, a time-dependent pathway of activation involving auto-oxidation of isoniazid was also observed. The discovery of isoniazid-specific CD4+ T-cell clones in patients with liver and skin injury suggests that the adaptive immune system is involved in the pathogenesis of both forms of iatrogenic disease.