Follistatin (FS) inhibits several members of the TGF-beta superfamily, including myostatin (Mstn), a negative regulator of muscle growth. Mstn inhibition by FS represents a potential therapeutic approach of muscle atrophy. The aim of our study was to investigate the mechanisms of the FS-induced muscle hypertrophy. To test the role of satellite cells in the FS effect, we used irradiation to destroy their proliferative capacity. FS overexpression increased the muscle weight by about 37% in control animals, but the increase reached only 20% in irradiated muscle, supporting the role of cell proliferation in the FS-induced hypertrophy. Surprisingly, the muscle hypertrophy caused by FS reached the same magnitude in Mstn-KO as in WT mice, suggesting that Mstn might not be the only ligand of FS involved in the regulation of muscle mass. To assess the role of activin (Act), another FS ligand, in the FS-induced hypertrophy, we electroporated FSI-I, a FS mutant that does not bind Act with high affinity. Whereas FS electroporation increased muscle weight by 32%, the muscle weight gain induced by FSI-I reached only 14%. Furthermore, in Mstn-KO mice, FSI-I overexpression failed to induce hypertrophy, in contrast to FS. Therefore, these results suggest that Act inhibition may contribute to FS-induced hypertrophy. Finally, the role of Act as a regulator of muscle mass was supported by the observation that ActA overexpression induced muscle weight loss (-15%). In conclusion, our results show that satellite cell proliferation and both Mstn and Act inhibition are involved in the FS-induced muscle hypertrophy.

Glucocorticoids mediate muscle atrophy in many catabolic states. Myostatin expression, a negative regulator of muscle growth, is increased by glucocorticoids and myostatin overexpression is associated with lower muscle mass. This suggests that myostatin is required for the catabolic effects of glucocorticoids. We therefore investigated whether myostatin gene disruption could prevent muscle atrophy caused by glucocorticoids. Male myostatin knockout (KO) and wild-type mice were subjected to dexamethasone treatment (1 mg/kg.d for 10 d or 5 mg/kg.d for 4 d). In wild-type mice, daily administration of low-dose dexamethasone for 10 d resulted in muscle atrophy (tibialis anterior: -15%; gastrocnemius: -13%; P < 0.01) due to 15% decrease in the muscle fiber cross-sectional area (1621 +/- 31 vs. 1918 +/- 64 microm(2), P < 0.01). In KO mice, there was no reduction of muscle mass nor fiber cross-sectional area after dexamethasone treatment. Muscle atrophy after 4 d of high-dose dexamethasone was associated with increased mRNA of enzymes involved in proteolytic pathways (atrogin-1, muscle ring finger 1, and cathepsin L) and increased chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity. In contrast, the mRNA of these enzymes and the proteasomal activity were not significantly affected by dexamethasone in KO mice. Muscle IGF-I mRNA was paradoxically decreased in KO mice (-35%, P < 0.05); this was associated with a potentially compensatory increase of IGF-II expression in both saline and dexamethasone-treated KO mice (2-fold, P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results show that myostatin deletion prevents muscle atrophy in glucocorticoid-treated mice, by blunting the glucocorticoid-induced enhanced proteolysis, and suggest an important role of myostatin in muscle atrophy caused by glucocorticoids.

These results demonstrate an association between circulating concentrations of ActA and the presence of the anorexia/cachexia syndrome in cancer patients. Given the known muscle atrophic effects of ActA, our study suggests that increased circulating concentrations of ActA may contribute to the development of cachexia in cancer patients.

MafBx and Murf are two new rat E3 ubiquitin ligases induced in muscle atrophy. Our goal was to investigate whether lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection, a model of muscle catabolism, is associated with increased expression of MafBx and Murf. LPS (750 W Wg/100 g body weight) induces MafBx and Murf mRNA (respectively, 23-fold and 33-fold after 12 h; P 6 0.001). A transient induction of tumor necrosis factor-K K mRNA (21-fold; P 6 0.001 at 3 h) and a decrease of insulin like growth factor-I mRNA (50%; P 6 0.001 at 6 h), two potential regulators of the ubiquitin^proteasome system were also demonstrated. In summary, MafBx and Murf mRNA are upregulated in response to LPS and might play a role in the muscle proteolysis observed. ß

In catabolic conditions, atrogin-1/MAFbx, a muscle-specific ubiquitin-ligase required for muscle atrophy, is increased, and concentrations of IGF-I, a growth factor known to have antiproteolytic action, are reduced. To define the relationship between the decline in IGF-I and the induction of atrogin-1/MAFbx, we studied the effect of IGF-I replacement on atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA in rats fasted for 51 h and in rats made diabetic with streptozotocin (STZ). Fasting produced a 5.8-fold increase in atrogin-1/MAFbx (P < 0.001). This was attenuated to a 2.5-fold increase by injections of IGF-I (P < 0.05 vs. fasting). Animals with STZ-induced diabetes experienced a 15.1-fold increase in atrogin-1/MAFbx (P < 0.001). Normalization of their circulating IGF-I concentrations by IGF-I infusion blunted the induction of atrogin-1/MAFbx to 6.3-fold (P < 0.05 vs. STZ diabetes without IGF-I). To further delineate the regulation of atrogin-1/MAFbx by IGF-I, we studied a model of cultured muscle cells. We observed that IGF-I produced a time- and dose-dependent reduction of atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA, with a 50% effective dose of 5 nm IGF-I, a physiological concentration. The degradation rate of atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA was not affected by IGF-I, suggesting that the reduction of atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA by IGF-I is a transcriptional effect. Exposure of muscle cells in culture to dexamethasone increased atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA with a 50% effective dose of 10 nm, a pharmacological concentration. In the presence of dexamethasone, IGF-I at physiological concentrations retained its full inhibitory effect on atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA. We conclude that IGF-I inhibits atrogin-1/MAFbx expression and speculate that this effect might contribute to the antiproteolytic action of IGF-I in muscle.