No abstract

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) is a key ecological process whose impact depends on the strategy of SNF regulation—the degree to which rates of SNF change in response to limitation by N versus other resources. SNF that is obligate or exhibits incomplete downregulation can result in excess N fixation, whereas a facultative SNF strategy does not. We hypothesized that tree‐based SNF strategies differed by latitude (tropical vs. temperate) and symbiotic type (actinorhizal vs. rhizobial). Specifically, we expected tropical rhizobial symbioses to display strongly facultative SNF as an explanation of their success in low‐latitude forests. In this study we used 15N isotope dilution field experiments in New York, Oregon, and Hawaii to determine SNF strategies in six N‐fixing tree symbioses. Nitrogen fertilization with +10 and +15 g N m−2 year−1 for 4–5 years alleviated N limitation in all taxa, paving the way to determine SNF strategies. Contrary to our hypothesis, all six of the symbioses we studied sustained SNF even at high N. Robinia pseudoacacia (temperate rhizobial) fixed 91% of its N (%Ndfa) in controls, compared to 64% and 59% in the +10 and +15 g N m−2 year−1 treatments. For Alnus rubra (temperate actinorhizal), %Ndfa was 95%, 70%, and 60%. For the tropical species, %Ndfa was 86%, 80%, and 82% for Gliricidia sepium (rhizobial); 79%, 69%, and 67% for Casuarina equisetifolia (actinorhizal); 91%, 42%, and 67% for Acacia koa (rhizobial); and 60%, 51%, and 19% for Morella faya (actinorhizal). Fertilization with phosphorus did not stimulate tree growth or SNF. These results suggest that the latitudinal abundance distribution of N‐fixing trees is not caused by a shift in SNF strategy. They also help explain the excess N in many forests where N fixers are common.

Light and soil nitrogen availability can be strong controls of plant nitrogen (N) fixation, but data on how understory N‐fixing plants respond to these drivers are limited despite their important role in ecosystem N cycling. Furthermore, ecosystem N cycling can be altered by the introduction of species with nutrient use patterns that differ from natives. We assessed how N fixation of two exotic, understory species responded to varying light and soil N environments. We sampled leaf tissue from Mimosa pudica L., Desmodium triflorum (L.) DC., and a nonfixing reference plant (Axonopus) growing in control and two N fertilization treatments under either N‐fixing or non‐N‐fixing trees, which may alter local soil nutrient cycling, across a range of light conditions. We measured N fixation with 15N isotope dilution, and ensured that N‐fixing neighbour trees were in fact fixing N. All understory plants were wild‐growing species not native to the study location. Desmodium and Mimosa acquired 82.6% and 71.6% of their nitrogen from fixation (%Ndfa) in the control, compared to 66.8% and 58.1% in the +10 g N m−2 year−1 treatment and 73.1% and 64.7% in the +15 g N m−2 year−1 treatment. These subtle %Ndfa differences across fertilization treatments were more apparent at low light availability and disappeared at high light availability. The amount of N fixed by neighbouring trees did not influence %Ndfa in the understory species. Synthesis. Our study shows some differences in N fixation across different nutrient environments at low light for two N‐fixing species, though the changes were small, and both species derived most of their N from fixation. These findings imply that introduced N‐fixing species could exacerbate ecosystem N enrichment, particularly under high soil N conditions.

No abstract

No abstract