No abstract

The levels of degradation of cefetamet pivoxil (CAT), cefuroxime axetil (CAE), and cefpodoxime proxetil (CPD) in 0.6 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and human intestinal juice (pH 7.4) at 37°C over 24 h were compared. Significant differences in the time courses of degradation and in the patterns of degradation products were observed. (i) The relative proportions of the Δ2- and Δ3-cephalosporins were roughly reversed in the two incubation media. In phosphate buffer, the major degradation product was the Δ2-cephalosporin (CAT = 61%; CAE = 74%; CPD = 85%), while in intestinal juice it was the Δ3-cephalosporin (CAT = 86%; CAE = 75%; CPD = 87%). (ii) Generally, the degradation of the prodrug esters progressed faster in intestinal juice than in phosphate buffer (e.g., for CAT the half-lives [t 1/2s] were 0.78 and 4.3 h, respectively). (iii) The two diastereoisomers of CAE and CPD were degraded at different rates in intestinal juice (for the CAE diasteroisomers, t 1/2s = 0.37 and 0.93 h; for the CPD diastereoisomers,t 1/2s = 0.18 and 0.98 h) but were degraded at similar rates in phosphate buffer (for the CAE diastereoisomers, t 1/2 = 1.6 h; for the CPD t 1/2 diastereoisomers, = 2.2 h). It is concluded that (i) the Δ2 isomerization does not significantly affect the bioavailability of prodrug esters since enzymatic hydrolysis in the intestinal fluid proceeds mainly to the active Δ3-cephalosporin and (ii) the high degree of stereoselectivity of the enzymatic ester hydrolysis should make it possible to increase the bioavailabilities of certain prodrug esters (CAE, CPD) by using the more stable diasterioisomer.

This paper presents the recommendations of the Global Bioanalytical Consortium Harmonization Team on method transfer, partial validation, and cross validation. These aspects of bioanalytical method validation, while important, have received little detailed attention in recent years. The team has attempted to define, separate, and describe these related activities, and present practical guidance in how to apply these techniques.

No abstract

Reboxetine is a new selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI) for the short- and long-term treatment of depression that is effective and well tolerated at a dose of 8 to 10 mg/day. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in volunteers with renal impairment. A single 4 mg dose of reboxetine was administered to a total of 18 volunteers with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), or severe (n = 6) renal impairment (creatinine clearance: 56-64, 26-51, and 9-19 ml/min, respectively), and reboxetine concentrations were measured in plasma by HPLC. Mean AUC infinity increased by 43% (mild vs. severe; p < 0.01) as renal function declined, while renal clearance and total urinary excretion of unchanged reboxetine decreased by 67% and 62%, respectively (mild vs. severe; p < 0.01 for both parameters). tmax and t1/2 were not significantly different between groups. In comparison with historical data from young healthy volunteers, AUC infinity and t1/2 are at least doubled in volunteers with renal impairment, while CLr is halved. This pharmacokinetic study has shown that increasing renal dysfunction leads to increasing systemic exposure to reboxetine, particularly in severe renal insufficiency, although reboxetine was well tolerated by all volunteers. Thus, a reduction of the starting dose of reboxetine to 2 mg twice daily would be prudent in patients with renal dysfunction.