No abstract

Fourteen heart transplant recipients were monitored for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection based on determination of antigenemia, viremia, and DNAemia (by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL). Three patients had symptomatic primary, 10 had recurrent (3 asymptomatic), and 1 (seronegative) had no HCMV infection. Severe clinical symptoms appeared when levels of viremia/antigenemia were greater than 50 infected PMNL/2 x 10(5) cells examined. Of 200 blood samples examined, 93 (46.5%) were positive for viremia/antigenemia and DNAemia, whereas 48 (24.0%) were positive for DNAemia only; 59 (29.5%) were negative in all assays. Follow-up of HCMV infections in heart transplant recipients showed that PCR can detect viral appearance in blood 7-10 days earlier than assays for antigenemia/viremia. On the other hand, viral disappearance from blood, as assessed by PCR, occurred weeks or months later than revealed by other assays. Detection of virus by PCR only was never associated with overt HCMV-related clinical symptoms. Of the 8 symptomatic patients treated with ganiclovir, 2 became PCR-negative at the end of treatment and 1 cleared virus from blood in the following weeks, whereas 5 showed persistent or recurrent infection.

Use of organs from donors testing positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) may safely expand the donor pool. The American Society of Transplantation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the existing literature and developed consensus recommendations for recipient management following the use of organs from HBV positive donors. Transmission risk is highest with liver donors and significantly lower with non‐liver (kidney and thoracic) donors. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduces the rate of transmission to liver recipients from isolated HBV core antibody positive (anti‐HBc+) donors. Organs from anti‐HBc+ donors should be considered for all adult transplant candidates after an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits and appropriate patient consent. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in liver recipients with no immunity or vaccine immunity but not in liver recipients with natural immunity. Antiviral prophylaxis may be considered for up to 1 year in susceptible non‐liver recipients but is not recommended in immune non‐liver recipients. Although no longer the treatment of choice in patients with chronic HBV, lamivudine remains the most cost‐effective choice for prophylaxis in this setting. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin is not recommended.

Data derived from a single randomized clinical trial or large non-randomized studies Level of evidence C Consensus of opinion of the experts and/or small studies, retrospective studies, registries

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a well-recognized complication of immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients. The reported therapeutic approaches are frequently complicated by rejection, toxicity, and other infectious pathologies, and overall mortality in patients with unresponsive PTLD remains high. Thus, low-toxicity treatment options or, preferably, some form of prophylactic/preemptive intervention are warranted to improve PTLD outcome in this setting. We assessed whether transfer of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) generated in vitro from the peripheral blood of allograft recipients receiving immunosuppression could increase EBV-specific killing in vivo without augmenting the probability of graft rejection. Autologous EBV-specific CTLs were generated for 23 patients who were identified as being at risk of developing PTLD through the finding of elevated EBV DNA load. Of the 23 patients, 7 received 1 to 5 infusions of EBV-specific CTLs. CTL transfer was well tolerated, and none of the patients showed any evidence of rejection. An increase of the EBV-specific cytotoxicity was observed after infusion, notwithstanding continuation of immunosuppressive therapy. EBV DNA levels had a 1.5-to 3-log decrease in 5 patients, whereas in the other 2 graft recipients CTL transfer had no apparent stable effect on EBV load. Our data suggest that the infusion of autologous EBVspecific CTLs obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells recovered at the time of viral reactivation is able to augment virus-specific immune response and to reduce viral load in organ transplant recipients. This approach may, therefore, be safely used as prophylaxis of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders in these patients, following a strategy of preemptive therapy guided by EBV DNA levels. (Blood. 2002;99: 2592-2598

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a significant risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) caused mainly by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. Candida spp. is the most frequent agent of IFD in the transplant recipient. The absence of clinical trials and the epidemiological differences in IFD in different transplant programmes mean that there are no definitive recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of IFD in SOT, so most of the evidence must be based on clinical experience.

Specific preventive approaches are warranted in view of the increased risk of infection associated with some of the reviewed agents.

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether antifungal prophylaxis decreases infectious morbidity and mortality in liver transplant patients. We searched for randomized trials dealing with prophylaxis with systemic antifungal agents. We used a fixed effect model, with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI); we assessed study quality for heterogeneity and publication bias. Six studies (5 double-blind), for a total of 698 patients, compared fluconazole, itraconazole, or liposomal amphotericin to placebo (5 studies) or oral nystatin. Prophylaxis reduced colonization (RR, 0.45; CI, 0.37-0.55), total proven fungal infections (RR, 0.31; CI, 0.21-0.46), which included both superficial (RR, 0.27; CI, 0.16-0.45) and invasive (RR, 0.33; CI, 0.18-0.59) infections, and mortality attributable to fungal infection (RR, 0.30; CI, 0.12-0.75). Prophylaxis did not affect overall mortality (RR, 1.06; CI, 0.69-1.64) or empiric treatment for suspected fungal infection (RR, 0.80; CI, 0.39-1.67). The beneficial effect of antifungal prophylaxis was predominantly associated with the reduction of Candida albicans infection and mortality attributable to C. albicans. Compared to controls, however, patients receiving prophylaxis experienced a higher proportion of episodes of non-albicans Candida, and in particular of C. glabrata. No beneficial effect on invasive Aspergillus infection was observed. In conclusion, our analysis shows a clear, though limited, beneficial effect of antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients. Concerns about the selection of triazole-resistant Candida strains, however, are realistic, and the potential disadvantages of prophylaxis should be weighed against the established benefits.