Traditionally, groundwater and surface water flow models have been calibrated against two observation types: hydraulic heads and surface water discharge. It has repeatedly been demonstrated, however, that these classical observations do not contain sufficient information to calibrate flow models. To reduce the predictive uncertainty of flow models, the consideration of other observation types constitutes a promising way forward. Despite the ever-increasing availability of other observation types, however, they are still unconventional when it comes to flow model calibration. By reviewing studies that included nonclassical observations in flow model calibration, benefits and challenges associated with their integration in flow model calibration were identified, and their information content was analyzed. While explicit simulation of mass transport processes in flow models poses challenges, even simplified approaches to integrate tracer concentrations yield significantly better calibration results than using only classical observations. For a majority of calibrated flow models, observations of tracer concentrations and of exchange fluxes were beneficial. Temperature observations improved the simulation of heat transport but often worsened all other model outcomes. Only when temperature observations were made within 2 m of the surface water-groundwater interface did they have the potential to also improve flow and mass transport simulations. Surprisingly, many models were calibrated manually rather than with the widely available, mathematically robust and automated tools. There is a clear need for more systematic implementation of unconventional observations and automated flow model calibration as well as for more systematic quantification of the information content of unconventional observations. Plain Language Summary Traditionally, groundwater and surface water flow models, which are critical for water resources assessment, have been calibrated against only two classical observation types: groundwater levels and surface water discharge. In the past, it has repeatedly been demonstrated that these classical observations do not contain sufficient information to calibrate the parameters required for the simulation of groundwater and surface water flow systems. Owing to the rapid development of measurement techniques throughout the last three decades, however, many other observations of hydrological systems have become widely available. Despite this, observation types other than the classical ones are still unconventional when it comes to flow model calibration. The overall goal of this review is to identify optimal observation types and procedures for flow model calibration and hydrological predictions. We found that observations of tracer concentrations and exchange fluxes are beneficial for most flow models. Temperatures improve the simulation of heat transport but often worsen other flow model outcomes, unless temperatures are measured within 2 m of the surface water-groundwater interface. We identified a need for...
To provide a sound understanding of the sources, pathways, and residence times of groundwater water in alluvial river‐aquifer systems, a combined multitracer and modeling experiment was carried out in an important alluvial drinking water wellfield in Switzerland. 222Rn, 3H/3He, atmospheric noble gases, and the novel 37Ar‐method were used to quantify residence times and mixing ratios of water from different sources. With a half‐life of 35.1 days, 37Ar allowed to successfully close a critical observational time gap between 222Rn and 3H/3He for residence times of weeks to months. Covering the entire range of residence times of groundwater in alluvial systems revealed that, to quantify the fractions of water from different sources in such systems, atmospheric noble gases and helium isotopes are tracers suited for end‐member mixing analysis. A comparison between the tracer‐based mixing ratios and mixing ratios simulated with a fully‐integrated, physically‐based flow model showed that models, which are only calibrated against hydraulic heads, cannot reliably reproduce mixing ratios or residence times of alluvial river‐aquifer systems. However, the tracer‐based mixing ratios allowed the identification of an appropriate flow model parametrization. Consequently, for alluvial systems, we recommend the combination of multitracer studies that cover all relevant residence times with fully‐coupled, physically‐based flow modeling to better characterize the complex interactions of river‐aquifer systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.