PEDIATRIC IMAGING D rug-resistant epilepsy occurs in one-third of patients with epilepsy (1). The main treatment to alleviate seizures in those patients is epilepsy surgery, provided that the presumed location of the epileptogenic zone (PLEZ) is focal, well localized, and does not involve functionally eloquent cortices (1). Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides nonredundant information for the noninvasive localization of the PLEZ in patients with refractory focal epilepsy (RFE) (2,3).Cryogenic MEG systems house hundreds of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) in a rigid, one-size-fits-all helmet (4). SQUIDs have several major limitations (4). Due to cryogenic cooling, a thermally insulated gap is required between the scalp and SQUIDs, meaning that the brain-to-sensor distance is approximately 2-5 cm in adults who fit the system well and larger in patients with small heads, such as children. Small head size increases the brain-to-sensor signal attenuation as magnetic fields decrease with the square of the distance. Pediatric SQUID-based MEG (hereafter, SQUID-MEG) systems do not fully alleviate those limitations as they restrict the use of MEG to specific age ranges (eg, infants or school-aged children) (5).Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are cryogen-free magnetic field sensors. OPMs can be placed directly on the scalp to record neuromagnetic signals with an Purpose: To determine if on-scalp MEG based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) alleviates the main limitations of cryogenic MEG. Materials and Methods:In this prospective single-center study conducted in a tertiary university teaching hospital, participants underwent cryogenic (102 magnetometers, 204 planar gradiometers) and on-scalp (32 OPMs) MEG. The two modalities for the detection and localization of IEDs were compared. The t test was used to compare IED amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Distributed source modeling was performed on OPM-based and cryogenic MEG data.Results: Five children (median age, 9.4 years [range, 5-11 years]; four girls) with self-limited idiopathic (n = 3) or refractory (n = 2) focal epilepsy were included. IEDs were identified in all five children with comparable sensor topographies for both MEG devices. IED amplitudes were 2.3 (7.2 of 3.1) to 4.6 (3.2 of 0.7) times higher (P , .001) with on-scalp MEG, and the SNR was 27% (16.7 of 13.2) to 60% (12.8 of 8.0) higher (P value range: .001-.009) with on-scalp MEG in all but one participant (P = .93), whose head movements created pronounced motion artifacts. The neural source of averaged IEDs was located at approximately 5 mm (n = 3) or higher (8.3 mm, n = 1; 15.6 mm, n = 1) between on-scalp and cryogenic MEG. Conclusion:Despite the limited number of sensors and scalp coverage, on-scalp magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped magnetometers helped detect interictal epileptiform discharges in school-aged children with epilepsy with a higher amplitude, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and similar localization value compared with conventional cr...
To evaluate the yield of Functional Connectivity (FC) in addition to low-density ictal Electrical Source Imaging (ESI) in extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), using an automated algorithm for analysis. Method: Long-term EEG monitoring of consecutive ETLE patients who underwent surgery was reviewed by epileptologists, and seizure onsets characterized by rhythmical activity were identified. A spectrogram-based algorithm was developed to select objectively the parameters of ESI analysis. Two methods for SOZ localization were compared: i) ESI power, based on LORETA exclusively; ii) ESI + FC, including a Granger causality-based connectivity analysis. Results were determined at a sublobar level. The resection zone, in relation to 1-year follow-up surgical outcome, was considered as reference standard for diagnostic accuracy analyses. Results: Ninety-four seizures from 24 patients were analyzed. At seizure-level, ESI power showed 36 % sensitivity and 72 % specificity (accuracy: 45 %). ESI + FC significantly improved the accuracy, with 52 % sensitivity and 84 % specificity (accuracy: 61 %, p = 0.04). Results of ESI + FC were equally valuable in patients with lateralized or bilateral/generalized visual interpretation of ictal EEG. In a patient level sub-analysis, upon blinded clinical interpretation, ESI + FC showed a correct localization in 67 % of patients and substantial interrater agreement (kappa = 0.64), against 27 % achieved by ESI power, with fair inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.37). Conclusion: FC significantly improves SOZ localization compared to ESI solely in ETLE. Ictal ESI + FC could represent a novel option in the armamentarium of presurgical evaluation, aiding also in patients with visually non-localizable scalp ictal EEG. Prospective studies evaluating the clinical added value of automated low-density ictal ESI may be justified.
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an established method to investigate epilepsy. Current MEG systems house hundreds of cryogenic sensors in a rigid, one-size-fits-all helmet, which results in several limitations, particularly in children. On-scalp MEG based on optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) may alleviate these limitations. We report on five children (5-11 years old) with self-limited focal (n=3) or structural (n=2) epilepsy who underwent cryogenic (102 magnetometers) and on-scalp (32 OPMs) MEG. We compared the two modalities for the detection and localization of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). We identified IEDs in all children with comparable sensor topographies for both MEG devices. IED amplitudes were 2.3-4.8 times higher with on-scalp MEG and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was also 27-60% higher with on-scalp MEG in all but one patient with large head movement artifacts. The neural source of averaged IEDs was located at about 5 mm (n=3) or higher (8.3 mm, n=1; 15.6 mm, n=1) between on-scalp and cryogenic MEG. Despite limited number of sensors and scalp coverage, on-scalp MEG detects IEDs in epileptic children with higher SNR than cryogenic MEG. This technology, which is in constant development, should become a reference in the diagnostic workup of epilepsy and replace cryogenic MEG in the near future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.