Aiming for regime transformation, post-transition Angolan civil society activism moved from reformism and confrontationism to ultra-confrontationism. Reformism and confrontationism evolved until the 2008 elections, influenced by development thinking (neoliberalism/institutionalism vs neo-Marxism/world-system thinking), in two opposing strategies: ‘constructive engagement’ vs political defiance. The dispute ended with ultra-confrontationism gaining impetus with the Arab spring, with a younger generation resorting to new methods (information and communications technology and demonstrations). Despite the lack of funding or international links, the newer methods caused more concern to the regime. Nevertheless, they suffer from the same shortfalls as their predecessors: they are confined to an urban/suburban social segment, and unable to attract the majority of the population.
Proximate to a Weberian perspective, this article argues that the resilience of the Angolan regime is mainly owed to an ethos structured on top of a specific socio-cultural historical matrix (minority at start), evolving since the 16th century. Such matrix was structured on a prevailing Weltanschauung (world and national vision), that has been progressively self-presented, self-assumed, imposed/assimilated as national and modern within a project of identity and power hegemony, even though still and constantly ridden by several internal contradictions and tensions. Dynamics of this process is central to understand the intricacies of the relationship between rulers and ruled, evolving identities as well as the still significant social support to the party in power after more than four decades in the government. The regime’s resilience lays on such ethos in support of hegemonic power and identity project, above and beyond the president and all his political management abilities, beyond the central instrumentality of the national oil company (SONANGOL), beyond the media spotlight on influential names surrounding the presidency, including the president’s men, generals, and beyond authoritarianism.
Este texto apresenta uma análise da política angolana desde a independência aos nossos dias partindo de duas posições políticas contrárias que influenciaram de sobremaneira o percurso do país no pós-independência e que permitem compreender não só as disputas em curso como as políticas e estratégias seguidas. São contrastadas as posições caracterizadas como de pragmatismo nacionalista de matriz liberal e internacionalismo progressista de matriz socialista-marxista, seguindo critérios de ideologia influenciando a gestão política, economia política e política externa. A análise identifica a matriz que, embora sob diversas roupagens, discursos e protagonistas, apresenta uma coerência de médio e longo-prazo e uma linha orientadora do percurso político-econômico trilhado pelo partido no poder desde 1975. O trabalho estruturase em duas grandes partes, historicamente sequenciais, sendo a primeira dedicada ao enquadramento do tema e suas implicações políticas ao longo da presidência de Agostinho Neto (1975-1979) e a segunda abarcando a muito mais longa administração de Eduardo dos Santos, desde 1979 aos nossos dias, passando por diferentes contextos nacionais e internacionais ao longo dos anos.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.