OBJECTIVE To study the MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) system, which includes an algorithm with individualized basal target set points, automated correction bolus function, and improved Auto Mode stability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This dual-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence crossover study in automated-insulin-delivery–naive participants with type 1 diabetes (aged 7–80 years) compared AHCL to sensor-augmented pump therapy with predictive low glucose management (SAP + PLGM). Each study phase was 4 weeks, preceded by a 2- to 4-week run-in and separated by a 2-week washout. RESULTS The study was completed by 59 of 60 people (mean age 23.3 ± 14.4 years). Time in target range (TIR) 3.9–10 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL) favored AHCL over SAP + PLGM (70.4 ± 8.1% vs. 57.9 ± 11.7%) by 12.5 ± 8.5% (P < 0.001), with greater improvement overnight (18.8 ± 12.9%, P < 0.001). All age-groups (children [7–13 years], adolescents [14–21 years], and adults [>22 years]) demonstrated improvement, with adolescents showing the largest improvement (14.4 ± 8.4%). Mean sensor glucose (SG) at run-in was 9.3 ± 0.9 mmol/L (167 ± 16.2 mg/dL) and improved with AHCL (8.5 ± 0.7 mmol/L [153 ± 12.6 mg/dL], P < 0.001), but deteriorated during PLGM (9.5 ± 1.1 mmol/L [17 ± 19.8 mg/dL], P < 0.001). TIR was optimal when the algorithm set point was 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) compared with 6.7 mmol/L (120 mg/dL), 72.0 ± 7.9% vs. 64.6 ± 6.9%, respectively, with no additional hypoglycemia. Auto Mode was active 96.4 ± 4.0% of the time. The percentage of hypoglycemia at baseline (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL] and ≤3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) was 3.1 ± 2.1% and 0.5 ± 0.6%, respectively. During AHCL, the percentage time at <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) improved to 2.1 ± 1.4% (P = 0.034) and was statistically but not clinically reduced for ≤3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) (0.5 ± 0.5%; P = 0.025). There was one episode of mild diabetic ketoacidosis attributed to an infusion set failure in combination with an intercurrent illness, which occurred during the SAP + PLGM arm. CONCLUSIONS AHCL with automated correction bolus demonstrated significant improvement in glucose control compared with SAP + PLGM. A lower algorithm SG set point during AHCL resulted in greater TIR, with no increase in hypoglycemia.
Objective:<br><p> To study the MiniMed™ Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop system (AHCL) which includes an algorithm with individualised basal target set points, automated correction bolus function, and improved Auto Mode stability.<br> Research design and Methods:</p> <p>This dual-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence cross-over study in automated insulin delivery naïve participants with type 1 diabetes (aged 7-80yrs), compared AHCL to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP+PLGM). Each study phase was 4 weeks, preceded by a 2-4 week run-in, and separated by 2-week washout.</p> <p><a>Results:<b> </b><br> 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3±14.4yrs). Time in target range (TIR) 3.9-10mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) favoured AHCL over SAP+PLGM (</a>70.4±8.1 vs 57.9±11.7) by 12.5±8.5% (p<0.001), with greater improvement overnight (18.8±12.9%, p<0.001). All age groups (children (7 – 13 years), adolescents (14 – 21 years), and adults (>22 years) demonstrated improvement, with adolescents showing the largest improvement (14.4±8.4%). Mean sensor glucose (SG) at run in was 9.3±0.9 mmol/L (167±16.2mg/dL) and improved with AHCL (8.5±0.7mmol/L (153±12.6mg/dL) (p < 0.001)), but deteriorated during PLGM (9.5±1.1mmol/L (17±19.8mg/dL), (p<0.001)).. TIR was optimal when the algorithm set point was 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) compared to 6.7 mmol/L (120 mg/dL), 72.0±7.9% vs 64.6±6.9% respectively with no additional hypoglycemia. Auto Mode was active 96.4±4.0% of the time. <a>The percentage of hypoglycemia at baseline (<3.9mmol/L (70mg/dl) and </a> £ 3.0mmol/L(54mg/dl)) was 3.1±2.1% and 0.5±0.6% respectively. During AHCL percentage time <3.9mmol/L (70mg/dl) improved to 2.1±1.4% (p=0.034) (70mg/dl), and was statistically but not clinically reduced for £ 3.0mmol/L(54mg/dl) (0.5±0.5%, p = 0.025) There was one episode of mild diabetic ketoacidosis attributed to an infusion set failure in combination with an intercurrent illness, which occurred during the SAP+PLGM arm.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>AHCL with automated correction bolus demonstrated significant improvement in glucose control compared to SAP+PLGM. A lower algorithm sensor glucose set point during AHCL resulted in greater TIR, with no increase in hypoglycemia.</p>
Background: The Medtronic Minimed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop system (AHCL) includes an individualised algorithm with optional set points, automated correction bolus, and improved SmartGuard™ Auto Mode stability. Methods: This dual-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence cross-over study in automated insulin delivery naïve participants (aged 7-80yrs), compared AHCL to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP+PLGM). Each study phase was 4 weeks, preceded by a 2-4 week run-in, and separated by 2-week washout. Results: 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3±14.4yrs). Overall time in target range (TIR) (70-180mg/dL) favoured AHCL over SAP+PLGM by 12.5±8.5% (p<0.001), with greater improvement overnight (15.7±12.0%, p<0.001) (Table 1). This was primarily due to reduction in hyperglycemia (-12.1±9.0% time spent >180mg/dL). Mean SG improved in AHCL by 10.0±7.4mg/dL (p<0.001). For each 1% lower baseline TIR, there was a 0.5% greater TIR improvement with AHCL (p<0.001). Auto Mode was active for 95.3±3.6% of the time. Conclusion: AHCL with automated correction bolus showed significant improvement in glucose control compared to PLGM, in a population with a younger mean age reflecting a challenging demographic. Disclosure O. Collyns: None. R. Meier: None. Z. Betts: None. D. Chan: None. C. Frampton: None. C.M. Frewen: None. B. Grosman: Employee; Self; Medtronic. N. Hewapathirana: Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi. S. Jones: None. N. Kurtz: Employee; Self; Medtronic. A. Roy: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. B.J. Wheeler: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. M. de Bock: None.
Background: Automated insulin delivery aims to lower treatment burden and improve quality of life as well as glycemic outcomes. Methods: This dual-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence cross-over study in automated insulin delivery naïve users, compared Medtronic Minimed® Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP+PLGM). At the end of each 4 week intervention impacts on quality of life were compared using age-appropriate scales: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status and change (DTSQs and DTSQc), Diabetes Technology Questionnaire (DTQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), World Health Organisation-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Hypoglycemic Fear Survey (HFS-II) and Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS). Results: 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3±14.4yrs). Statistically significant differences favouring AHCL were demonstrated in several scales (data shown as mean±SE). Technology satisfaction favoured AHCL over PLGM as shown by a higher score in the DTSQs during AHCL (n=28) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=29) (30.9±0.7 vs. 27.9±0.7, p=0.004) and DTSQc AHCL (n=29) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=30) (11.7±0.9 vs. 9.2±0.8, p=0.032) in adults. Adolescents also showed a higher DTSQc score during AHCL (n=16) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=15) (14.8±0.7 vs. 12.1±0.8, p=0.024). The DTQ “change” score (n=59) favoured AHCL over SAP+ PLGM (3.5±0.0 vs. 3.3±0.0, p<0.001). Improved sleep quality was demonstrated by the lower PSQI in those aged over 16 years (n= 36) during AHCL vs. SAP+PLGM (4.8±0.3 vs. 5.7±0.3, p=0.048) with > 5 indicating poor quality sleep. No differences were found in the other scales. Conclusion: The findings from this RCT suggest AHCL compared to SAP + PLGM mode has the potential to increase treatment satisfaction and improve subjective sleep quality in adolescents and adults with T1D. Disclosure O. Collyns: None. R. Meier: None. Z. Betts: None. D. Chan: None. C. Frampton: None. C.M. Frewen: None. B. Galland: None. N. Hewapathirana: Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi. S. Jones: None. N. Kurtz: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. B.J. Wheeler: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. M. de Bock: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.