No abstract

Noninvasive indexes have been developed to predict fibrosis staging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these indexes in comparison with liver histology in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. A total of 235 consecutive patients with HCV infection from the Fibropaca multicentre independent study were included in this paper. FibroTest (FT), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Forns score were assessed in the cohort and compared with liver histology performed on the same day. The main end point was the area under characteristic curves (AUCs) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and cirrhosis (F4) by the METAVIR classification. Mean age was 46 (+/-11) years, 55% were males, 42% (n = 99) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and 7% (n = 16) had cirrhosis (F4). For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, respective AUCs of FT, APRI and Forns score were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.86), 0.71 (0.67-0.79) and 0.76 (0.70-0.82); for cirrhosis prognosis, AUCs of FT and APRI were 0.82 (0.77-0.87) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) (AUCs not significantly different). Using each index independently, all patients were classified by FT, 214 (91%) patients were classified by APRI and 129 (55%) by Forns score. There were significantly more cases of discordances between APRI and liver biopsy than between FT or Forns score and liver biopsy (P < 0.05). Performing all scores (FT, Forns and APRI) without liver biopsy allowed fibrosis to be well evaluated in 191 patients (81.3%), including patients with FT failure. Liver biopsy remained mandatory to evaluate fibrosis in 44 patients (18.7%). Our study shows that performing all the tests and liver biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients without patent comorbidities. The combination of all tests with liver biopsy allowed 225/235 (96%) patients to be correctly classified. The combination of all tests without liver biopsy allowed 191/235 (81.3%) patients to be correctly classified; liver biopsy remained mandatory in some patients (18.7%).

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Sorafenib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The management of its side effects is improving. This study aimed to assess, in real life, if this translates into a better prognosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective study of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib between 2007 and 2017. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 188 advanced HCC patients received &#x3e; 4 weeks of sorafenib. Median treatment duration was 5.4 months and median overall survival (mOS) 10 months (95% confidence interval 15–27). Sorafenib was initiated in 65 patients in 2007–2012 and 123 in 2013–2017. Both groups were comparable except for Barcelona Clinic liver cancer class. Tumor progression, disease control (DC) rate, and incidence of toxicity were similar in the 2 periods, but the duration of treatment (4.3 vs. 5.9 months; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01) and mOS (8 vs. 12 months; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.002) differed. Among progressive disease patients, mOS was similar (7 months) but for those who had DC at 8 weeks, mOS was longer in the recent period (13 vs. 27 months; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). In the univariate analysis of OS, the period of treatment had a prognostic value. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> When comparing 2 periods of treatment in advanced HCC patients under sorafenib, duration of treatment and mOS were higher in the recent period. While mOS did not differ for patients who progressed, it was 2-fold higher in the recent period for those who had tumor control. Improvements in the use of sorafenib seem to be associated with better outcomes limited to patients with DC.

Summary Background  Non‐invasive liver fibrosis scores such as Hepascore (HS) have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected patients. Aim  To validate HS as an alternative to liver biopsy and Fibrotest (FT) and propose five optimized combination algorithms to improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods  The cohort included 467 patients with HCV. There were 274/467 (59%) men, and mean age was 47 ± 12 years. Results  Hepascore area under ROC curves (AUC) for ≥F2, F3F4 and F4 diagnosis were 0.82, 0.84 and 0.90 respectively, in the same range as FT. HS and FT were concordant in 387/467 (82%) for fibrosis staging. Among these patients, 342/387 (88%) were concordant with liver biopsy. AUCs of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to Platelets Ratio Index (APRI) and Forns for ≥F2 were 0.76 and 0.73 (0.65–0.79) respectively. The algorithm combining APRI and HS had the highest rate of avoided liver biopsies (45%) with a high diagnostic accuracy (91%). Conclusions  Hepascore is an accurate non‐invasive marker for ≥F2 and F4 diagnosis in HCV patients. In a pragmatic approach, a stepwise optimized algorithm combining APRI and FT or HS considerably increases diagnostic accuracy and avoided liver biopsies.

In our case-control study, HCV therapy with DAAs does not accelerate or prevent early HCC recurrence compared with untreated patients. The rate of recurrence, time to progression, and HCC pattern are similar. Early DAAs treatment (<12 months) after HCC cure should be discouraged considering the HCC recurrence rate during this period.