No abstract

Introductory biology students struggle to incorporate the molecular genetic origin of variation in their evolutionary reasoning framework. Meaningful learning of this concept may require 1) multiple cycles of instruction, assessment, and feedback; and 2) assessment forms, such as conceptual models, that promote and reveal mechanistic and causal reasoning.

Identity production is a complex process in which a person determines who he or she is via internal dialogue and sociocultural participation. Understanding identity production is important in biology education, because students’ identities impact classroom experiences and their willingness to persist in the discipline. Thus, we suggest that educators foster spaces where students can engage in producing science identities that incorporate positive perceptions of who they are and what they have experienced. We used Holland’s theory of identity and Urrieta’s definitions of conceptual identity production (CIP) and procedural identity production (PIP) to explore the process of students’ science identity production. We interviewed 26 students from five sections of a general biology course for majors at one higher education institution. The interview protocol included items about students’ identities, influential experiences, perceptions of science, and perceptions of their classroom communities. From the interviews, we developed hierarchical coding schemes that focused on characterizing students’ CIP and PIP. Here, we describe how students’ socially constructed identities (race, gender, etc.) and their experiences may have impacted the production of their science identities. We found that authoring (i.e., making meaning of) experiences and recognition by others as a community member influenced students’ science identity production.

Student success in large enrollment undergraduate science courses which utilize "active learning" and Learning Assistant (LA) support is a complex phenomenon. It is often ill-defined, is likely impacted by many factors, and regularly interacts with a variety of treatments or interventions. Defining, measuring, and modeling student success as a factor of multiple inputs is the focus of our work. Because this endeavor is complex and multifaceted, there is a need for strong theoretical framing. Without such explicit framing, we argue that our findings would be uninterpretable. In this paper we describe our efforts to define that theoretical framework, present the framework, and describe how it defines our methodological approach, analyses, and future work.

Background The success of the learning assistant (LA) model has largely been attributed to LA facilitation of active learning tasks. A deeper understanding of how LAs facilitate these tasks would inform LA training and support successful adoption of the LA model. Our investigation of LA actions during their interaction with students in the classroom contributes to that understanding. We present and discuss the development of the action taxonomy for learning assistants (ATLAs), as well as illustrate its applicability by presenting some analyses that were conducted on sample data. Results The LAs carried out several different actions that we categorized broadly as LA-Directed Facilitation, LA-Guided Facilitation, Advice, Feedback, Course-Related Talk, and Non-Course-Related Talk. LA-Directed Facilitation and LA-Guided Facilitation were the most common types of actions observed. We found that LA actions varied by course. Conclusions ATLAs is a tool that can be used to examine LA actions. In our sample data set, LAs undertook many different actions during interactions with students which indicates that LAs play several different roles in the classroom. These findings have practical implications not only for faculty seeking to implement a peer instruction model such as the LA model, but also for instructors wanting to utilize LAs in their courses more effectively. Understanding what the LAs are doing during interactions with students can provide us insight into the different roles that LAs undertake. Knowledge of these roles will guide effective training, feedback, and direction of LAs, particularly during the pedagogy course.