U-BIOPRED cohort n=91 epithelial brushings or biopsies IL-17 High Clinical phenotype Nasal polyps Smoking Antibiotic use Epithelial Gene Expression Profile Clinical phenotype FeNO Exacerbations Gene expression shared with psoriasis IDO1 IL1B DEFB4B S100A8, S100A9 PI3 CXCL3, CXCL8 CXCL10, CCL20 Gene signature SERPINB2 POSTN CLCA1 IL-13 High T cell infiltration Neutrophilia Eosinophilia IL-17-high asthma with features of a psoriasis immunophenotype From a the Respiratory,

BackgroundRespiratory illnesses typically present increased risks to people with asthma (PWA). However, data on the risks of COVID-19 to PWA have presented contradictory findings, with implications for asthma management.ObjectiveTo assess the risks and management considerations of COVID-19 in people with asthma (PWA).MethodWe conducted a rapid literature review. We searched PubMed, medRxiv, LitCovid, TRIP, Google and Google Scholar for terms relating to asthma and COVID-19, and for systematic reviews related to specific management questions within our review, in April 2020. References were screened and data were extracted by one reviewer.ResultsWe extracted data from 139 references. The evidence available is limited, with some sources suggesting an under-representation of PWA in hospitalised cases and others showing an increased risk of worse outcomes in PWA, which may be associated with disease severity. Consensus broadly holds that asthma medications should be continued as usual. Almost all aspects of asthma care will be disrupted during the pandemic due not only to limits in face-to-face care but also to the fact that many of the diagnostic tools used in asthma are considered aerosol-generating procedures. Self-management and remote interventions may be of benefit for asthma care during this time but have not been tested in this context.ConclusionsEvidence on COVID-19 and asthma is limited and continuing to emerge. More research is needed on the possible associations between asthma and COVID-19 infection and severity, as well as on interventions to support asthma care in light of constraints and disruptions to healthcare systems. We found no evidence regarding health inequalities, and this urgently needs to be addressed in the literature as the burdens of asthma and of COVID-19 are not equally distributed across the population.

No abstract

Background: Stratification by eosinophil and neutrophil counts increases our understanding of asthma and helps target therapy, but there is room for improvement in our accuracy in prediction of treatment responses and a need for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Objective: We sought to identify molecular subphenotypes of asthma defined by proteomic signatures for improved stratification. Methods: Unbiased label-free quantitative mass spectrometry and topological data analysis were used to analyze the proteomes of sputum supernatants from 246 participants (206 asthmatic patients) as a novel means of asthma stratification. Microarray analysis of sputum cells provided transcriptomics data additionally to inform on underlying mechanisms. Results: Analysis of the sputum proteome resulted in 10 clusters (ie, proteotypes) based on similarity in proteomic features, representing discrete molecular subphenotypes of asthma. Overlaying granulocyte counts onto the 10 clusters as metadata further defined 3 of these as highly eosinophilic, 3 as highly neutrophilic, and 2 as highly atopic with relatively low granulocytic inflammation. For each of these 3 phenotypes, logistic regression analysis identified candidate protein biomarkers, and matched transcriptomic data pointed to differentially activated underlying mechanisms.

Post-market modification of valves from AMBU bags (AMBU Inc, Columbia, MD, USA) may be more susceptible to failure during use compared with our use of commercial pressure regulators (produced under ISO standards). Our data do not cover the full range of clinical parameters. For our studies, inspiratory times were kept fixed, although in actual patients, inspiratory times may be intermittently adjusted. Furthermore, this scheme is not intended as a permanent solution for ventilating multiple patients, and should be used only with hospital administration approval and acknowledgement of the unique ethical considerations during a crisis (such as the COVID-19 pandemic). 11,12 Although the COVID-19 pandemic inspired our designs, it may have utility in other mass casualty scenarios such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and battlefield medicine. Future versions should aim to extend to more than two patients per ventilator. Declarations of interest GWF is a consultant for and on the speaker's bureau of Edwards LifeSciences. All other authors have no conflicts to declare. 4. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirusinfected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020; 323: 1061e9 5. Neyman G, Irvin CB. A single ventilator for multiple simulated patients to meet disaster surge.