In patients with NIDDM who are receiving oral hypoglycemic drug therapy, the addition of NPH insulin in the evening improves glycemic control in a manner similar to combination therapy with NPH insulin in the morning, a two-insulin-injection regimen, or a multiple-insulin-injection regimen, but induces less weight gain and hyperinsulinemia. The data thus suggest that patients with NIDDM do not benefit from multiple insulin injections and that nocturnal insulin administration appears preferable to daytime administration.
An initial improvement in glycemic control is often followed by gradual deterioration of glycemia during insulin treatment of patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We examined the causes of such worsening in a 12-month follow-up analysis of 100 insulin-treated NIDDM patients in the Finnish Multicenter Insulin Therapy Study who were treated with either combination therapy with insulin or insulin alone. In the entire study group, glycemic control averaged 9.7 +/- 0.2% at 0 months and 8.0 +/- 0.1%, 8.0 +/- 0.1%, 8.2 +/- 0.1%, and 8.5 +/- 0.2% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (P < 0.001 for each time point vs. 0 months). Glycemic control at 12 months was significantly worse than that at 3 (P < 0.001), 6 (P < 0.001), and 9 months (P < 0.02). Baseline body mass index was the most significant predictor of deterioration in glycemic control. During 1 yr, hemoglobin A1c decreased almost 3-fold more (by 1.7 +/- 0.2%; P < 0.001 vs. 0 months) in patients whose baseline weight was below the mean baseline body mass index of 28.1 kg/m2 (nonobese patients) than in those whose weight exceeded 28.1 kg/m2 (obese patients; 0.5 +/- 0.2%; P = NS vs. 0 months; P < 0.01 vs. obese patients). Glycemic control improved similarly over 1 yr in the nonobese subjects and deteriorated similarly in the obese patients regardless of their treatment regimen. Insulin doses, per body weight, were similar in the nonobese and obese patients. The nonobese patients consistently gained less weight during 12 months of combination therapy with insulin (3.5 +/- 0.6 kg at 12 months) than during insulin therapy alone (5.1 +/- 0.6 kg; P < 0.05). The treatment regimen did not influence weight gain in the obese group, who gained 4.4 +/- 1.0 kg during combination therapy with insulin and 4.5 +/- 1.1 kg during insulin therapy alone. We reached the following conclusions: 1) after an initial good response, glycemic control deteriorates more in obese than in nonobese patients with NIDDM; 2) in obese patients, weight gain per se cannot explain the poor glycemic response to combination or insulin therapy, but it may induce a disproportionately large increase in insulin requirements because of greater insulin resistance in the obese than in the nonobese; 3) in nonobese patients, glycemic control improves equally during 1 yr with combination therapy with insulin and insulin alone, but combination therapy with insulin is associated with less weight gain than treatment with insulin alone; 4) weight gain appears harmful, as it is associated with increases in blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Abstract. To determine endocrine activity of adrenal tumours incidentally discovered on CT, we examined 20 consecutive patients. They underwent thorough hormonal assessment and scintigraphic scanning with radioactive cholesterol under dexamethasone suppression (19 patients). Biochemical findings compatible with cortisol hypersecretion were detected in 5 patients. One patient had reduced reserves of cortisol secretion and one had hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism. The scintigraphy showed no uptake in 10, unilateral uptake in 4, and bilateral uptake in 5 patients. In 3 patients the finding was unilateral on CT, but bilateral on scintigraphy. Signs of autonomous cortisol production were more common among patients who had uptake on scintigraphy. At the operation of 8 patients only benign lesions were found. During the follow-up (9 to 49 months) of the 12 unoperated patients, the tumour disappeared in one and remained unchanged in the others. No changes occurred in the biochemical findings except in one patient whose cortisol response to 1 mg of dexamethasone became abnormal. Since slight hypercortisolism or a bilateral disease often exists behind an incidentally discovered adrenal tumour, we emphasize the importance of careful assessment of cortisol metabolism and a scintigraphic scanning under dexamethasone suppression in the examination of these patients.
Plasma and urinary C-peptide determinations in the discrimination between insulin-requiring and non-insulin-requiring diabetes were elevated in 61 adult diabetics. Specimens for C-peptide determinations were taken on two consecutive days: on the first day plasma C-peptide concentrations were determined before and 6 min after intravenous glucagon administration. On the second day 2- and 4-h urinary C-peptide excretion was measured after an individual breakfast. Results of urinary C-peptide analyses were expressed as molar concentration and also as molar quantity excreted (without any corrections and related to creatinine excretion). Glucagon-stimulated plasma C-peptide turned out to be a reliable criterion for the detection of insulin requirement. Sixty-nine per cent of diabetics included in this study were classifiable by basal plasma C-peptide concentrations. Two-hour postprandial urinary C-peptide/creatinine quotient turned out to be slightly less sensitive (89%) than the glucagon test (94%) and of equal specificity (96%). Glucagon-stimulated plasma C-peptide and postprandial urinary C-peptide excretion correlated significantly among insulin-requiring diabetics (r = 0.73), but not among non-insulin-requiring diabetics (r = 0.23). We regard determination of stimulated plasma C-peptide as a primary investigation for the direct assessment of endogenous insulin secretory reserves for clinical management decisions. Determination of postprandial urinary C-peptide is applicable in selected situations for non-invasive assessment of insulin secretion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.