In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients—manually annotated by up to four raters—and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%–85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.

No abstract

No abstract

In this paper, a new neural network model inspired by the biological immune system functions is presented. The model, termed Artificial Immune-Activated Neural Network (AIANN), extracts classification knowledge from a training data set, which is then used to classify input patterns or vectors. The AIANN is based on a neuron activation function whose behavior is conceptually modeled after the chemical bonds between the receptors and epitopes in the biological immune system. The bonding is controlled through an energy measure to ensure accurate recognition. The AIANN model was applied to the segmentation of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the brain and a contextual basis was developed for the segmentation problem. Evaluation of the segmentation results was performed using both real MRI data obtained from the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital and simulated MRI data generated using the McGill University BrainWeb MRI simulator. Experimental results demonstrated that the AIANN model attained higher average results than those obtained using published methods for real MRI data and simulated MRI data, especially at low levels of noise.