No abstract

Focal cryoablation can provide biochemical and local control of prostate cancer while preserving potency and continence. Further investigation is needed.

No abstract

Objectives• To present the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage focal (SFC) and salvage total (STC) cryoablation for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after failed primary radiotherapy. Patients and Methods• From March 2003 to August 2010, 50 men with biopsy-proven unilateral (n = 25) or bilateral (n = 25) radio-recurrent PCa underwent SFC or STC, respectively. • Patients were assessed after treatment by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, transrectal ultrasonography, biopsy and questionnaires. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined using the Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2 mg/mL).• Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Results• The median pre-cryoablation PSA level and Gleason score were, respectively, 2.8 ng/mL and 7 for SFC, and 3.9 ng/mL and 7 for STC. The median follow-up was 31 and 53 months (P = 0.004) for SFC and STC, respectively.• Oncological outcomes were as follows: no patient died; one patient who underwent STC developed bone metastases; eight patients who underwent SFC and three who underwent STC had BF and the 5-year BF-free survival rates were 54 and 86%, respectively. In those patients without BF, the mean PSA decreased by 86% for SFC and 90% for STC within the first year and remained stable.• Functional outcomes were as follows: new onset urinary incontinence occurred in three (13%) patients in the STC group, whereas no patient in the SFC group developed incontinence (P = 0.10); Two of seven patients in the SFC group retained postoperative potency, but none of the four potent patients in the STC group recovered potency postoperatively (P = 0.48); one (4%) patient in the STC group developed a recto-urethral fistula, but none occurred in the SFC group (P = 0.48). Conclusions• SFC and STC are feasible and safe with acceptable mid-term oncological outcomes. For carefully selected patients, SFC is an option that could be associated with lower treatment-related morbidity compared with STC.• Although longer follow-up and more patient numbers are needed, our initial oncological and functional outcomes of SFC and STC are encouraging.

While the prognostic value of DNA ploidy has been well established for radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation, brachytherapy and androgen deprivation therapy its role as a survival outcome predictor for prostate cancer patients treated with cryoablation has not yet been examined. Anecdotal evidence suggesting that cryoablation may be independent of DNA ploidy type led to the implementation of the current study. Retrospective analysis of data including flow digital cytometry was performed on 447 archival specimens taken from patients who had undergone cryosurgical ablation of primary prostate cancer. Five-year biochemical disease free survivals (bDFS) (defined as PSA thresholds of 0.5 and 1.0 ng/ml) were determined with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were grouped according to DNA ploidy types then stratified by Gleason grade, risk group, pre-surgical PSA level, and disease stage.Mean and median age of the cohort was 65 and 64.6 years. Mean follow-up was 65.7 months. The DNA ploidy status of the population was found to be 59% diploid, 13% tetraploid, and 28% aneuploid. Using PSA < 1.0 ng/ml criterion, the bDFS rates for diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid were 78%, 75%, and 79% respectively. The bDFS rates using a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml criterion were 67%, 59%, and 69% for diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid groups. No significant outcome differences were found in stratified analysis. This investigation demonstrates that the efficacy of cryoablation is independent of DNA ploidy type.