BackgroundCirculating biomarkers are urgently needed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of detecting and isolating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in HCC patients using enrichment for epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) expression, to examine their prognostic value, and to explore CTC-based DNA sequencing in metastatic HCC patients compared to a control cohort with non-malignant liver diseases (NMLD).MethodsWhole blood was obtained from patients with metastatic HCC or NMLD. CTCs were enumerated by CellSearch then purified by immunomagnetic EpCAM enrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Targeted ion semiconductor sequencing was performed on whole genome-amplified DNA from CTCs, tumor specimens, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) when available.ResultsTwenty HCC and 10 NMLD patients enrolled. CTCs ≥ 2/7.5 mL were detected in 7/20 (35%, 95% confidence interval: 12%, 60%) HCC and 0/9 eligible NMLD (p = 0.04). CTCs ≥ 1/7.5 mL was associated with alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL (p = 0.008) and vascular invasion (p = 0.009). Sequencing of CTC DNA identified characteristic HCC mutations. The proportion with ≥ 100x coverage depth was lower in CTCs (43%) than tumor or PBMC (87%) (p < 0.025). Low frequency variants were higher in CTCs (p < 0.001).ConclusionsCTCs are detectable by EpCAM enrichment in metastatic HCC, without confounding false positive background from NMLD. CTC detection was associated with poor prognostic factors. Sequencing of CTC DNA identified known HCC mutations but more low-frequency variants and lower coverage depth than FFPE or PBMC.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1195-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has developed a set of guidelines for respiratory cytology including indications for sputum examination, bronchial washings and brushings, CT-guided FNA and endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), as well as recommendations for classification and criteria, ancillary testing and post-cytologic diagnosis management and follow-up. All recommendation documents are based on the expertise of committee members, an extensive literature review, and feedback from presentations at national and international conferences. The guideline documents selectively present the results of these discussions. The present document summarizes recommendations for ancillary testing of cytologic samples. Ancillary testing including microbiologic, immunocytochemical, flow cytometric, and molecular testing, including next-generation sequencing are discussed.

it.An enduring goal of personalized medicine in cancer is the ability to identify patients who are likely to respond to specific therapies. Our growing understanding of the biology and molecular signatures of individual tumor types has facilitated the identification of predictive biomarkers and has led to an increasing number of diagnostic tests to be performed, often as serial and distinct assays on limited tumor specimens. The biomarker diagnostics field has been revolutionized by next-generation sequencing (NGS), which provides a comprehensive overview of the genomic profile of a tumor. Many preanalytic variables can influence the accuracy and reliability of NGS results. Standardization of preanalytic variables is, however, complicated by the plethora of specimen acquisition and processing methods. Variables across the tissue journey, including specimen acquisition, specimen fixation, and sectioning, as well as postfixation processing, such as nucleic acid extraction, library preparation, and choice of sequencing methods, are critical for the reliability of NGS analysis; thus, standardization would be beneficial. In this article, each step in the tissue journey is outlined, with specific focus on preanalytic variables that can influence NGS results. Practical considerations for standardization of these variables are provided to facilitate accurate, reliable, and reproducible NGS-based molecular characterization of tumors, ultimately informing diagnosis and guiding treatment.

Biopsy specimens are subjected to an expanding portfolio of assays that regularly include mutation profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Specimens derived via fine-needle aspiration, a common biopsy technique, are subjected to a variety of cytopreparatory methods compared with surgical biopsies that are almost uniformly processed as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Therefore, the fine-needle aspiration-derived specimens most commonly accepted for molecular analysis are cell blocks (CBs), because they are processed most similarly to surgical biopsy tissue. However, CB preparations are fraught with challenges that risk unsuccessful sequencing and repeat biopsies, with the potential to further increase health care costs and delay clinical care. The diversity of cytopreparations and the resource-intensive clinical validation of NGS pose significant challenges to more consistent use of non-CB (NCB) cytology specimens. As part of clinical validation of a targeted NGS assay, DNA subjected to nine cytopreparatory methods was evaluated for sequencing performance and was shown to be uniformly acceptable for clinical NGS. Of the 379 clinical cases analyzed after validation, the majority (56%) were derived from NCB cytology specimens. This specimen class had the lowest DNA insufficiency rate (1.5%) and showed equivalent sequencing performance to surgical and CB formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. NCB cytology specimens are valuable sources of tumor nucleic acid and are the preferred specimen type for clinical NGS at our institution.