In order to simplify post-coronary stenting treatment and to obtain a lower rate of complications, especially in bailout situations, seven French institutions treated 246 stented patients with 0.25 g/day of ticlopidine, 0.1 g/day of IV aspirin, and 2 days of heparin followed by low-molecular-weight heparin for 1 month. Fifty percent of patients had a planned stenting procedure, and 50% had an unplanned procedure, including 29 (11.8%) in bailout situations. Subacute occlusion occurred in three (1.2%) patients (one death, two non-Q-wave infarctions). During the 1 month follow-up period, another death was reported (non-stent-related), two elective coronary artery bypass grafts were performed, and three additional patients presented with non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. Nine (3.7%) patients had a groin complication that required blood transfusion or surgical repair. These results suggest that while waiting for the technological advancements of stents, postprocedural treatment that includes a low dosage of ticlopidine, aspirin, and low-molecular-weight heparin is a very effective alternative to conventional poststenting therapy.
This study investigates the influence of coronary stenting on the risk of emergency bypass surgery performed within 24 hr of percutaneous tranluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with particular concern for incidence and indication. Since 1995, coronary stenting has been increasingly performed in France during angioplasty procedures, altering significantly the role of emergency bypass surgery. The outcome of elective stenting and widespread use of coronary stenting and its influence on emergency surgery have not been evaluated so far. Through a retrospective (1995) and prospective (1996) registry, we analyzed the incidence, indication and results of emergency bypass surgery performed within 24 hr of PTCA in 68 and 57 centers, respectively, accounting for nearly half of all angioplasty procedures in France. Data were collected through questionnaires consisting of separate forms for every case report that were sent to every center. Over the two years, 26,885 and 27,497 procedures were investigated with a stenting rate of 46% and 64%, respectively. The observed need for emergency surgery was constantly low throughout this period (0.38% and 0.32%, respectively). Indications for surgery included complications directly due to stent in 37% of cases in the 2-year period. Outcome remained poor, with in-hospital mortality in 10% and 17% and myocardial infarction in 27% and 25% of cases, respectively. A comparison of the results in centers with and without surgical facilities showed no differences in outcome, despite a longer time to surgery (359 min ؎ 406 min vs. 170 min ؎ 205 min, P ؍ 0.0001) and a lower incidence of emergency surgery (0.25% vs. 0.44%, P ؍ 0.0001) in centers without on-site surgery backup. The French multicenter registry reveals an increase in the use of stents together with a dramatic decrease in the incidence of emergency bypass surgery (below 0.5 %) following PTCA. There has been a significant evolution in the indication, and stent implantation now accounts for a third of the indications for emergency bypass surgery. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:441-448, 1999.
SummaryObjective: To analyze the long term evolution of patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvoplasty comparing the Inoue and Balt single balloon methods, and to identify predictors of death and major events (death, repeat balloon mitral valvoplasty or mitral valve surgery).
Methods
Percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy is an effective procedure, and over 2/3 of the patients were event-free at the end of follow-up. Survival in the group was high, even higher in the group with lower echocardiographic scores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.